Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and Middle East: 1,929 cases from 40 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

Media and online platforms StubHub Holdings, Inc. Clear all filters

1case from 1 jurisdiction

–Total of monetary amounts (0 cases with an amount)

–Largest single case

–Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

by amount by number of cases

Where?

by region

All jurisdictions

USA 1 case 100 % ·

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

Consumer protection and online retail 1 case 100 % ·

Who?

by company

When?

per quarter, by date of decision

Trend
Period	Cases	Total
Q4 2023	0	–
Q1 2024	0	–
Q2 2024	0	–
Q3 2024	0	–
Q4 2024	0	–
Q1 2025	0	–
Q2 2025	0	–
Q3 2025	0	–
Q4 2025	0	–
Q1 2026	0	–
Q2 2026	1	–
Q3 2026	0	–
Q4 2026	0	–

1 case

Newest first Highest amounts

10 Apr 2026 StubHub Holdings, Inc.FTC: StubHub refunds 10 million USD over ticket prices shown without mandatory fees USAMisleading advertising and pricing Disgorgement of profits

According to the FTC, StubHub displayed ticket prices on its website without clearly and conspicuously stating up front the total price including all mandatory fees. The court order relies on the new FTC rule against unfair or deceptive fees and requires StubHub to pay 10 million USD for consumer refunds. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment.

What organisations can take from it

Since the FTC fees rule, the first price shown for tickets must include all mandatory fees.

Relevance to training and awareness

Total price display including mandatory fees (drip pricing)

Authority / court: Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Area of law: Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis: Section 5 FTC Act; Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees (16 C.F.R. Part 464)
Action: Disgorgement of profits
Status of proceedings: final
Sector: Media and online platforms
Published: 9 Apr 2026

Sources

FTC Cases and Proceedings: StubHub Holdings, FTC v. Enforcement database of an authority
Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction, Monetary Judgment, and Other Relief (entered), S.D.N.Y. 1:26-cv-02924 Court decision

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

How the radar is compiled

Official sources only

Every case is based on a decision, press release or database of an authority or a court. Press and law-firm reports count at most as additional references.

Four-eyes check

Whoever enters a case may not approve it. A second, independent check compares company, date, amount and area of law with the source. Only then is the case published.

Comparable amounts

Amounts are converted at the ECB reference rate on the day of the decision. Each case also shows the original amount.

Corrections on record

A correction is a new version that is checked again. Every change is logged. You can report errors directly on each case.

Case texts are translated from the German original. Where a translation is not yet available, the German text is shown and marked “(German original)”. Names of authorities, laws and companies are given as in the source (company names until they are anonymised).

Company names are anonymised two years after the decision in a case, in line with the practice of many supervisory authorities. The official sources remain linked.

The radar reports on published decisions and is not legal advice. Decisions that are not yet final are marked as such where the status is known.

Embed the radar on your website

Ready for training that actually lands?