Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

8cases from 1 jurisdiction
€6.93mTotal of monetary amounts (7 cases with an amount)
€3.68mLargest single case: Advanced Computer Software Group Ltd
€451,452Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) €5.32m 77 % · 6 cases
  2. HM Treasury, Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) €1.61m 23 % · 2 cases

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Data protection €5.32m 77 % · 6 cases
  2. Sanctions and export control €1.61m 23 % · 2 cases

Who?

by company
  1. Advanced Computer Software Group Ltd €3.68m 53 % · 1 case
  2. LastPass UK Ltd €1.39m 20 % · 1 case
  3. Sabre Global Technologies Limited €1.16m 17 % · 1 case
  4. Apple Distribution International Limited €451,452 7 % · 1 case
  5. Anonymised companies €246,514 4 % · 4 cases

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20221–
20233€246,514
20240–
20252€5.07m
20262€1.61m

8 cases

26 May 2026 Sabre Global Technologies LimitedSabre subsidiary accepted payments from designated Ural Airlines United KingdomBreaches of sanctions and embargoes €1.16m

The provider of a travel booking system continued to provide services to Ural Airlines, designated in May 2022, requested payments of around 906,600 USD and, after the funds were frozen by the bank, looked for alternative payment routes, which HM Treasury's Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) regarded as circumvention. A lack of escalation during a change of roles, vacant leadership positions in legal and compliance, policies focused on US law and screening that did not flag the designation all contributed. According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2024, the company had around 150 employees.

What organisations can take from it

If an existing customer is designated, escalate this immediately; looking for alternative payment routes after the bank has frozen funds is itself a breach.

Relevance to training and awareness

Responding to new designations of existing customers, prohibition of circumvention

Authority / court
HM Treasury, Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, regs. 13, 14, 19
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Employees
50 to 249
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary disclosure (31 October 2022) and full cooperation; settlement under the new settlement procedure
Published
17 Jun 2026

Original amount 1,000,920.59 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 May 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

19 Mar 2026 Apple Distribution International LimitedOFSI: GBP 390,000 settlement penalty for Apple Distribution International over payments to an app developer United KingdomBreaches of sanctions and embargoes €451,452

On 19 March 2026 OFSI imposed a monetary penalty of GBP 390,000 on Ireland-based Apple Distribution International Limited by way of settlement. According to OFSI's findings, the company, which pays out revenues to software developers on an app marketplace, instructed two payments totalling GBP 635,618.75 in June and July 2022 from a UK bank account to a Russian app developer owned by a designated entity, and did not cancel the instructions. OFSI identified reliance on developers' self-declarations and on third-party data, among other things, as causes. The company had voluntarily disclosed the payments on 4 October 2022. The settlement followed a notice of intent of 11 November 2025 and was reached under the settlement process introduced in February 2026; OFSI made no findings against the parent company. Source: Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI), HM Treasury, "Imposition of monetary penalty: Apple Distribution International Limited", 30 March 2026, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/imposition-of-monetary-penalty-apple-distribution-international-limited. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 (https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/).

Authority / court
HM Treasury, Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, reg. 12; Geldbuße nach s. 146 Policing and Crime Act 2017 (Settlement)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Published
30 Mar 2026

Original amount 390,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Mar 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

20 Nov 2025 LastPass UK LtdICO: £1.2 million against LastPass UK after breach of backup database United KingdomData breaches and data security €1.39m

In 2022, an attacker first compromised an employee's company laptop and then the personal laptop of a senior employee, whose master password he captured using a keylogger. Because the personal and business password vaults were linked via the same master password, he obtained the access and decryption keys stored there and stole data on up to 1.6 million UK users from the backup database. According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2025, the company had around 35 employees.

What organisations can take from it

Never keep critical keys on employees' personal devices or in their personal accounts – access must be technically separated and restricted.

Relevance to training and awareness

Separation of personal and work devices and credentials

Authority / court
Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
UK GDPR Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 32 Abs. 1 lit. f
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Employees
Under 50
Culpability
negligent
Published
11 Dec 2025

Original amount 1,228,283 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 20 Nov 2025.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

26 Mar 2025 Advanced Computer Software Group LtdICO: £3 million against NHS service provider Advanced after ransomware without MFA United KingdomData processors €3.68m

Advanced, a processor for the NHS and care providers, was attacked with ransomware in August 2022 via a customer account without multi-factor authentication; services such as NHS 111 were disrupted. Data on 79,404 people was stolen, including instructions on how to gain entry to the homes of 890 people receiving care at home.

What organisations can take from it

MFA must apply to every single access point without gaps – one unprotected account is enough for attackers.

Authority / court
Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
Area of law
Data protection · Data processors
Legal basis
UK GDPR Art. 32 Abs. 1 (als Auftragsverarbeiter)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
Provisionally £6.09 million; reduced, among other things, for proactive cooperation with the NCSC and the National Crime Agency.
Published
27 Mar 2025

Original amount 3,076,320 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Mar 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Nov 2023 a UK mobile and broadband lead generatorICO: GBP 70,000 fine for lead generator over more than a million marketing texts and emails without consent United KingdomMarketing and consentanonymised €79,982

On 16 November 2023 the ICO fined a UK company that generates mobile and broadband leads for communications providers GBP 70,000. According to the ICO's findings, between 1 January and 11 November 2021 subscribers received 1,164,877 marketing texts and emails sent by the company without valid consent. Some of the consents came from third-party websites; the ICO considered them not freely given, because people could only agree by accepting calls, emails and texts together, and in some cases neither specific nor informed. The ICO became aware of the company through 1,103 complaints to the 7726 spam reporting service and treated the conduct as a breach of regulation 22 of PECR. Under the notice, early payment reduced the fine to GBP 56,000.

Authority / court
Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
Regulation 22 PECR; section 55A DPA 1998 (Geldbuße)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software

Original amount 70,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Nov 2023.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 16 Nov 2025 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

26 Oct 2023 a UK marketing text platformICO: GBP 65,000 fine for text messaging platform over 2.3 million marketing texts United KingdomMarketing and consentanonymised €74,567

On 26 October 2023 the ICO fined a UK platform for sending marketing texts GBP 65,000 and served an enforcement notice on the same day. According to the ICO's findings, between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2022 subscribers received 2,330,423 marketing texts without valid consent; the company sent 24,309 of them itself, and its clients sent the remaining 2,306,114 over lines that it allowed them to use. The company relied on legitimate interests rather than consent, and the messages it sent itself did not identify the sender. The ICO treated this as a breach of regulations 22 and 23 of PECR. Under the notice, early payment reduced the fine to GBP 52,000.

Authority / court
Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
Regulation 22 (einschließlich 22(4)) und 23 PECR; section 55A DPA 1998 (Geldbuße); section 40 DPA 1998 (Enforcement Notice) wegen Regulation 22 PECR
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software

Original amount 65,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Oct 2023.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 26 Oct 2025 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

9 May 2023 a UK business telecoms providerICO: GBP 80,000 fine for telecoms provider over marketing calls to businesses United KingdomMarketing and consentanonymised €91,965

On 9 May 2023 the ICO fined a UK provider of business telecommunications solutions GBP 80,000 and served an enforcement notice on the same day. According to the ICO's findings, between 13 September 2021 and 31 January 2022 the company made 72,682 unsolicited marketing calls to subscribers registered with the TPS or CTPS. The ICO treated this as a breach of regulation 21 of PECR. Under the notice, payment by 8 June 2023 reduced the fine to GBP 64,000. The ICO published the case on 16 May 2023.

Authority / court
Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
Regulation 21 PECR (Enforcement Notice: regulation 21(1)(a) und (b)); section 55A DPA 1998 (Geldbuße); section 40 DPA 1998 (Enforcement Notice)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software

Original amount 80,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 9 May 2023.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 9 May 2025 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

20 Sep 2022 a UK telecoms and broadband providerICO: reprimand for telecoms provider over late subject access requests United KingdomData subject rights and transparencyanonymised Reprimand or warning

On 20 September 2022 the ICO issued a reprimand to a UK telecoms and broadband provider. According to the ICO's findings, between 1 July and 31 December 2021 the company failed to answer 14 per cent (1,316) of the subject access requests it received on time; in the same period the company received 493 complaints about its handling of such requests, 95 per cent of them about delays. In 2021 the ICO itself received 125 complaints about the company's subject access compliance, 51 per cent of all complaints it received about the company that year. The ICO found infringements of Articles 12(3), 15(1) and 15(3) UK GDPR.

Authority / court
Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
Area of law
Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
Legal basis
Art. 12(3), 15(1) und 15(3) UK GDPR; Verwarnung nach Art. 58 UK GDPR
Action
Reprimand or warning
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Sources

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 20 Sep 2024 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial