Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

3cases from 1 jurisdiction
€1.53mTotal of monetary amounts
€482,498Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Επιτροπή Ανταγωνισμού (Hellenic Competition Commission) €1.44m 94 % · 2 cases
  2. Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic Data Protection Authority) €95,000 6 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Competition law €1.44m 94 % · 2 cases
  2. Data protection €95,000 6 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. VF Hellas Ενδυμάτων Ε.Π.Ε. (VF Hellas, Tochter der VF Corporation) €954,485 62 % · 1 case
  2. ΚΟΜΠΑ Μονοπρόσωπη Ε.Π.Ε. und HAPPY DOG Α.Ε. Ζωοτροφών €482,498 31 % · 1 case
  3. Μάρκετ Ιν ΑΕΒΕ (Market In) €95,000 6 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20261€482,498
Q2 20262€1.05m
Q3 20260—

3 cases

12 Jun 2026 Μάρκετ Ιν ΑΕΒΕ (Market In)Greece: 95,000 EUR against supermarket chain Market In over video footage GreeceVideo surveillance €95,000

A data subject complained about the disclosure of footage from the supermarket chain’s video surveillance and about the inadequate response to his access request. The Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic Data Protection Authority) found that Market In had passed the video footage to the judicial authorities without informing the data subject beforehand, processed more data than necessary, failed to comply with the right of access and failed to cooperate with the authority, and by Decision 10/2026 imposed a total of 95,000 EUR (50,000 EUR for lawfulness/transparency, 20,000 EUR each for data minimisation and the right of access, 5,000 EUR for failure to cooperate); in the same proceedings, ΜΕΔΕ ΑΕ received 65,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Release video footage only for a specific purpose – and anyone ignoring requests from the supervisory authority pays extra.

Relevance to training and awareness

Handling video footage and access requests

Authority / court
Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic Data Protection Authority)
Area of law
Data protection · Video surveillance
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, c, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 12, 13, 15, 31 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

3 Jun 2026 VF Hellas Ενδυμάτων Ε.Π.Ε. (VF Hellas, Tochter der VF Corporation)Greece: 954,485 EUR against VF Hellas for banning price comparison and Google Ads GreeceCartels and collusion €954,485

The importer and wholesaler of the Vans, Eastpak and The North Face brands contractually prohibited its retailers from using price comparison portals and search engine advertising (in particular Google Ads). The Επιτροπή Ανταγωνισμού (Hellenic Competition Commission) regarded this as a hardcore restriction in online sales and, in a settlement procedure (Decision 913/2026), set a reduced fine of 954,485 EUR; date = press release.

What organisations can take from it

Prohibiting retailers from using price comparison sites or search engine advertising is a hardcore restriction – distribution agreements should regularly undergo competition law review.

Relevance to training and awareness

Competition-law-compliant design of dealer agreements in online sales

Authority / court
Επιτροπή Ανταγωνισμού (Hellenic Competition Commission)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 1 Gesetz 3959/2011; Art. 101 AEUV; Art. 4 lit. e VO (EU) 2022/720
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement procedure (Diettheti Diaforon) with fine reduction
Published
3 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

6 Mar 2026 ΚΟΜΠΑ Μονοπρόσωπη Ε.Π.Ε. und HAPPY DOG Α.Ε. ΖωοτροφώνGreece: around 482,500 EUR against pet food importers for resale price maintenance GreeceCartels and collusion €482,498

Two importers of dog and cat food monitored their retailers’ consumer prices on price comparison portals and asked them to adjust them to their price lists; the retailers complied. In a settlement procedure (Decision 901/2026), the Επιτροπή Ανταγωνισμού (Hellenic Competition Commission) imposed 387,498 EUR on KOMPA and 95,000 EUR on Happy Dog; the case began with a tip-off via the authority’s anonymous whistleblowing platform.

What organisations can take from it

Recommended prices must not be enforced through monitoring and calls to retailers – and authorities’ whistleblowing channels make such practices visible.

Relevance to training and awareness

Prohibition of resale price maintenance in sales

Authority / court
Επιτροπή Ανταγωνισμού (Hellenic Competition Commission)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 1 Gesetz 3959/2011; Art. 101 AEUV
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement procedure with reduced fines
Published
6 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial