Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and Middle East: 1,929 cases from 40 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by regionAll jurisdictions
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by company- Anonymised companies 20 cases 19 % · €93.2m
- Apple 2 cases 2 % · €500m
- „Смарт Софт“ ЕООД 1 case 1 % · €19,128
- Advanced Computer Software Group Ltd 1 case 1 % · €3.68m
- Alphabet Inc. (Google) 1 case 1 % ·
- Alten SA; Bertrandt SAS (mit Bertrandt AG); Expleo France SAS (mit Expleo Group SAS) 1 case 1 % · €29.5m
- Apple Distribution International Limited 1 case 1 % · €451,452
- Apple Distribution International Limited; Apple Operations International Limited; Apple Inc. 1 case 1 % · €150m
- Apple Inc. 1 case 1 % · €23.2m
- Apple Inc., Apple Distribution International Ltd, Apple Italia S.r.l. 1 case 1 % · €98.6m
- 73 more73 cases
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 2023 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2024 | 1 | – |
| Q1 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2026 | 0 | – |
1 case
18 Dec 2024 Rytr LLCFTC bans Rytr’s AI review generator – order set aside a year later overturned
According to the complaint of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC, the US consumer protection authority), the AI writing service offered a “Testimonial & Review” feature that generated detailed customer reviews with entirely invented details from brief, generic input; individual users produced hundreds to tens of thousands of reviews with it. With the final settlement order (3–2 vote), the FTC prohibited Rytr from offering any service for generating reviews. On 22 December 2025, the FTC set the order aside again with Rytr’s consent (2–0 vote): the facts alleged in the complaint did not support a violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, and the order unduly burdened AI innovation, contrary to the Trump Administration’s AI Executive Order and AI Action Plan.
Take responsibility for the authenticity of AI-generated reviews you publish – in the Rytr case, the FTC ultimately saw no violation in merely offering an AI writing tool.
- Authority / court
- Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
- Area of law
- Consumer protection and online retail · Fake reviews
- Legal basis
- Section 5 FTC Act (Mittel zur Täuschung bereitgestellt)
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- overturned
- Sector
- Telecoms, IT and software
- Published
- 18 Dec 2024
- FTC Approves Final Order against Rytr, Seller of an AI “Testimonial & Review” Service Press release of an authority
- FTC Reopens and Sets Aside Rytr Final Order in Response to the Trump Administration’s AI Action Plan Press release of an authority
- FTC Announces Crackdown on Deceptive AI Claims and Schemes Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link