Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

5cases from 1 jurisdiction
€2.18bnTotal of monetary amounts (4 cases with an amount)
€2.13bnLargest single case: Amazon.com, Inc.
€25.9mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) €2.18bn 100 % · 2 cases
  2. U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) €231,790 0 % · 1 case
  3. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission €127,641 0 % · 1 case
  4. Federal Trade Commission — 0 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Consumer protection and online retail €2.18bn 100 % · 2 cases
  2. Health and safety and employment law €231,790 0 % · 1 case
  3. Whistleblower protection €127,641 0 % · 1 case
  4. AI and digital regulation — 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. Amazon.com, Inc. €2.13bn 98 % · 1 case
  2. Maplebear Inc. (Instacart) €51.5m 2 % · 1 case
  3. FleetPride Inc. €231,790 0 % · 1 case
  4. Foot Locker, Inc. €127,641 0 % · 1 case
  5. Rite Aid Corporation — 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20231—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20251€2.13bn
Q4 20250—
Q1 20261€51.5m
Q2 20261€127,641
Q3 20261€231,790

5 cases

15 Jul 2026 FleetPride Inc.FleetPride: $264,380 after asphyxiation death during tank trailer inspection USAWorkplace safety and accidents €231,790

At the truck parts distributor's Corpus Christi (Texas) site, an employee was asphyxiated while inspecting a tank trailer. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) found no confined space programme, deficiencies in the respiratory protection programme and electrical hazards, and proposed $264,380 (16 serious, 3 other violations).

What organisations can take from it

Tanks and vessels are confined spaces with a risk of asphyxiation – no one may enter without a permit, atmospheric testing and an attendant.

Relevance to training and awareness

Working in confined spaces and vessels

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
29 CFR 1910.146 (Permit-required confined spaces); 29 CFR 1910.134 (Respiratory protection)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Published
15 Jul 2026

Original amount 264,380 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

22 May 2026 Foot Locker, Inc.SEC: Foot Locker pays 148,000 US dollars over award waivers in separation agreements USARetaliation against whistleblowers €127,641

From July 2020 to June 2024, around 148 departing employees – including managers and staff from finance, legal and supply chain – signed separation agreements containing a waiver of SEC whistleblower awards. Foot Locker had itself phased out the clause from March 2024 but had not amended all templates; the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) imposed 148,000 US dollars.

What organisations can take from it

When cleaning up clauses, all contract templates must be covered – a single forgotten template is enough for a violation.

Relevance to training and awareness

Whistleblower protection in contract templates (HR/Legal)

Authority / court
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Area of law
Whistleblower protection · Retaliation against whistleblowers
Legal basis
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rule 21F-17(a)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Employees
10,000 or more
Mitigating circumstances
Clause phased out before contact by the SEC; cooperation and prompt remediation
Published
22 May 2026

Original amount 148,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 May 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

13 Jan 2026 Maplebear Inc. (Instacart)Instacart pays 60 million USD in FTC settlement over "free delivery" with mandatory fees USAMisleading advertising and pricing €51.5m

According to the FTC, Instacart advertised free delivery but charged mandatory service fees of up to 15 %, promised a "100 % satisfaction guarantee" without providing full refunds and did not sufficiently point out the subsequent charges for trial subscriptions. Under the settlement, the company is paying 60 million USD for refunds and must discontinue the practices complained of.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone advertising something as "free" must not add a mandatory fee elsewhere.

Relevance to training and awareness

Price advertising and disclosure of fees in marketing

Authority / court
Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Section 5 FTC Act; Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act (ROSCA)
Action
Disgorgement of profits
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Published
18 Dec 2025

Original amount 60,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 13 Jan 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

25 Sep 2025 Amazon.com, Inc.Amazon pays 2.5 billion USD in FTC settlement over Prime sign-up and cancellation hurdles USAInformation duties in online retail €2.13bn

According to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Amazon used confusing order screens to push millions of customers into Prime subscriptions without their consent and deliberately made cancellation difficult. The settlement comprises a civil penalty of 1 billion USD and 1.5 billion USD in refunds, as well as a clear decline button and simple cancellation.

What organisations can take from it

Subscription sign-ups require an equally prominent option to decline and a cancellation process that is as simple as signing up.

Relevance to training and awareness

Dark patterns and subscription design in product design

Authority / court
Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Information duties in online retail
Legal basis
Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act (ROSCA); Section 5 FTC Act
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Employees
10,000 or more
Liability of senior managers
The press release names Senior Vice President Neil Lindsay and Vice President Jamil Ghani.
Published
25 Sep 2025

Original amount 2,500,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 25 Sep 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

19 Dec 2023 Rite Aid CorporationFTC: five-year ban on AI facial recognition for Rite Aid after false alerts USAAI systems Order

According to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the pharmacy chain used AI facial recognition in hundreds of stores from 2012 to 2020, which falsely flagged customers – particularly women and people of colour – as shoplifters; accuracy was neither tested in advance nor monitored, and employees were not adequately trained. Under the proposed settlement order (subject to approval by the bankruptcy court and the federal court), Rite Aid may not use the technology for surveillance for five years and must delete images and algorithms developed from them; in addition, the FTC alleges a violation of its 2010 data security order.

What organisations can take from it

AI systems with consequences for people need testing for error rates, ongoing monitoring and trained staff who critically review matches.

Relevance to training and awareness

Training on handling AI matches and false alerts

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Federal Trade Commission
Area of law
AI and digital regulation · AI systems
Legal basis
FTC Act Section 5; Verstoß gegen FTC-Datensicherheitsanordnung von 2010
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Employees
10,000 or more
Repeat case
yes
Published
19 Dec 2023

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial