Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and Middle East: 1,929 cases from 40 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by regionAll jurisdictions
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by company- Anonymised companies 9 cases 18 % · €28.6m
- Harman International Industries, Inc. 2 cases 4 % · €11.5m
- Aiotec GmbH 1 case 2 % · €13.5m
- Airbus Operations Limited 1 case 2 % · €7.48m
- Applied Materials, Inc. und Applied Materials Korea, Ltd. 1 case 2 % · €212.2m
- AV Terrace Bay Inc. 1 case 2 % · €334,587
- CalPlus GmbH, Elektronik-Kontor Messtechnik GmbH, TVW Meßtechnik GmbH 1 case 2 % · €453,000
- CNH Industrial Polska sp. z o.o., Raitech sp. z o.o., PHU Perkoz sp. z o.o. u. a. (8 Unternehmen) 1 case 2 % · €80.1m
- Coastal PVA Technology, Inc. 1 case 2 % · €1.45m
- Commercial Lines Limited (HLN Supplies) 1 case 2 % · €18,494
- 30 more30 cases
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 2023 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2025 | 1 | €634,000 |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2026 | 0 | – |
1 case
19 Mar 2025 Sennheiser electronic SE & Co KG, Sonova AGSennheiser and Sonova: €634,000 for resale price maintenance on consumer audio products €634,000
The Kartellgericht (Cartel Court) imposed fines totalling 634,000 EUR for vertical resale price maintenance on Sennheiser-brand consumer electronics audio products (headphones): 534,000 EUR on Sennheiser electronic SE & Co KG for May 2015 to February 2022 and 100,000 EUR on Sonova AG for March to September 2022. Retailers were given end-customer prices whose observance was monitored; both companies cooperated and did not contest the facts.
Non-binding recommended prices become prohibited resale price maintenance as soon as manufacturers monitor retail prices and object to deviations.
Resale price maintenance in online retail
- Authority / court
- Oberlandesgericht Wien als Kartellgericht (Antrag der Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Art. 101 Abs. 1 AEUV und § 1 Abs. 1 KartG; § 29 Z 1 lit. a und d KartG
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
- Culpability
- intentional
- Repeat case
- no
- Mitigating circumstances
- Full cooperation in clarifying the facts; all essential facts left undisputed (acknowledgement).
- Published
- 16 Dec 2025
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link