Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

2cases from 1 jurisdiction
€19.4mTotal of monetary amounts (1 case with an amount)
€19.4mLargest single case: Swisscom (Schweiz) AG
€19.4mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Wettbewerbskommission (WEKO) €19.4m 100 % · 1 case
  2. Eidgenössischer Datenschutz- und Öffentlichkeitsbeauftragter (EDÖB) — 0 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Competition law €19.4m 100 % · 1 case
  2. Data protection — 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. Swisscom (Schweiz) AG €19.4m 100 % · 1 case
  2. Xplain AG; Bundesamt für Polizei (fedpol); Bundesamt für Zoll und Grenzsicherheit (BAZG) — 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20231€19.4m
Q1 20240—
Q2 20241—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20260—
Q3 20260—

2 cases

4 Dec 2023 Swisscom (Schweiz) AGWEKO: CHF 18.4 million against Swisscom over fibre network roll-out strategy SwitzerlandAbuse of market power €19.4m

Swisscom expanded its fibre-optic network in such a way that competitors were not given Layer 1 access from the local exchanges. WEKO considered this to be an abuse of a dominant position, imposed a sanction of CHF 18,362,014, required Swisscom to retrofit the network and imposed procedural costs of CHF 927,307.

What organisations can take from it

Dominant network operators must assess infrastructure decisions for their consequences for competitors' access.

Authority / court
Wettbewerbskommission (WEKO)
Area of law
Competition law · Abuse of market power
Legal basis
Art. 7 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Abs. 2 lit. a und e KG, Art. 49a Abs. 1 KG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Employees
10,000 or more

Original amount 18,362,014 CHF, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 Dec 2023.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

1 May 2024 Xplain AG; Bundesamt für Polizei (fedpol); Bundesamt für Zoll und Grenzsicherheit (BAZG)FDPIC: data protection infringements at Xplain, fedpol and FOCBS after ransomware attack SwitzerlandData processors Other

Following the hacker attack on the IT service provider Xplain, the Swiss Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner (Eidgenössischer Datenschutz- und Öffentlichkeitsbeauftragter, EDÖB) found that personal data of the Federal Office of Police (fedpol) and the Federal Office for Customs and Border Security (BAZG) had reached Xplain via support processes without the necessary data protection safeguards. Xplain subsequently retained the data in breach of data protection law and partly in breach of contract.

What organisations can take from it

Real data does not belong in service providers' support and test environments – clients must control disclosure and deletion.

Relevance to training and awareness

Passing real data to service providers for support

Authority / court
Eidgenössischer Datenschutz- und Öffentlichkeitsbeauftragter (EDÖB)
Area of law
Data protection · Data processors
Legal basis
Datenschutzgesetz (DSG)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Published
1 May 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial