Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

3cases from 1 jurisdiction
€23.4mTotal of monetary amounts (2 cases with an amount)
€11.7mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) €23.3m 99 % · 2 cases
  2. Garante per la protezione dei dati personali €120,000 1 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Competition law €23.3m 99 % · 1 case
  2. Data protection €120,000 1 % · 1 case
  3. Environment and sustainability — 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. Amica Chips S.p.A., Pata S.p.A., Preziosi Food S.p.A. €23.3m 99 % · 1 case
  2. Pioneer Hi-Bred Italia Sementi s.r.l. €120,000 1 % · 1 case
  3. Acqua Minerale San Benedetto S.p.A. — 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20251—
Q4 20251€120,000
Q1 20260—
Q2 20261€23.3m
Q3 20260—

3 cases

28 Apr 2026 Amica Chips S.p.A., Pata S.p.A., Preziosi Food S.p.A.Italy: 23.3 million EUR against Amica Chips, Pata and Preziosi Food over snack cartel ItalyCartels and collusion €23.3m

In a secret, continuing agreement, three manufacturers of salty snacks and crisps divided up among themselves the supply of private-label snacks to food retailers. Fines: Amica Chips 8,239,210 EUR, Pata 7,555,387 EUR, Preziosi Food 7,503,550 EUR; this was the first time Italy's competition authority (Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, AGCM) applied its settlement procedure.

What organisations can take from it

Retailers' tenders for private labels are competition – coordinated sham bids to retailers constitute a cartel.

Relevance to training and awareness

Sham bids in retailers' private-label tenders

Authority / court
Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 101 AEUV; Art. 14-quater Gesetz 287/1990 (Settlement)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Mitigating circumstances
Leniency reduction for Pata and Amica Chips; 10 % settlement discount for all
Published
28 Apr 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

18 Dec 2025 Pioneer Hi-Bred Italia Sementi s.r.l.Pioneer Hi-Bred Italia Sementi: 120,000 EUR for monitoring field staff's driving style ItalyEmployee data €120,000

At the instruction of a group company based in Switzerland, the seed company had telematics devices installed in company cars that also recorded private journeys and assigned employees scores for their driving behaviour. Italy's data protection authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali) found breaches of transparency, purpose limitation, data minimisation and employee protection rules, imposed 120,000 EUR and ordered the deletion of the data on private journeys.

What organisations can take from it

Group-wide telematics requirements must be assessed against local employment and data protection law before roll-out – especially where vehicles are also used privately.

Relevance to training and awareness

Employee monitoring through telematics

Authority / court
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
Area of law
Data protection · Employee data
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a-c, 6 Abs. 1 lit. f, 13, 28, 88; Codice privacy Art. 2-quaterdecies, 113, 114
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Mitigating circumstances
Small number of data subjects (five employees), immediate suspension of the processing.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

26 Aug 2025 Acqua Minerale San Benedetto S.p.A.AGCM: San Benedetto removes ‘CO2 neutral’ claim on Ecogreen bottles ItalyMisleading environmental and sustainability claims Other

Labels, the website and commercials for the Ecogreen line claimed that bottle production caused no greenhouse gas emissions and even had a positive effect on the environment. Following an intervention by Italy's competition and consumer protection authority (Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, AGCM) (moral suasion, case PS12596), the mineral water producer removed the claim ‘impatto zero CO2’ in mid-July 2025, revised nature motifs and added a QR code linking to sustainability information.

What organisations can take from it

‘Zero emissions’ promises on packaging can hardly be substantiated; it is better to present specific reduction steps transparently.

Relevance to training and awareness

Climate claims on packaging

Authority / court
Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Misleading environmental and sustainability claims
Legal basis
Codice del Consumo (unlautere Geschäftspraktiken), Verfahren PS12596
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary amendment of all labels and advertising materials following the authority's intervention.
Published
26 Aug 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial