Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by regionAll jurisdictions
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
- Competition law €1.44bn 48 % · 30 cases
- Bribery and corruption €864.9m 29 % · 7 cases
- Sanctions and export control €236.8m 8 % · 2 cases
- Data protection €121.5m 4 % · 30 cases
- Capital markets and financial supervision €110m 4 % · 7 cases
- Environment and sustainability €89.9m 3 % · 22 cases
- Consumer protection and online retail €57m 2 % · 20 cases
- Other €38.7m 1 % · 7 cases
- Whistleblower protection €4.18m 0 % · 3 cases
- Health and safety and employment law €2.71m 0 % · 7 cases
- 2 more€8,438
Who?
by company- Anonymised companies €1.15bn 39 % · 55 cases
- Eni S.p.A., Kuwait Petroleum Italia S.p.A. (Q8), Italiana Petroli S.p.A. (IP) u. a. (6 Unternehmen) €936.7m 32 % · 1 case
- Adani Enterprises Limited €236.1m 8 % · 1 case
- Trafigura Beheer B.V. €213.2m 7 % · 2 cases
- TotalEnergies Marketing France, Rubis Énergie, Rubis Terminal, EG Retail €187.5m 6 % · 1 case
- HF Sinclair Navajo Refining LLC €34m 1 % · 1 case
- National Grid Electricity Transmission plc €23.2m 1 % · 1 case
- Repsol Soluciones Energéticas (vormals Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos), Solred, Campsa Estaciones de Servicio u. a. (5 Gesellschaften) €20.5m 1 % · 1 case
- Freepoint Commodities LLC €17.8m 1 % · 1 case
- Paprec Group €17.5m 1 % · 1 case
- 69 more€124.6m
When?
per year, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 11 | €361m |
| 2023 | 22 | €409.7m |
| 2024 | 31 | €432.1m |
| 2025 | 42 | €1.43bn |
| 2026 | 33 | €330.8m |
139 cases
24 Sep 2026 Kalibrate Canada (Tochter der Kalibrate Technologies Ltd.)Canada: Kalibrate must stop sharing retailer-specific petrol station data Order
Kalibrate's "Market Intelligence" product passed on retailer-specific sales data from petrol stations that allowed conclusions to be drawn about competitors and could facilitate coordinated pricing behaviour. In an agreement registered with the Competition Tribunal, Kalibrate undertakes to supply only aggregated and time-delayed data – the first case under the reformed abuse of dominance rules.
Providers of market and price data must ensure that their products do not disseminate individualised competitor data.
- Authority / court
- Competition Bureau Canada (Consent Agreement beim Competition Tribunal)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Abuse of market power
- Legal basis
- Abuse-of-dominance-Bestimmungen des Competition Act (Fassung 2023)
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Published
- 24 Sep 2026
- Competition Bureau secures agreement with Kalibrate to protect competition in the retail gas industry Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
22 Sep 2026 Southern WaterSouthern Water: 2.4 million GBP fine for sewage and diesel pollution in Kent €2.9m
Between 2019 and 2021, untreated sewage, sewage residues, diesel from a generator and waste entered a stream and the sea around Faversham and Whitstable; the circumstances of one incident were not reported to the Environment Agency, around 70 fish died, and bathing warnings were in place at beaches in Tankerton and Herne Bay for almost a week. The court imposed a fine of 2,416,666.67 GBP, 69,894.04 GBP in costs and a 190 GBP victim surcharge; it was the company's second conviction that year (announcement of 22 September 2026, exact date of judgment not stated). According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2026, the company had around 3,109 employees.
Repeated pollution and failure to report incidents lead to a series of prosecutions with rising fines.
Reporting environmental incidents to the regulator
- Authority / court
- Bromley Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Environment Agency)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Regulations 12(1)(b) und 38(1)(a) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Employees
- 1,000 to 9,999
- Repeat case
- yes
- Published
- 22 Sep 2026
Original amount 2,486,750.71 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 Sep 2026.
- Southern Water fined £2.4m for Kent pollution Press release of an authority
- Companies House: Registereintrag Southern Water Services Limited (02366670) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link
Report an error
22 Sep 2026 Audax Renovables, S.A. – Sucursal em PortugalPortugal: 22,000 EUR against Audax Renovables over missing gas reserves and hotline €22,000
On a total of 249 days, the Portuguese branch of the energy supplier failed to hold the mandatory natural gas security reserves, did not correctly show network charges on invoices, did not publish, or published late, mandatory information and its quality report, and failed to meet the standards for hotline waiting times. In a settlement procedure, the Entidade Reguladora dos Serviços Energéticos (Portuguese Energy Services Regulatory Authority, ERSE) set a fine of 44,000 EUR and reduced it to 22,000 EUR.
Security of supply and service obligations in the energy sector are sanctioned individually – a compliance calendar for reserves and reports helps.
- Authority / court
- Entidade Reguladora dos Serviços Energéticos (ERSE)
- Area of law
- Other
- Legal basis
- Regime Sancionatório do Setor Energético (RSSE), Art. 28, 29; Decreto-Lei n.º 62/2020, Art. 96; RRC; RQS
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- Settlement (transação) with full admission, remediation of all infringements
- ERSE – Decisões sancionatórias: Processos n.º 47/2024 e 62/2025 – Audax Renovables, S.A. – Sucursal em Portugal Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
17 Sep 2026 China Power International Development Limited, Towngas - China Power (HK) Integrated Energy Company Limited, A. Kourage Limited u. a. (4 Unternehmen)Fatal electric shock at Science Park: four companies pay 3,137,250 HKD €348,309
On 17 September 2026 the Shatin Magistrates' Courts (a Hong Kong magistrates' court), on prosecutions brought by the Labour Department (Hong Kong's labour authority), fined four companies for breaches of the Factories and Industrial Undertakings Regulations, the Factories and Industrial Undertakings (Electricity) Regulations and the Construction Sites (Safety) Regulations (Hong Kong workplace safety rules). The case concerned a fatal accident on 10 September 2023 at Hong Kong Science Park, in which a worker received an electric shock while carrying out electrical work. China Power International Development Limited and Towngas - China Power (HK) Integrated Energy Company Limited pay 908,000 HKD each, A. Kourage Limited 904,250 HKD and Skynet Engineering Company Limited 417,000 HKD, 3,137,250 HKD in total.
In electrical work several companies involved can be criminally liable at the same time – workplace safety must be coordinated among all parties.
Electrical safety in installation and construction work
- Authority / court
- Shatin Magistrates' Courts, Hongkong (Anklage: Labour Department)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
- Legal basis
- Factories and Industrial Undertakings Regulations; Factories and Industrial Undertakings (Electricity) Regulations; Construction Sites (Safety) Regulations
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Published
- 17 Sep 2026
Original amount 3,137,250 HKD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Sep 2026.
- HKSAR Government (Labour Department): Contractors fined for violation of safety legislation (17.09.2026) Press release of an authority
- Labour Department: Press Releases (Liste) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
16 Sep 2026 ENECHANGE株式会社ENECHANGE: 91.495 million JPY over overstated revenue in quarterly report and prospectus €511,488
Because revenue had been overstated at the company and its consolidated subsidiary or subsidiaries, the quarterly report for the third quarter of 2023 (filed on 10 November 2023) showed a consolidated loss of 1,382,861 thousand JPY instead of 1,662,516 thousand JPY; the registration statement for a share issue relied on this report, and on 26 February 2024 3,784,200 shares were issued for 3,999,899,400 JPY. After the company admitted the facts and the amount, an administrative monetary penalty (kachōkin) of 91,495,000 JPY was imposed: 1,500,000 JPY for the quarterly report and 89,995,000 JPY for the registration statement.
Revenue recognition at subsidiaries should be scrutinised before any capital increase; an error in a quarterly report becomes many times more expensive through the prospectus.
Correct revenue recognition before capital market transactions
- Authority / court
- Financial Services Agency (FSA, 金融庁) auf Empfehlung der Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC, 証券取引等監視委員会)
- Area of law
- Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
- Legal basis
- Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA, 金融商品取引法) Art. 172-4 Abs. 2 a. F., Art. 172-2 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, Art. 185-7 Abs. 1 und 14
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Mitigating circumstances
- Both partial amounts were halved because the company had filed a report for a reduction before the inspection began (Art. 185-7(14) FIEA).
- Published
- 17 Sep 2026
Original amount 91,495,000 JPY, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Sep 2026.
- 金融庁 – 決定要旨 令和8年度(判)第4号 ENECHANGE株式会社 (Entscheidung vom 16.09.2026) Decision of an authority
- 金融庁 – ENECHANGE(株)における四半期報告書等の虚偽記載に対する課徴金納付命令の決定について(令和8年9月17日) Press release of an authority
- SESC – ENECHANGE株式会社における四半期報告書等の虚偽記載に係る課徴金納付命令勧告について(令和8年6月12日) Press release of an authority
- 金融庁 – 令和8年度課徴金納付命令等一覧 Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
8 Sep 2026 United Utilities Water LimitedUnited Utilities: record fine of 900,000 GBP after sewage flood on the Fylde coast €1.12m
Following a partial pipe collapse at the Fleetwood wastewater treatment works, untreated sewage flowed from three pumping stations into the Irish Sea for over 35 hours in June 2023; seven bathing waters were affected and shellfish beds were closed. The water company pleaded guilty to five offences and must pay a fine of 900,000 GBP, 62,225 GBP in costs and a 2,000 GBP victim surcharge. According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2026, the company had around 6,678 full-time equivalent employees.
The condition and redundancy of critical wastewater infrastructure are a permit obligation; the Environment Agency assessed the failure as reckless and in the highest harm category.
- Authority / court
- Preston Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Environment Agency)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Regulation 38(2) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Employees
- 1,000 to 9,999
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- Around 38 million GBP invested in response and repair, and a voluntary payment of 250,000 GBP to Blackpool Council.
- Published
- 8 Sep 2026
Original amount 964,225 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 8 Sep 2026.
- Water company fined record £900k after coastline sewage spill Press release of an authority
- Companies House: Registereintrag United Utilities Water Limited (02366678) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link
Report an error
6 Aug 2026 Capwatt Retail Gás PT, S.A.Portugal: 12,000 EUR against Capwatt over gas reserves and dispute resolution notice €12,000
In several months of 2023 and 2024, the gas supplier did not hold the natural gas security reserves and did not name the competent alternative dispute resolution bodies in customer contracts. The Entidade Reguladora dos Serviços Energéticos (Portuguese Energy Services Regulatory Authority, ERSE) accepted the settlement proposal, set a fine of 24,000 EUR and reduced it to 12,000 EUR.
Mandatory information in consumer contracts – for example on dispute resolution – belongs in a regularly reviewed contract template.
- Authority / court
- Entidade Reguladora dos Serviços Energéticos (ERSE)
- Area of law
- Other
- Legal basis
- RSSE, Art. 29; Decreto-Lei n.º 62/2020, Art. 57, 96; Portaria n.º 59/2022; RRC Art. 22
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- Settlement with admission and remediation
- ERSE – Decisões sancionatórias: Processo n.º 50/2024 – Capwatt Retail Gás PT, S.A. Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
20 Jul 2026 Enforcesco, S.A.Portugal: €107,920 for Enforcesco over switches without consent and gas reserves €107,920
In a settlement procedure the energy regulator ordered electricity and gas supplier Enforcesco to pay 107,920 EUR in total: 90,000 EUR (halved from 180,000 EUR) under the energy-sector sanctions regime and 17,920 EUR in voluntarily paid fines for economic administrative offences. The breaches included taking over 6,853 customers without explicit consent, failing to hold the required natural gas security reserves from January 2023 to February 2025, incorrect invoices, an unlawful disconnection and a call-centre answer rate of only 57.8% in 2023.
Mass customer acquisitions without documented consent and neglected mandatory reserves reveal a lack of compliance oversight during growth.
Consent for supplier switching and the duty to hold security-of-supply reserves
- Authority / court
- Entidade Reguladora dos Serviços Energéticos (ERSE)
- Area of law
- Consumer protection and online retail
- Legal basis
- Lei n.º 9/2013 (RSSE), Art. 28 und 29, i. V. m. RRC 2020 und geltendem RRC, RQS, Diretivas ERSE n.º 1/2018 und 22/2022, Portaria n.º 59/2022; RJCE
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- Full admission, cooperation, remedying of all breaches, the company's financial situation and compensation of three customers (150 EUR in total) were taken into account in the settlement procedure.
- ERSE, Decisões sancionatórias 2026: Processo 23/2025 – Enforcesco, S.A. Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
17 Jul 2026 Southern WaterSouthern Water: £7.1m fine for repeated sewage discharges in Kent €8.38m
Canterbury Crown Court fined Southern Water £7,127,083 for 13 breaches of the Environmental Permitting Regulations 2016, plus £149,000 in prosecution costs and a £181 victim surcharge. Between 2019 and 2021, failed pumps and poorly maintained equipment at the Margate and Broadstairs pumping stations led to several discharges of untreated sewage into the sea, some of which were reported only the next day or weeks later; beaches had to be closed. The company also admitted 35 further unlawful discharges from the same period.
Maintaining critical pumping equipment and reporting every discharge to the regulator immediately are core duties of any permit holder.
Plant maintenance and prompt reporting of environmental incidents
- Authority / court
- Canterbury Crown Court (Anklage: Environment Agency)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Reg. 12(1)(b) und 38(1)(a) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Repeat case
- yes
- Published
- 17 Jul 2026
Original amount 7,127,083 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Jul 2026.
- Environment Agency: Southern Water fined £7.1 million for sewage pollution (17.07.2026) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
29 Jun 2026 Petrofac Facilities Management LimitedPetrofac Facilities Management: £569,157 settlement over Russia sanctions breaches €660,160
The company paid HMRC a compound settlement of £569,157.07 for alleged breaches of the Russia sanctions. According to HMRC, while withdrawing from Russia in 2022/2023 it allegedly made sanctioned industrial goods available on two occasions to a person connected with Russia or for use in Russia, and provided related technical assistance. According to HMRC, this is the first time it has publicly named the company behind such a settlement.
Even when withdrawing from a sanctioned market, the prohibitions on making goods available and on technical assistance apply in full.
Sanctions screening of goods supplied and technical assistance when exiting a market
- Authority / court
- HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
- Legal basis
- Reg. 46Y(2)(c) und Reg. 46Z(1)(b) Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Mitigating circumstances
- Voluntary disclosure and full cooperation with HMRC.
- Published
- 29 Jun 2026
Original amount 569,157.07 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 29 Jun 2026.
- HMRC/DBT/ECJU: Notice to exporters 2026/15: firm named after Russia sanctions breach settlement (29.06.2026) Official register or notice
- GOV.UK: Sanctions enforcement action – HMRC enforcement notices (Juni 2026) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
25 Jun 2026 TotalEnergiesParis Judicial Court: TotalEnergies must include Scope 3 emissions in vigilance plan Order
In an action brought by Notre Affaire à Tous, Sherpa, ZEA, France Nature Environnement and the City of Paris, the Paris Judicial Court (Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, 34th chamber) ruled that climate risks fall under the French duty of vigilance law and that Scope 3 emissions are part of the oil and gas group's activities. The vigilance plan without Scope 3 is incomplete, the court held; TotalEnergies must supplement it within six months, with provisional enforceability, and implementation will be reviewed by the court in January 2027.
Risk analyses under due diligence laws must also cover the climate impact of the products sold (Scope 3).
- Authority / court
- Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (34. Kammer)
- Area of law
- Supply chain and human rights · Supply chain due diligence
- Legal basis
- Art. L.225-102-1 und L.225-102-2 Code de commerce (Loi n° 2017-399, devoir de vigilance); Art. 1252 Code civil
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 25 Jun 2026
- Communiqué de presse – Jugement du 25 juin 2026, 34ème chambre Court press release
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
12 Jun 2026 Esso Petroleum Company LimitedEsso: £1m fine after LPG release at Fawley refinery €1.16m
Esso was fined £1m and ordered to pay £12,277 in costs. On 8 November 2022, a corroded steel tower at the Fawley refinery partially collapsed, damaged pipework and released around 2,400 kg of liquefied petroleum gas over 33 hours; workers were exposed to the risk of falling debris and potential burns. According to the Health and Safety Executive's investigation, the corrosion had been known since 2010 without appropriate action being taken.
Known corrosion findings on load-bearing structures must be assessed and remedied promptly, before they lead to a major incident.
Asset integrity and handling known corrosion findings
- Authority / court
- Southampton Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
- Legal basis
- Section 3(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Mitigating circumstances
- Guilty plea; no injuries.
- Published
- 15 Jun 2026
Original amount 1,000,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Jun 2026.
- HSE: Esso fined £1 million after major gas leak at Fawley refinery (15.06.2026) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
5 Jun 2026 Εταιρεία Προμήθειας Αερίου Θεσσαλονίκης Θεσσαλίας Α.Ε. („ZeniΘ“) und Τράπεζα Πειραιώς Α.Ε. (Piraeus Bank)Greece: 110,000 EUR against energy supplier ZENITH and Piraeus Bank (right of access) €110,000
Due to errors by a processor of the energy supplier, incorrect details of a direct debit mandate were recorded, so that three bills instead of one were debited from the customer's account; call recordings and the mandate form had not been retained. ZENITH responded inadequately to the access request and did not correct the data (100,000 EUR), while Piraeus Bank infringed the right of access (10,000 EUR and a reprimand); Decision No. 8/2026 of the Hellenic Data Protection Authority.
Answer access requests in full and retain records of mandates – this also applies to data recorded by a service provider.
- Authority / court
- Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic DPA)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. d, Art. 12 Abs. 3, Art. 15, Art. 28 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Επιβολή προστίμου σε πάροχο ηλεκτρικής ενέργειας και σε τράπεζα για παραβάσεις του ΓΚΠΔ (Απόφαση 8/2026) Decision of an authority
- Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων – Απόφαση 8/2026 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
3 Jun 2026 OVO Energy LimitedOfgem: OVO pays GBP 10.4m over poor support for vulnerable prepayment customers €12m
Ofgem found that OVO Energy did not adequately monitor prepayment customers in vulnerable situations, did not properly support customers who self-disconnected and did not maintain the Priority Services Register properly; some internal training materials were unclear and contradictory. By way of alternative action, OVO is paying GBP 7m into the voluntary redress fund and providing GBP 3.4m in credit and debt relief to its most vulnerable customers; under a separate compliance engagement it is also paying GBP 1.1m to customers in the Scottish Highlands and Islands.
Policies on paper are not enough: training materials and processes for vulnerable customers must be consistent and checked in practice.
Dealing with customers in vulnerable situations
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem)
- Area of law
- Consumer protection and online retail
- Legal basis
- Standard Licence Conditions 26.1, 26.4, 26.5(d)(f), 27A.1, 28.1A/28.1B, 28.2 und 28.4 der Gas- und Stromversorgungslizenzen
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Mitigating circumstances
- Remedial action during the investigation, including welfare visits to customers who had been disconnected for more than 72 hours.
- Published
- 3 Jun 2026
Original amount 10,400,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Jun 2026.
- Ofgem: Decision to close investigation into OVO Energy Limited prepayment meter practices (3 June 2026) Decision of an authority
- Ofgem press release: OVO agrees settlement in relation to Ofgem's investigation of its monitoring of prepayment meter customers (3 June 2026) Press release of an authority
- Ofgem enforcement case: OVO Energy: prepayment meter practices Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
27 May 2026 Soltec Power Holdings, SASoltec: incorrect 2023 annual figures reported to the market €190,000
The manufacturer of solar tracking systems disseminated its results for 2023 by way of an "Otra Información Relevante" announcement containing inaccurate information. Spain's National Securities Market Commission (CNMV) imposed a fine of 190,000 EUR for a serious infringement; the company waived administrative appeals.
Voluntary market announcements on results are also subject to MAR – figures must be reconciled before publication.
