Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

1case from 1 jurisdiction
€659,106Total of monetary amounts
€659,106Largest single case: three Hong Kong mail inserter suppliers
€659,106Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Competition Tribunal (Hongkong), auf Antrag der Competition Commission €659,106 100 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Competition law €659,106 100 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. Anonymised companies €659,106 100 % · 1 case

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20231€659,106
20240–
20250–
20260–

1 case

14 Jun 2023 three Hong Kong mail inserter suppliersMail inserter cartel: Tribunal imposes 5,579,000 HKD on three suppliers Hong KongCartels and collusionanonymised €659,106

On 14 June 2023 the Competition Tribunal (Hong Kong's specialist competition court), on a joint application with the Competition Commission (Hong Kong's competition authority), imposed pecuniary penalties on three suppliers of mail inserters of the same brand that had fixed prices, shared markets and rigged bids between April 2018 and January 2019 (breach of the First Conduct Rule). The brand manufacturer's two Hong Kong companies (which formerly traded under the brand name) pay 1,399,000 HKD together, the second supplier 3,372,000 HKD and the third supplier 808,000 HKD, 5,579,000 HKD in total; in addition each pays 476,101 HKD in investigation costs plus legal costs. It was the first case in which all parties under investigation cooperated with the authority under its cooperation policy already at the investigation stage; in return the Commission refrained from pursuing the employees involved.

What organisations can take from it

Disclosing a cartel early and cooperating with the authority substantially reduces the penalty and can shield a company's own employees from personal enforcement action.

Relevance to training and awareness

Price fixing, market sharing and bid rigging in sales

Authority / court
Competition Tribunal (Hongkong), auf Antrag der Competition Commission
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Competition Ordinance (Cap. 619), s. 6 (First Conduct Rule), s. 93 (pecuniary penalty), s. 96 (Ermittlungskosten)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation discounts of 25% (brand manufacturer, second supplier) and 28% (third supplier); liability and penalties agreed by consent.
Published
15 Jun 2023

Original amount 5,579,000 HKD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 14 Jun 2023.

Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 14 Jun 2025 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial