Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by authority- Competition Commission (Hongkong) – 0 % · 2 cases
- Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD), Hongkong – 0 % · 1 case
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by company- Anonymised companies – 0 % · 2 cases
- Kangaroo Limited (Keeta) – 0 % · 1 case
When?
per year, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | – |
| 2024 | 0 | – |
| 2025 | 0 | – |
| 2026 | 1 | – |
3 cases
17 Jun 2026 Kangaroo Limited (Keeta)Keeta gives binding commitment to open up its restaurant contracts Order
On 17 June 2026 the Competition Commission (Hong Kong's competition authority) accepted a commitment from Kangaroo Limited, which operates the Keeta food delivery platform in Hong Kong and is a subsidiary of Meituan. The authority was concerned that clauses in Keeta's agreements with partner restaurants made access harder for new and small platforms and softened competition – a possible breach of the First Conduct Rule (the ban on anti-competitive agreements). Keeta had already amended the agreements voluntarily (cooperation with platforms of up to 10% market share without losing incentives, easier switching, no bar on lower prices on the restaurants' own channels and on rival platforms); with the acceptance, these changes are legally binding and enforceable by the authority until 28 December 2026.
Platforms should proactively align their exclusivity and price parity clauses with the standards the authority has already imposed on their competitors.
Exclusivity and price parity clauses of online platforms
- Authority / court
- Competition Commission (Hongkong)
- Area of law
- Competition law
- Legal basis
- Competition Ordinance (Cap. 619), s. 6 (First Conduct Rule); Annahme einer Verpflichtungszusage nach s. 60
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Media and online platforms
- Published
- 17 Jun 2026
- Competition Commission: Competition Commission accepts commitment offered by Keeta (17.06.2026) Press release of an authority
- Competition Commission: Notice regarding the Commission's acceptance of a commitment from Keeta in the Online Food Delivery Platform case (EC/12LD), 17.06.2026 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
29 Dec 2023 two Hong Kong food delivery platformsTwo food delivery platforms loosen exclusivity ties with partner restaurants Order
On 29 December 2023 the Competition Commission (Hong Kong's competition authority) accepted commitments from two food delivery platforms – the Hong Kong company of the first platform and the Hong Kong company of the second platform together with its parent company. Their agreements with partner restaurants contained exclusivity and pricing clauses which, in the authority's view, made it harder for new or small platforms to enter the market and could therefore breach the First Conduct Rule (the ban on anti-competitive agreements). The platforms must allow restaurants to work with platforms of up to 10% market share without losing the benefits granted to exclusive partners (such as lower commission rates), make switching easier and remove clauses that prohibit lower prices on the restaurants' own channels (and, for the first platform, on rival platforms); the first platform also drops the tie to its pick-up service, and the commitments run for three years.
Exclusivity and parity clauses used by platforms with market power are under competition-law scrutiny and should be reviewed regularly.
Exclusivity and price parity clauses of online platforms
- Authority / court
- Competition Commission (Hongkong)
- Area of law
- Competition law
- Legal basis
- Competition Ordinance (Cap. 619), s. 6(1) (First Conduct Rule); Annahme von Verpflichtungszusagen nach s. 60
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Media and online platforms
- Published
- 29 Dec 2023
- Competition Commission (Hongkong), Veröffentlichung der Behörde (Entscheidung 2023) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 29 Dec 2025 · Direct link
Report an error
21 Dec 2023 an online marketplace (Hong Kong entity)PCPD: enforcement notice against online marketplace after scraping of user data Order
After data of 2.6 million of the marketplace's users worldwide, including 324,232 accounts in Hong Kong, had been offered for sale on an online forum, the PCPD found that the marketplace's Hong Kong entity had breached DPP 4(1). The cause was a vulnerability in an application programming interface introduced during a system migration in January 2022; there was no privacy impact assessment, no complete code review, no thorough security assessment, no written code review policy and no effective detection measures. The PCPD issued an enforcement notice even though the systems were run centrally by the group.
A local company remains responsible for data security even where the group runs the systems centrally; migrations need a prior impact assessment and security review.
Data protection and code review during system migrations
- Authority / court
- Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD), Hongkong
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- Data Protection Principle 4(1) Schedule 1 und Section 50(1) Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap. 486)
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Media and online platforms
- Mitigating circumstances
- Prompt data breach notification to the PCPD and affected users, cooperation with the investigation, voluntary acknowledgement of its deficiencies, and technical and organisational measures taken by the group after the incident.
- Published
- 21 Dec 2023
Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 21 Dec 2025 · Direct link