Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,033 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by regionAll jurisdictions
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by company- Anonymised companies 100 cases 20 % · €1.33bn
- Peken Global Limited (KuCoin) 3 cases 1 % · €12.7m
- „Paysera LT“, UAB 2 cases 0 % · €762,000
- Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft 2 cases 0 % · €3.83m
- J.P. Morgan SE 2 cases 0 % · €57.2m
- S-Pankki Oyj 2 cases 0 % · €9.47m
- UBS Financial Services Inc. 2 cases 0 % · €115.3m
- „ЗП Либра“ ООД 1 case 0 % · €22,602
- 13010431 Canada Inc. (Necosmart) 1 case 0 % · €434,295
- 2147353 Ontario Inc. 1 case 0 % · €22,376
- 375 more375 cases
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 2023 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2024 | 1 | €1.7m |
| Q1 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2026 | 0 | – |
1 case
2 Dec 2024 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.MAS: SGD 2.4m civil penalty on JPMorgan over excessive bond spreads €1.7m
Relationship managers at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. misrepresented or incompletely disclosed price components in 24 over-the-counter bond transactions between November 2018 and September 2019, so that clients paid spreads above those agreed (in breach of s 201(c) and (d) SFA, the Securities and Futures Act). The bank admitted liability under s 236C SFA because, lacking adequate processes and controls, it had neither prevented nor detected the misconduct; it allegedly paid the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS, Singapore's central bank and financial regulator) a civil penalty of SGD 2.4 million and refunded the overcharged fees to clients. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.
A firm that gives relationship managers discretion over pricing must systematically check compliance with agreed terms – otherwise the institution is liable for their misconduct.
Accurate and complete disclosure of prices and spreads to clients
- Authority / court
- Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)
- Area of law
- Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
- Legal basis
- ss 201(c), 201(d), 232 und 236C Securities and Futures Act (SFA)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Culpability
- negligent
- Published
- 2 Dec 2024
Original amount 2,400,000 SGD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Dec 2024.
- MAS: MAS Imposes Civil Penalty of $2.4 Million on JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. for Misconduct by its Relationship Managers (02.12.2024) Press release of an authority
- MAS: Enforcement Actions (Verzeichnis, Eintrag 02.12.2024, Action Type Civil Penalty) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link