Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific: 1,838 cases from 37 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

2cases from 1 jurisdiction
€1.49mTotal of monetary amounts
€1.13mLargest single case: Jetstar Airways Pty Limited
€744,280Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Strafgericht, in der Quelle nicht benannt (Anklage: Commerce Commission) €1.13m 76 % · 1 case
  2. High Court Auckland (Klage: Commerce Commission) €355,800 24 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Consumer protection and online retail €1.13m 76 % · 1 case
  2. Competition law €355,800 24 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. Jetstar Airways Pty Limited €1.13m 76 % · 1 case
  2. Aramex New Zealand Holdings Limited €355,800 24 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20240–
Q1 20250–
Q2 20250–
Q3 20251€1.13m
Q4 20250–
Q1 20261€355,800
Q2 20260–
Q3 20260–
Q4 20260–

2 cases

4 Mar 2026 Aramex New Zealand Holdings LimitedAramex: 700,000 NZD for customer allocation in a reseller agreement New ZealandCartels and collusion €355,800

In 2021 the courier company concluded an agreement with a competitor acting as reseller that allocated customers and fixed prices, and gave effect to the non-compete clause on one occasion; the wording had been copied from an older Fastway template. In civil proceedings brought by the Commerce Commission (ComCom, New Zealand's competition authority), the High Court on 4 March 2026 approved the jointly proposed penalty, allegedly of 700,000 NZD (starting point 1 million NZD, 30% reduction).

What organisations can take from it

Contract templates should be reviewed regularly for competition law risks before they are copied for new partners.

Relevance to training and awareness

Competition law review of contract templates

Authority / court
High Court Auckland (Klage: Commerce Commission)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Commerce Act 1986, s 30
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
No previous warnings or contraventions, voluntary provision of documents and interviews, early admission and remorse, new agreements without the clause and a new competition law compliance programme in New Zealand and Australia.
Liability of senior managers
The agreement was prepared from a template by the national sales manager; a more senior employee signed it without reviewing its content.
Published
4 Mar 2026

Original amount 700,000 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 Mar 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

1 Sep 2025 Jetstar Airways Pty LimitedJetstar: 2,250,000 NZD for false statements on compensation rights New ZealandConsumer protection and online retail €1.13m

Between 1 January 2022 and 22 March 2024 the airline gave passengers false information in individual replies, automated emails and on its website about their compensation rights under the Civil Aviation Act for delays and cancellations within its control, so that valid claims were refused. After pleading guilty to 20 representative charges, it was fined 2,250,000 NZD. The Commerce Commission (ComCom, New Zealand's competition and consumer authority) had already issued Jetstar with compliance advice for similar statements before the offending period.

What organisations can take from it

Standard replies and website texts on customer rights must reflect statutory liability correctly, otherwise they become a breach in their own right.

Relevance to training and awareness

Accurate information on statutory customer rights in complaint handling

Authority / court
Strafgericht, in der Quelle nicht benannt (Anklage: Commerce Commission)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail
Legal basis
Fair Trading Act 1986, s 13(i)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Mitigating circumstances
Following the Commerce Commission's intervention, Jetstar compensated 2,692 affected customers with a total of 1,039,390 NZD.
Published
1 Sep 2025

Original amount 2,250,000 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 Sep 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial