Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by authority- California Air Resources Board (CARB) €168.7m 89 % · 1 case
- California Labor Commissioner's Office (Division of Labor Standards Enforcement) €14.8m 8 % · 8 cases
- Attorney General of California (California Department of Justice) €3.62m 2 % · 2 cases
- California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) €1.78m 1 % · 3 cases
- California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA), Board €304,793 0 % · 1 case
- California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) €180,168 0 % · 1 case
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by sectorAll sectors
- Automotive €169.3m 89 % · 2 cases
- Retail and e-commerce €7.9m 4 % · 4 cases
- Food and agriculture €7.34m 4 % · 3 cases
- Media and online platforms €3.62m 2 % · 2 cases
- Healthcare €612,121 0 % · 1 case
- Other €415,809 0 % · 2 cases
- Steel and metals €180,168 0 % · 1 case
- Construction and real estate — 0 % · 1 case
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2023 | 1 | — |
| Q1 2024 | 1 | €929,541 |
| Q2 2024 | 2 | €6.12m |
| Q3 2024 | 1 | €1.53m |
| Q4 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2025 | 1 | €582,573 |
| Q2 2025 | 1 | €304,793 |
| Q3 2025 | 3 | €3.05m |
| Q4 2025 | 2 | €415,809 |
| Q1 2026 | 3 | €7.72m |
| Q2 2026 | 1 | €168.7m |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | — |
16 cases
18 May 2026 Volvo Group North America, LLCVolvo Group North America: settlement of around 197 million USD over undisclosed emission control devices €168.7m
Around 10,000 heavy-duty Volvo diesel engines from model years 2010 to 2016 used auxiliary emission control devices (AECDs) that were not disclosed during certification and emitted more NOx than permitted. The settlement with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) comprises 17.5 million USD in penalties and costs, 71 million USD for mitigation measures and 108 million USD for emission reduction projects in California.
Every emissions-relevant control function must be fully disclosed in the certification application; otherwise high settlement payments may follow years later.
- Authority / court
- California Air Resources Board (CARB)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Kalifornische Emissions- und Zertifizierungsvorschriften für schwere Nutzfahrzeugmotoren
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Automotive
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Mitigating circumstances
- Cooperation during the investigation; recall and extended warranty for engines from model years 2014 to 2016.
- Published
- 18 May 2026
Original amount 196,500,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 May 2026.
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
26 Feb 2026 All FAB Precision Sheetmetal, Inc.Sheet metal fabricator: second amputation on the same press brake – Cal/OSHA $212,850 €180,168
In June 2025, an employee in San Jose lost a finger on a press brake without guarding – identical to an accident in June 2024 for which the business had already been fined $43,500. The California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) imposed $212,850 (including a wilful repeat violation); the employer appealed.
After an accident, retrofitting the machine is mandatory – an identical second accident will be treated as wilful.
- Authority / court
- California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
- Legal basis
- California Code of Regulations, Title 8 (Maschinenschutz)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Steel and metals
- Culpability
- intentional
- Repeat case
- yes
- Published
- 26 Feb 2026
Original amount 212,850 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Feb 2026.
- Cal/OSHA cites San Jose sheet metal company more than $212,000 following amputation accident (DIR) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
11 Feb 2026 Disney DTC, LLC und ABC Enterprises, Inc. (The Walt Disney Company)California: $2.75 million against Disney over incomplete opt-outs for streaming €2.31m
Disney implemented objections to the sale and sharing of data only for individual services or devices rather than across the whole account, continued to disclose data via embedded ad-tech providers and offered no opt-out in connected TV apps. It was the largest CCPA settlement at the time of the agreement with the Attorney General of California.
An opt-out must take effect across all services, devices and integrated third-party providers of an account.
- Authority / court
- Attorney General of California (California Department of Justice)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Cookies and tracking
- Legal basis
- California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Media and online platforms
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 11 Feb 2026
Original amount 2,750,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Feb 2026.
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
4 Feb 2026 Alco Harvesting LLC dba Bonipak Produce Inc. und verbundene UnternehmenBonipak: $6.175 million for farmworkers over undisclosed paid sick leave €5.22m
Following the COVID death of a farmworker in employer-provided housing, the California Labor Commissioner's Office sued the agricultural business in Santa Maria in 2021: more than 10,000 farmworkers, including H-2A seasonal workers, had not been informed of their entitlement to paid sick leave; in addition, there was unpaid travel time as well as overtime and minimum wage violations. The settlement of $6,175,000 (of which $4.2 million goes directly to workers) includes posting and reporting obligations.
Information obligations towards seasonal workers are not a formality – companies that leave workers in the dark about paid sick leave are liable for the consequences.
- Authority / court
- California Labor Commissioner's Office (Division of Labor Standards Enforcement)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
- Legal basis
- California Labor Code (Paid Sick Leave, COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave, Mindestlohn, Überstunden)
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Food and agriculture
- Published
- 4 Feb 2026
Original amount 6,175,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 Feb 2026.
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
30 Dec 2025 Rickenbacher Data LLC (Datamasters)CPPA: $45,000 against data broker Datamasters over failure to register €38,275
Without registering as a data broker, the Texas reseller traded in the names and contact details of millions of people, sorted by illnesses such as Alzheimer's or addiction, by age, presumed ethnicity and political views. In addition to the fine, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) requires it to stop selling data on all Californians.
Companies that buy or sell address lists for advertising must check registration obligations – health-related lists are particularly risky.
- Authority / court
- California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Marketing and consent
- Legal basis
- California Delete Act (Registrierungspflicht für Datenhändler)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Other
- Published
- 8 Jan 2026
Original amount 45,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Dec 2025.
- CalPrivacy Data Broker Enforcement Strike Force: enforcement actions Press release of an authority
- CPPA Order of Decision: Rickenbacher Data LLC d/b/a Datamasters (ENF25-172-D-DA) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
21 Oct 2025 Winsor Maintenance Inc., Main Source Group, Inc. u. a. sowie OptumCare Management LLC (Auftraggeberin)Cleaning companies/OptumCare: 438,204 USD – overtime and missed breaks €377,534
More than 90 cleaners in industrial, laboratory and healthcare facilities often worked beyond scheduled hours without overtime pay, received no compensation for split shifts and travel time and were unable to take breaks because of excessive workloads. A web of companies owned by the Hong family concealed the employer; the Notice of Final Findings of 21 October 2025 established 438,204 USD, with OptumCare jointly liable as the client.
Clients of cleaning and service providers should check working hours and breaks at the provider – otherwise they are jointly liable.
- Authority / court
- California Labor Commissioner's Office (Division of Labor Standards Enforcement)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Working time
- Legal basis
- California Labor Code § 2810.3; Overtime, Split Shift, Meal and Rest Periods, Mindestlohn
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Liability of senior managers
- Members of the owning family and an acquaintance cited personally.
- Published
- 24 Nov 2025
Original amount 438,204 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 21 Oct 2025.
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
26 Sep 2025 Tractor Supply CompanyCPPA: $1.35 million against Tractor Supply over missing opt-out mechanisms €1.16m
The rural retail giant inadequately informed consumers and job applicants about their rights, offered no effective means of opting out of the sale and sharing of data (including no Global Privacy Control) and passed data on to third parties without the required contracts. An officer must certify compliance annually for four years, as required by the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA).
Privacy notices must also cover job applicants, and browser opt-out signals such as GPC must be implemented technically.
- Authority / court
- California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 30 Sep 2025
Original amount 1,350,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Sep 2025.
- CPPA: Tractor Supply Company enforcement decision Press release of an authority
- CPPA Order of Decision and Stipulated Final Order: Tractor Supply Company (ENF24-M-TR-04) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
4 Sep 2025 Midri, Inc. (Restaurant J BBQ, Los Angeles)Restaurant J BBQ: 680,238 USD – breaks denied, split shifts without premium €584,046
The Koreatown restaurant regularly denied 48 employees meal and rest breaks, required them to remain available for guests even during the lunch break, did not pay split-shift premiums and did not pay all wages. The California Labor Commissioner’s Office imposed 680,238 USD, of which 538,638 USD for the benefit of the employees.
In the restaurant trade, breaks must be actively scheduled and documented – being on call for guests during the break turns it into working time.
Break arrangements in the restaurant trade
- Authority / court
- California Labor Commissioner's Office (Division of Labor Standards Enforcement)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Working time
- Legal basis
- California Labor Code (Meal and Rest Periods, Split Shift Premium, Lohnabrechnung)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Food and agriculture
- Liability of senior managers
- Owner Byung Kwan Lee named in the announcement.
Original amount 680,238 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 Sep 2025.
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
1 Jul 2025 Healthline Media LLCCalifornia: $1.55 million against Healthline over disclosure of illness-related article titles €1.31m
Despite objections, the health portal continued to pass data to advertising partners and transmitted article titles suggestive of diagnoses for targeted advertising; the consent banner did not stop the tracking. In addition, the required contractual clauses with advertising partners were missing. The settlement was reached with the Attorney General of California.
Test consent banners technically: if rejecting does not actually switch off tracking, that is misleading and unlawful.
- Authority / court
- Attorney General of California (California Department of Justice)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Cookies and tracking
- Legal basis
- California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), Unfair Competition Law
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Media and online platforms
- Published
- 1 Jul 2025
Original amount 1,550,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 Jul 2025.
- Attorney General Bonta Announces Largest CCPA Settlement to Date, Secures $1.55 Million from Healthline.com Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
6 May 2025 Todd Snyder, Inc.Todd Snyder: 345,178 USD – tracking opt-out ineffective for 40 days €304,793
For 40 days, the fashion retailer’s misconfigured privacy portal did not process objections to the sale and sharing of personal data; in addition, the company required too much data and identity verification before an opt-out. The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) imposed 345,178 USD and required correct configuration of consent management and employee training.
A consent management platform does not relieve companies of responsibility: check regularly whether opt-outs are actually implemented technically.
Configuration and monitoring of consent management platforms
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA), Board
- Area of law
- Data protection · Cookies and tracking
- Legal basis
- California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
Original amount 345,178 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 6 May 2025.
- CPPA Orders Clothing Retailer Todd Snyder to Pay Six-Figure Fine, Overhaul Privacy Practices (06.05.2025) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
7 Mar 2025 American Honda Motor Co., Inc.CPPA: $632,500 against Honda over obstructed privacy requests €582,573
Honda required excessive information for opt-out requests, used a cookie tool without equivalent choices, made it harder to appoint authorised agents and passed data on to ad-tech firms without the required contracts. The order of the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) requires, among other things, a simplified procedure and training for employees.
Do not undermine data subject rights through form hurdles or asymmetric consent dialogues.
- Authority / court
- California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Automotive
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 12 Mar 2025
Original amount 632,500 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 Mar 2025.
- CPPA: Enforcement action against American Honda Motor Co. Press release of an authority
- CPPA Order of Decision: American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (ENF23-V-HO-2) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
16 Sep 2024 Fünf Wingstop-Filialgesellschaften in Kern County (Inhaber Clinton Lewis)Wingstop franchisee: 1.7 million USD – overtime evaded by splitting up companies €1.53m
The franchisee ran five Wingstop outlets in Bakersfield as separate companies and deployed employees at several locations on the same day. As a result, they lost out on overtime premiums after eight hours a day or 40 hours a week, premiums for missed meal breaks, paid travel time and the higher minimum wage for larger employers; the settlement of 1.7 million USD concerns around 550 employees.
Working time is added up across all locations of the same employer – splitting into separate companies does not protect against overtime obligations.
- Authority / court
- California Labor Commissioner's Office (Division of Labor Standards Enforcement)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Working time
- Legal basis
- California Labor Code (Overtime, Meal Periods, Mindestlohn)
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Food and agriculture
- Culpability
- intentional
- Liability of senior managers
- Owner Clinton Lewis personally responsible.
Original amount 1,700,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Sep 2024.
- California DIR News Release 2024-73: California Labor Commissioner’s Office reaches $1.7 million settlement in Wingstop wage theft case (16.09.2024) Press release of an authority
- California DIR News Release 2023-68: California Labor Commissioner Cites Five Winstop Fast Food Restaurants and Their Owner More Than $3 Million (28.09.2023) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
18 Jun 2024 Amazon.com Services, LLCAmazon: 5.9 million USD – undisclosed productivity quotas in two warehouses (Warehouse Quotas Law) €5.51m
Amazon did not inform employees at two warehouses in Moreno Valley and Redlands in writing of the productivity quotas that applied; the authority regarded the peer-to-peer rating system used as a quota within the meaning of the law, which prohibits quotas that prevent breaks, toilet visits or compliance with health and safety. For 59,017 violations between October 2023 and March 2024, the Labor Commissioner’s Office imposed 5,901,700 USD.
Disclose performance metrics for employees, and do not let them effectively prevent breaks – even when they come in the guise of peer ratings.
Making productivity quotas and break rights transparent (managers)
- Authority / court
- California Labor Commissioner's Office (Division of Labor Standards Enforcement)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Working time
- Legal basis
- California Warehouse Quotas Law (AB 701, Labor Code §§ 2100 ff.); Labor Code § 2699(f)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
Original amount 5,901,700 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 Jun 2024.
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
12 Jun 2024 Edgewood Residential Facility (Los Angeles)Edgewood Residential: 658,948 USD – care workers up to 24 hours without breaks €612,121
At the care facility, employees worked up to 24 hours a day, seven days a week, were not allowed to leave the premises, had to work through breaks and received no overtime pay. The settlement of 658,948 USD comprises 608,948 USD for 34 employees (including overtime and break premiums) and 50,000 USD in civil penalties.
Round-the-clock shifts without rest periods are a recurring pattern in care – rosters need checks against maximum working hours and breaks.
Working time limits and breaks in care
- Authority / court
- California Labor Commissioner's Office (Division of Labor Standards Enforcement)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Working time
- Legal basis
- California Labor Code (Überstunden, Meal and Rest Periods, Mindestlohn)
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Healthcare
Original amount 658,948 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Jun 2024.
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
8 Feb 2024 La Mina De Oro Inc., KD Distributors, Inc. und Desire Fragrances Inc.La Mina de Oro: 1 million USD – warehouse workers without daily overtime and genuine breaks €929,541
Warehouse and sales staff were not paid for all hours worked, received overtime premiums only after 40 hours a week instead of after eight hours a day, and had to remain available to customers during rest and meal breaks. Following citations issued in 2021, the California Labor Commissioner’s Office agreed a settlement of 1 million USD for 107 employees.
A break during which employees must remain available is legally working time – break arrangements must ensure genuine interruptions.
Breaks are time off work – not standby
- Authority / court
- California Labor Commissioner's Office (Division of Labor Standards Enforcement)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Working time
- Legal basis
- California Labor Code (Daily Overtime, Meal and Rest Periods, Mindestlohn)
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
Original amount 1,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 8 Feb 2024.
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
21 Nov 2023 Calcrete Construction Inc.Calcrete Construction: over 1 million USD – up to 68 hours a week without overtime pay Other
Employees of the Glendale construction company regularly worked 45 to 68 hours a week without being paid for overtime; there was also no paid sick leave and no proper wage statements. The California Labor Commissioner’s Office concluded a settlement with the company of more than 1 million USD for the benefit of 249 construction workers.
Anyone allowing long working weeks must also record and pay for them in full – systematic unrecorded overtime comes to light in every wage audit.
- Authority / court
- California Labor Commissioner's Office (Division of Labor Standards Enforcement)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Working time
- Legal basis
- California Labor Code (Überstunden, Paid Sick Leave, Lohnabrechnung)
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Construction and real estate
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link