Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,033 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by regionAll jurisdictions
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by company- Eni S.p.A., Kuwait Petroleum Italia S.p.A. (Q8), Italiana Petroli S.p.A. (IP) u. a. (6 Unternehmen) €936.7m 44 % · 1 case
- Anonymised companies €327.8m 15 % · 22 cases
- Adani Enterprises Limited €236.1m 11 % · 1 case
- Trafigura Beheer B.V. €213.2m 10 % · 2 cases
- TotalEnergies Marketing France, Rubis Énergie, Rubis Terminal, EG Retail €187.5m 9 % · 1 case
- HF Sinclair Navajo Refining LLC €34m 2 % · 1 case
- National Grid Electricity Transmission plc €23.2m 1 % · 1 case
- Repsol Soluciones Energéticas (vormals Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos), Solred, Campsa Estaciones de Servicio u. a. (5 Gesellschaften) €20.5m 1 % · 1 case
- Freepoint Commodities LLC €17.8m 1 % · 1 case
- Paprec Group €17.5m 1 % · 1 case
- 70 more€124.6m
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 2023 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2025 | 1 | €8,438 |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2026 | 0 | – |
1 case
7 Jan 2025 City of Boardman (Oregon)City of Boardman: 8,770 USD – water system's risk assessment was an empty template €8,438
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, Region 10) imposed a civil penalty of 8,770 USD by consent agreement and final order on the City of Boardman (Oregon), whose drinking water system serves around 4,490 people. According to the EPA, the city had not prepared the risk and resilience assessment and emergency response plan required by the Safe Drinking Water Act on time and had not complied with a 2022 EPA order: at an inspection in April 2024 the assessment was an empty template, and the emergency response plan dated from 2005 and contained no cybersecurity section. The city admitted jurisdiction without admitting or denying the factual allegations and waived its right to appeal. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment.
Mandatory assessments of physical and cyber security must be substantively prepared and kept up to date – a template that has merely been certified does not meet the obligation.
Actually prepare the risk and resilience assessment, including cybersecurity, and keep the emergency response plan current
- Authority / court
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 10
- Area of law
- Information security and cyber · Critical infrastructure
- Legal basis
- Safe Drinking Water Act Section 1433(a) und (b) (42 U.S.C. § 300i-2) sowie Section 1414(g)(3)(A); Strafe nach Section 1414(g)(3)(B) (42 U.S.C. § 300g-3(g)(3)(B))
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Repeat case
- yes
- Published
- 7 Jan 2025
Original amount 8,770 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 Jan 2025.
- EPA Region 10 – Consent Agreement, In the Matter of City of Boardman, Docket No. SDWA-10-2025-0022 (eingereicht 07.01.2025) Decision of an authority
- EPA Region 10 – Final Order, City of Boardman, Docket No. SDWA-10-2025-0022 (07.01.2025) Decision of an authority
- EPA Administrative Enforcement Dockets – SDWA-10-2025-0022 (Status Closed, Payment Received) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link