- Authority / court
- Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV)
- Area of law
- Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
- Legal basis
- Art. 297.1.e i. V. m. 297.2.d Ley 6/2023; Art. 17 i. V. m. Art. 7 MAR
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Published
- 3 Aug 2026
- Resolución de 17 de julio de 2026 (BOE-A-2026-16923) – sanción a Soltec Power Holdings, SA Official register or notice
- CNMV – Registro público de sanciones Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
18 May 2026 Adani Enterprises LimitedAdani Enterprises pays 275 million USD over Iranian liquefied petroleum gas €236.1m
From November 2023 to June 2025, the Indian conglomerate bought allegedly Omani and Iraqi liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) via a trader in Dubai which in fact originated from Iran; 32 payments totalling around 192 million USD were routed through US banks. The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) assessed the violations as egregious and not voluntarily self-disclosed; Adani had recklessly ignored numerous warning signs (AIS manipulation by the tankers, implausible loading ports, conspicuous price discounts, irregularities in the certificates of origin).
Companies that source commodities below market price via intermediaries must actively check origin, vessel movements and documents – mere name screening against sanctions lists is not enough.
Warning signs in commodity and shipping transactions (origin, AIS gaps, price discounts)
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
- Legal basis
- Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (31 C.F.R. part 560); IEEPA
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Mitigating circumstances
- Remedial measures after discovery and cooperation with OFAC
- Published
- 18 May 2026
Original amount 275,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 May 2026.
- OFAC Enforcement Release: Adani Enterprises Limited Settles with OFAC for $275,000,000 (18.05.2026) Decision of an authority
- OFAC – Civil Penalties and Enforcement Information Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
13 May 2026 Comércio de Combustíveis Stang Ltda., Pato Comércio de Combustíveis Ltda. u. a. (3 Unternehmen)CADE: fuel cartel in Coronel Vivida – fines cut to BRL 15.1m on embargos €2.63m
The CADE Tribunal convicted three petrol station companies because in 2017 they had divided the lots of municipal fuel tenders in Coronel Vivida (Paraná) among themselves in advance and had also coordinated retail pump prices. The fines on the companies initially totalled 43,953,905.42 BRL (Comércio de Combustíveis Stang 25,801,726.15; a further petrol station company 9,406,784.68; Pato Comércio de Combustíveis 8,745,394.59 BRL). On motions for clarification (embargos) the Tribunal reduced, on 1 July 2026, the fines on Stang to 4,615,849.76 BRL and on Pato to 1,090,682.28 BRL owing to a subsequently arising fact relevant to the calculation, leaving 15,113,316.72 BRL. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.
Dividing lots in public tenders is a cartel infringement carrying heavy fines, even in small municipal procurement.
Division of tender lots between competitors
- Authority / court
- Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Lei nº 12.529/2011; Art. 38 VI (Handelsverbot für natürliche Personen)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- reduced
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Liability of senior managers
- Measures against individuals are not set out here.
- Published
- 13 May 2026
Original amount 15,113,316.72 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 13 May 2026.
- Diário Oficial da União, 22.05.2026, Seção 1, S. 54: Ata da 265ª Sessão Ordinária de Julgamento (13.05.2026), PA nº 08700.002545/2023-70 Official register or notice
- Diário Oficial da União, 08.07.2026, Seção 1, S. 132: Ata da 268ª Sessão Ordinária de Julgamento (01.07.2026), Embargos – Herabsetzung Official register or notice
- CADE, 13.05.2026: Cade condena empresas e empresários por cartel de combustíveis em Coronel Vivida/PR Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
12 May 2026 Société Wallonne des Eaux (SWDE)SWDE: 86,000 EUR for call recordings without sufficient transparency €86,000
The Walloon water utility recorded and listened in on customer calls for quality control and training purposes; the Litigation Chamber of the Autorité de protection des données (Belgian Data Protection Authority, APD/GBA) found infringements of transparency and fairness as well as in the engagement of a sub-processor. It imposed two fines totalling 86,000 EUR (85,000 + 1,000) after reducing the amounts in view of the situation of the public utility; an appeal against the decision has been lodged with the Market Court.
Anyone recording customer calls must clearly communicate purpose, legal basis and the parties involved in advance and engage service providers under proper contracts.
