Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

Switzerland Other Clear all filters

2cases from 1 jurisdiction

€82.3mTotal of monetary amounts

€82.1mLargest single case: a Swiss security technology provider

€41.1mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

by amount by number of cases

Where?

by authority

Bundesanwaltschaft (BA) €82.1m 100 % · 1 case
Wettbewerbskommission (WEKO) €122,929 0 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

Who?

by company

Anonymised companies €82.1m 100 % · 1 case
Aktiengesellschaft Hallenstadion Zürich (AGH); Ticketcorner AG €122,929 0 % · 1 case

When?

per year, by date of decision

Trend
Period	Cases	Total
2023	1	€82.1m
2024	0	–
2025	1	€122,929
2026	0	–

2 cases

Newest first Highest amounts

15 Dec 2025 Aktiengesellschaft Hallenstadion Zürich (AGH); Ticketcorner AGWEKO fines Hallenstadion Zurich and Ticketcorner over ticketing clause SwitzerlandAbuse of market power €122,929

At the end of 2008 Aktiengesellschaft Hallenstadion Zürich and Ticketcorner AG agreed that the arena would only be let to organisers selling at least 50% of tickets through Ticketcorner, which hindered other ticketing providers. After the Federal Supreme Court found a competition-law infringement in 2020 and remitted the case (2C_113/2017), the Wettbewerbskommission (WEKO, Swiss Competition Commission) classed both companies' conduct in 2009 to 2011 as abuse of a dominant position and, by decision of 15 December 2025, fined the Hallenstadion around CHF 50,000 and Ticketcorner around CHF 65,000. The arena operator had concluded an amicable settlement; the decision can be appealed to the Federal Administrative Court.

What organisations can take from it

Exclusivity clauses between strong market players remain a competition risk, even if the proceedings only end years later.

Relevance to training and awareness

Exclusivity clauses and tying by dominant undertakings

Authority / court: Wettbewerbskommission (WEKO)
Area of law: Competition law · Abuse of market power
Legal basis: Kartellgesetz (KG): Missbrauch einer marktbeherrschenden Stellung; Rückweisung BGer 2C_113/2017 vom 12.02.2020
Action: Fine
Status of proceedings: unknown
Sector: Other
Mitigating circumstances: The arena operator concluded an amicable settlement with WEKO.
Published: 22 Jan 2026

Original amount 115,000 CHF, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Dec 2025.

Sources

WEKO-Medienmitteilung vom 22.01.2026: WEKO büsst Hallenstadion und Ticketcorner Press release of an authority
Newsroom-Schnittstelle der Bundesverwaltung: Volltext der WEKO-Medienmitteilung vom 22.01.2026 (weko_13429) Press release of an authority

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

27 Apr 2023 a Swiss security technology providerPenalty order: CHF 81m against security technology provider for bribery in South America SwitzerlandBribery of public officialsanonymised €82.1m

Because of deficiencies in corporate governance, risk management and compliance, employees of a Swiss security technology provider were able to bribe public officials in connection with business in Brazil, Colombia and Venezuela. The Bundesanwaltschaft (BA, Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland) convicted the company by summary penalty order and imposed a fine of CHF 1,000,000 and a compensatory claim of CHF 80,000,000, CHF 81 million in total. The penalty order against the company is final because the company waived its right to object.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone selling to state bodies in high-risk markets needs effective sales controls, or a large compensatory claim will follow the fine.

Relevance to training and awareness

Bribery of foreign public officials in sales; compliance organisation

Authority / court: Bundesanwaltschaft (BA)
Area of law: Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis: Art. 102 Abs. 2 StGB i.V.m. Art. 322septies StGB; Ersatzforderung nach Art. 71 Abs. 1 StGB
Action: Fine
Status of proceedings: final
Sector: Other
Published: 27 Apr 2023

Original amount 81,000,000 CHF, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Apr 2023.

Sources

Bundesanwaltschaft, Medienmitteilungen (Übersicht) (Entscheidung 2023) Press release of an authority

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 27 Apr 2025 · Direct link

Report an error

How the radar is compiled

Official sources only

Every case is based on a decision, press release or database of an authority or a court. Press and law-firm reports count at most as additional references.

Four-eyes check

Whoever enters a case may not approve it. A second, independent check compares company, date, amount and area of law with the source. Only then is the case published.

Comparable amounts

Amounts are converted at the ECB reference rate on the day of the decision. Each case also shows the original amount.

Corrections on record

A correction is a new version that is checked again. Every change is logged. You can report errors directly on each case.

Case texts are translated from the German original. Where a translation is not yet available, the German text is shown and marked “(German original)”. Names of authorities, laws and companies are given as in the source (company names until they are anonymised).

Company names are anonymised two years after the decision in a case, in line with the practice of many supervisory authorities. The official sources remain linked.

The radar reports on published decisions and is not legal advice. Decisions that are not yet final are marked as such where the status is known.

Embed the radar on your website

Ready for training that actually lands?