Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 1,370 cases from 35 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by countryWhat for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by company- Anonymised companies €163.7m 32 % · 32 cases
- J.P. Morgan SE €57.2m 11 % · 2 cases
- Klarna Bank AB €43.4m 8 % · 1 case
- Saxo Bank A/S €41.9m 8 % · 1 case
- Coinbase Europe Limited €21.5m 4 % · 1 case
- Svea Bank AB €15.5m 3 % · 1 case
- Ikano Bank AB €12.9m 2 % · 1 case
- Pluxee Česká republika a.s.; Edenred CZ s.r.o.; Up Česká republika s.r.o. €11.5m 2 % · 1 case
- Revolut Group Holdings Ltd, Revolut Bank UAB, Revolut Securities Europe UAB €11.5m 2 % · 1 case
- Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski S.A. (PKO BP) €11m 2 % · 1 case
- 107 more€124.2m
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2026 | 1 | €1.32m |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | — |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | — |
1 case
19 Mar 2026 Mavera ABMavera: SEK 14.3m for exclusivity clauses with insurance medical advisers €1.32m
The Konkurrensverket (Swedish Competition Authority) found that Mavera AB abuses its dominant position by applying, since 1 January 2021, exclusivity clauses in contracts with companies providing insurance medical advice that prohibit advising competing businesses. The authority imposed a competition damages fee (konkurrensskadeavgift) of 14,300,000 SEK and ordered the company to stop applying the clauses and to inform its contractual partners within six weeks; the order is backed by a conditional fine (vite) of 30,000,000 SEK. Mavera has appealed to the Patent- och marknadsdomstolen (Patent and Market Court). The decision is not final.
Exclusivity ties imposed by a dominant customer on service providers can keep competitors out of the market and carry high competition law risk.
Exclusivity clauses used by dominant companies
- Authority / court
- Konkurrensverket
- Area of law
- Competition law · Abuse of market power
- Legal basis
- 2 kap. 7 § konkurrenslagen (2008:579); Art. 102 AEUV; 3 kap. 1 § och 3 kap. 5 § första stycket 1 KL
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Published
- 19 Mar 2026
Original amount 14,300,000 SEK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Mar 2026.
- Konkurrensverket, Ärenden och beslut: Mavera AB, dnr 91/2023 Enforcement database of an authority
- Konkurrensverket, Beschluss vom 19.03.2026, Dnr 91/2023 – Mavera AB Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link