Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

7cases from 1 jurisdiction
€574,614Total of monetary amounts (1 case with an amount)
€574,614Largest single case: The Barcode Warehouse Ltd
€574,614Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Nottingham Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive) €574,614 100 % · 1 case
  2. Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS), Department for Business and Trade — 0 % · 4 cases
  3. Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) — 0 % · 2 cases

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Health and safety and employment law €574,614 100 % · 1 case
  2. Supply chain and human rights — 0 % · 4 cases
  3. Environment and sustainability — 0 % · 1 case
  4. Consumer protection and online retail — 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. The Barcode Warehouse Ltd €574,614 100 % · 1 case
  2. Amazon — 0 % · 1 case
  3. ASOS; Boohoo; George at Asda — 0 % · 1 case
  4. IKEA Supply AG — 0 % · 1 case
  5. Julian Bowen Limited — 0 % · 1 case
  6. Soho Home Limited — 0 % · 1 case
  7. William Yeoward Furniture Ltd — 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20231€574,614
Q1 20241—
Q2 20244—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20251—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20260—
Q3 20260—

7 cases

6 Jun 2025 AmazonAmazon commits to the CMA to tougher action against fake reviews United KingdomFake reviews Order

Following an investigation into fake reviews and "catalogue abuse" (transferring good reviews to other products), Amazon undertook to the CMA to detect and remove such reviews quickly, to sanction infringing sellers up to and including a ban on selling, and to set up simple reporting channels.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone who publishes reviews must maintain active processes against fakes and the transfer of reviews.

Authority / court
Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Fake reviews
Legal basis
Enterprise Act 2002, Part 8 (Verpflichtungszusagen nach altem Durchsetzungsregime)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Employees
10,000 or more
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary undertakings without a fine.
Published
6 Jun 2025
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

10 Jun 2024 Julian Bowen LimitedJulian Bowen Limited: notice of remedial action – timber imported without due diligence United KingdomSupply chain due diligence Order

As operator, the company placed furniture made of Vietnamese rubberwood from Malaysia on the market without exercising due diligence to reduce the risk of illegally harvested timber in the supply chain to a negligible level. The Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) issued a Notice of Remedial Action under Regulation 11 of the Timber Regulations 2013.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone placing timber or timber products on the market for the first time must check and document origin and legality – including for supplies from neighbouring countries.

Relevance to training and awareness

Due diligence in timber purchasing (origin, legality of harvest, risk mitigation)

Authority / court
Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS), Department for Business and Trade
Area of law
Supply chain and human rights · Supply chain due diligence
Legal basis
Timber and Timber Products (Placing on the Market) Regulations 2013, Regulation 4(b) (Sorgfaltspflicht nach Verordnung (EU) Nr. 995/2010 in der im UK fortgeltenden Fassung)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

4 Jun 2024 Soho Home LimitedSoho Home Limited: notice of remedial action – timber imported without due diligence United KingdomSupply chain due diligence Order

As operator, the company placed wooden furniture from Vietnam on the market without exercising due diligence to reduce the risk of illegally harvested timber in the supply chain to a negligible level. The Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) issued a Notice of Remedial Action under Regulation 11 of the Timber Regulations 2013.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone placing timber or timber products on the market for the first time must check and document origin and legality – including for supplies from neighbouring countries.

Relevance to training and awareness

Due diligence in timber purchasing (origin, legality of harvest, risk mitigation)

Authority / court
Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS), Department for Business and Trade
Area of law
Supply chain and human rights · Supply chain due diligence
Legal basis
Timber and Timber Products (Placing on the Market) Regulations 2013, Regulation 4(b) (Sorgfaltspflicht nach Verordnung (EU) Nr. 995/2010 in der im UK fortgeltenden Fassung)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

30 May 2024 IKEA Supply AGIKEA Supply AG: furniture seized – timber origin not sufficiently checked United KingdomSupply chain due diligence Other

In April 2024, the Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) seized furniture from the Vilto, Molger, Bekväm, Norbo and other ranges because IKEA Supply AG, as operator, could not demonstrate due diligence that sufficiently mitigated the risk of illegal timber. Following a second notice dated 30 May 2024, the company had to donate the goods to a named charity.

What organisations can take from it

Even large retailers with their own sustainability programmes must be able to prove due diligence for each product and consignment – otherwise the goods may be seized.

Relevance to training and awareness

Proof of timber origin in purchasing

Authority / court
Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS), Department for Business and Trade
Area of law
Supply chain and human rights · Supply chain due diligence
Legal basis
Timber and Timber Products (Placing on the Market) Regulations 2013, Regulation 4(a), Regulation 9 (Beschlagnahme)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Employees
10,000 or more
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

29 May 2024 William Yeoward Furniture LtdWilliam Yeoward Furniture Ltd: notice of remedial action – timber imported without due diligence United KingdomSupply chain due diligence Order

As operator, the company placed furniture from Vietnam on the market without exercising due diligence to reduce the risk of illegally harvested timber in the supply chain to a negligible level. The Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) issued a Notice of Remedial Action under Regulation 11 of the Timber Regulations 2013.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone placing timber or timber products on the market for the first time must check and document origin and legality – including for supplies from neighbouring countries.

Relevance to training and awareness

Due diligence in timber purchasing (origin, legality of harvest, risk mitigation)

Authority / court
Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS), Department for Business and Trade
Area of law
Supply chain and human rights · Supply chain due diligence
Legal basis
Timber and Timber Products (Placing on the Market) Regulations 2013, Regulation 4(b) (Sorgfaltspflicht nach Verordnung (EU) Nr. 995/2010 in der im UK fortgeltenden Fassung)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

27 Mar 2024 ASOS; Boohoo; George at AsdaCMA: ASOS, Boohoo and George at Asda commit to clear environmental claims United KingdomMisleading environmental and sustainability claims Other

Following an investigation into their fashion environmental claims, the three retailers gave formal undertakings to the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA): no vague terms such as ‘eco’ or ‘responsible’, clear information on recycled and organic content, transparent criteria for green ranges, correct filters and information on labels, and regular reports to the CMA. No breach of law was established.

What organisations can take from it

Sustainability labels in online shops must be specific, verifiable and easy for customers to understand; blanket terms are not sufficient.

Relevance to training and awareness

Wording of environmental claims in marketing and online shops

Authority / court
Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Misleading environmental and sustainability claims
Legal basis
Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (förmliche Verpflichtungszusagen)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Published
27 Mar 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

8 Nov 2023 The Barcode Warehouse LtdFatal forklift accident without seatbelt: Barcode Warehouse pays £500,000 United KingdomWorkplace safety and accidents €574,614

A 35-year-old forklift driver died at the Newark site when his counterbalance forklift truck overturned after striking a kerb; he was not wearing a seatbelt and was trapped under the overhead guard. The company had not enforced the requirement to wear seatbelts and had not adequately assessed its forklift operations. Fine of £500,000 plus costs.

What organisations can take from it

A seatbelt requirement only helps if supervisors check it and consistently address breaches.

Relevance to training and awareness

Seatbelt use and safe driving of forklift trucks

Authority / court
Nottingham Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Section 2(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Published
8 Nov 2023

Original amount 500,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 8 Nov 2023.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial