Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

1case from 1 jurisdiction
€1.4mTotal of monetary amounts
€1.4mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) €1.4m 100 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Bribery and corruption €1.4m 100 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. Anonymised companies €1.4m 100 % · 1 case

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20241€1.4m
20250–
20260–

1 case

18 Jun 2024 a Brazilian retailer, its holding company and two cultural project sponsorsRetailer and others: BRL 8.14m CGU fines over misused Rouanet cultural funding BrazilBribery and corruptionanonymised €1.4m

The CGU imposed fines totalling BRL 8,143,459.20 on a Brazilian retailer (BRL 4,386,459.20) and the group's jointly liable holding company (BRL 930,000.00) because, through an intermediary company, they had appropriated public funds stemming from tax relief (Art. 5 III Lei 12.846/2013), and on two project sponsors (BRL 1,297,000.00, Art. 5 II Lei 12.846/2013, and BRL 1,530,000.00 respectively); all four also breached the Lei Rouanet (Lei 8.313/1991, cultural incentive law), and three of them must additionally publish the decision by way of extraordinary publication. According to the final report, funded cultural projects (Pronacs) were diverted to produce books as marketing material for the retailer; a natural person was additionally fined BRL 500,000.00. On 30 September 2025 the CGU credited payments made by the retailer under a civil non-prosecution agreement (BRL 3,071,819.19 remaining) and rejected the requests of the holding company and the first project sponsor.

What organisations can take from it

Sponsorship backed by state tax incentives must not include benefits for the sponsor's own marketing – otherwise both sponsor and project sponsor face fines.

Relevance to training and awareness

Benefits in return for tax-incentivised cultural sponsorship

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption
Legal basis
Lei 12.846/2013, Art. 5 II und III, Art. 6 I und II; Lei 8.313/1991 (Lei Rouanet), Art. 2 §§ 1 und 2, Art. 23 § 1, Art. 38; Decreto 11.129/2022
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Mitigating circumstances
Payments made by the retailer under a civil non-prosecution agreement (ANPC) on the same facts were credited against its fine.
Published
21 Jun 2024

Original amount 8,143,459.2 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 Jun 2024.

Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 18 Jun 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial