Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,004 cases from 43 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by authority- Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC) €240,207 100 % · 2 cases
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by companyWhen?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 2023 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2025 | 2 | €240,207 |
| Q1 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2026 | 0 | – |
2 cases
31 Oct 2025 Air Sino-Euro Associates Travel Pte. Ltd.Air Sino-Euro: 47,000 SGD – no data protection officer, no internal rules, data leak €31,252
After a cyberattack on the travel agency became public in December 2023, data on 336,759 individuals in its booking system was affected, in some cases including full images of identity cards, passports and birth certificates; part of the data was exfiltrated. The Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC, Singapore's data protection authority) found negligent breaches of the Accountability Obligation – a data protection officer appointed only in April 2024, and apart from the customer-facing privacy policy no internal policies, no complaints process and no information to staff – and of the Protection Obligation, because there were no contracts with the IT vendors covering security tasks, no security reviews and no multi-factor authentication, and the server was still running the unsupported Windows Server 2012. It imposed 47,000 SGD, rejected objections based on COVID-19 losses and comparable cases, and directed among other things policies, security clauses in vendor contracts and a penetration test by a provider licensed by the Cyber Security Agency (CSA).
An outward-facing privacy policy is no substitute for a designated data protection officer or for internal rules that staff know and that apply in day-to-day work.
Internal data protection policies, communicating them to staff, and password rules
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- Sections 11(3) und 12 PDPA 2012 (Accountability Obligation); Section 24 PDPA (Protection Obligation); Section 48J(1)(a) PDPA (Financial Penalty); Section 48I PDPA (Directions)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- Voluntary early admission of the breaches (treated as significantly mitigating) and prompt, effective remediation.
- Published
- 8 Jan 2026
Original amount 47,000 SGD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 31 Oct 2025.
- PDPC – Enforcement Decisions: Breach of the Accountability and Protection Obligations by Air Sino-Euro Associates Travel Pte Ltd (veröffentlicht 08.01.2026) Enforcement database of an authority
- PDPC – Decision [2025] SGPDPC [5], Air Sino-Euro Associates Travel Pte. Ltd., Case No. DP-2312-C1857 (31.10.2025), PDF Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
28 Oct 2025 Marina Bay Sands Pte. Ltd.Marina Bay Sands: 315,000 SGD after configuration error in middleware migration €208,955
When API configurations were manually transferred to a new middleware platform (September 2022 to March 2023), a single employee in sole charge omitted an app identifier, so token verification did not apply to the web page of the ArtScience Friends museum programme for at least six months; an attacker exploited this in October 2023 and retrieved data on 665,495 members of the Sands Rewards Lifestyle loyalty programme, which was then offered for sale on the dark web. The Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC, Singapore's data protection authority) held that the resort had negligently breached the Protection Obligation by relying on this one employee without independent checks or automation. It reduced the provisionally intended 450,000 SGD to 315,000 SGD after the company's representations; no directions were issued because remediation had already been carried out.
Security-critical configuration steps when migrating large data sets must not depend on a single person without independent checks or automation.
Human error in manual IT changes: four-eyes principle and automation
- Authority / court
- Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- Section 24 Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (Protection Obligation); Section 48J PDPA (Financial Penalty)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Culpability
- negligent
- Repeat case
- no
- Mitigating circumstances
- Otherwise adequate security arrangements, containment on the day of discovery, admission under the Expedited Decision Procedure, cooperation and voluntary notification of all affected individuals.
- Published
- 28 Oct 2025
Original amount 315,000 SGD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Oct 2025.
- PDPC – Enforcement Decisions: Breach of the Protection Obligation by Marina Bay Sands Pte Ltd (veröffentlicht 28.10.2025) Enforcement database of an authority
- PDPC – Decision [2025] SGPDPC 6, Marina Bay Sands Pte. Ltd., Case No. DP-2310-C1622 (28.10.2025), PDF Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link