Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific: 1,838 cases from 37 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by countryWhat for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by company- Groupe SEB, Darty, Boulanger u. a. (12 Unternehmen) €611m 27 % · 1 case
- AliExpress €550m 25 % · 2 cases
- Delivery Hero SE, Glovoapp23 SA €329m 15 % · 1 case
- Temu €200m 9 % · 1 case
- Infinite Styles Services Co. Limited (Shein) €150m 7 % · 1 case
- Anonymised companies €136.9m 6 % · 16 cases
- Gucci €119.7m 5 % · 1 case
- Morellato S.p.A. €25.9m 1 % · 1 case
- Jeronimo Martins Polska (Biedronka) €24.7m 1 % · 1 case
- Jura Poland sp. z o.o., Terg S.A., Euro-net sp. z o.o. u. a. (5 Unternehmen) €15.9m 1 % · 1 case
- 49 more€63.6m
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 2023 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2024 | 1 | €611m |
| Q1 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2026 | 0 | – |
1 case
19 Dec 2024 Groupe SEB, Darty, Boulanger u. a. (12 Unternehmen)Household appliances: EUR 611 million for resale price maintenance (SEB, Darty, Boulanger et al.) €611m
The Autorité de la concurrence (French Competition Authority) sanctioned ten manufacturers of large and small appliances and the retailers Darty and Boulanger because, in twelve vertical agreements running between February 2007 and December 2014, each of them had fixed retail prices with its trading partners. Fines: SEB 189.5 million, Darty 109 million, Boulanger 84.35 million, BSH 54 million, Electrolux 44.5 million, Whirlpool 44.5 million and, as successor to Indesit, 27.75 million, Candy Hoover 22.75 million, LG 15.5 million, Miele 14.25 million, Smeg 4.8 million and Eberhardt 0.1 million EUR. The authority dropped the allegation of a data exchange via the trade association GIFAM.
Recommended prices become prohibited resale price maintenance as soon as manufacturers and retailers jointly monitor and enforce compliance with them.
Resale price maintenance and recommended prices in distribution
- Authority / court
- Autorité de la concurrence
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Art. L. 420-1 Code de commerce; Art. 101 Abs. 1 AEUV
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Mitigating circumstances
- Ten companies used the settlement procedure and did not contest the objections; BSH received a reduction as leniency applicant. Only SEB and Boulanger contested the allegations.
- Published
- 19 Dec 2024
- Autorité de la concurrence, Décision 24-D-11 du 19 décembre 2024 (Entscheidungsseite) Decision of an authority
- Autorité de la concurrence, Décision 24-D-11 (Volltext, PDF) Decision of an authority
- Autorité de la concurrence, Communiqué de presse zu 24-D-11 Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link