Recording of customer calls
- Authority / court
- Autorité de protection des données (APD/GBA) – Chambre Contentieuse
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 12 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 28 Abs. 3
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- APD – Décision quant au fond n° 102/2026 du 12 mai 2026 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
7 May 2026 South Staffordshire Plc und South Staffordshire Water PlcICO: almost £1 million against water supplier South Staffordshire after cyber attack €1.12m
In 2020, malware entered the water supplier's network via a phishing e-mail and remained undetected for around 20 months; in 2022, attackers obtained administrator rights and stole data on 633,887 people, which ended up on the dark web. The UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) criticised, among other things, monitoring of only 5% of the IT environment, outdated software such as Windows Server 2003 and a lack of vulnerability and patch management.
Utilities in critical infrastructure must also monitor their entire IT estate and replace legacy systems – an attack must not only come to light through performance problems.
Recognising phishing
- Authority / court
- Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- UK GDPR Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 32 Abs. 1
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- 40% reduction for early admission of liability; payment agreed without appeal.
- Published
- 11 May 2026
Original amount 963,900 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 May 2026.
- Fine of nearly £1m issued against South Staffordshire Plc and South Staffordshire Water Plc following major cyber attack and data breach Press release of an authority
- ICO Enforcement: South Staffordshire Plc and South Staffordshire Water Plc Enforcement database of an authority
- ICO Monetary Penalty Notice: South Staffordshire Plc and South Staffordshire Water Plc Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
7 May 2026 Sydney Water CorporationSydney Water: AUD 240,000 penalty after sewage overflow in Carramar €147,975
In two incidents in July and August 2022 around 423,000 litres of untreated sewage escaped in Carramar because plant had not been properly maintained, affecting a residential property, a sports field, bushland and Prospect Creek. After a guilty plea, the Land and Environment Court convicted Sydney Water and imposed AUD 225,000 for breaching its environment protection licence and AUD 15,000 for failing without lawful excuse to provide CCTV footage requested by the EPA.
Operators of sewerage networks must ensure their plant is maintained and respond promptly to regulators’ information requests.
Maintenance of wastewater plant and cooperation with regulatory information requests
- Authority / court
- NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA NSW) / Land and Environment Court of NSW
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Bedingungen der Environment Protection Licence; Pflicht zur Vorlage von Informationen und Unterlagen gegenüber der EPA NSW
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Mitigating circumstances
- 25% discount for an early guilty plea.
- Published
- 7 May 2026
Original amount 240,000 AUD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 May 2026.
- EPA NSW: Sydney Water cops $240,000 penalty over Carramar sewage spill (7 May 2026) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
15 Apr 2026 Öffentliches Kommunalunternehmen (in der Mitteilung nicht namentlich genannt)Municipal company: 6,000 EUR for permanent GPS tracking of company vehicles €6,000
A provider of public utility services used GPS transmitters in company vehicles to record employees’ location data permanently and without cause, without defining a purpose, carrying out a balancing of interests or providing sufficient information. The Informacijski pooblaščenec (Information Commissioner of the Republic of Slovenia, IP) imposed 6,000 EUR on the company.
GPS data are not suitable for performance monitoring – consider less intrusive means before introduction and inform employees in advance.
GPS tracking and employee data protection
- Authority / court
- Informacijski pooblaščenec Republike Slovenije (IP)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Employee data
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 und Art. 6 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Liability of senior managers
- Measures against individuals are not reported here.
- Published
- 15 Apr 2026
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link
Report an error
30 Mar 2026 Energy Prices Direct LimitedICO: £160,000 fine for Energy Prices Direct over calls without TPS screening €184,325
The ICO fined Energy Prices Direct Limited, an energy switching broker, £160,000. The ICO found that the company had obtained contact details from public sources and list providers and did not screen them against the TPS/CTPS registers before making marketing calls. The legal basis is regulations 21 and 24 of PECR. Under the notice, timely payment reduces the amount by 20% to £128,000.
- Authority / court
- Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Marketing and consent
- Legal basis
- Regulations 21 und 24 PECR; section 55A DPA 1998
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
Original amount 160,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Mar 2026.
- ICO Enforcement: Energy Prices Direct Limited. Enthält Informationen des Information Commissioner's Office, lizenziert unter der Open Government Licence v3.0. Enforcement database of an authority
- Monetary Penalty Notice: Energy Prices Direct Limited (30 March 2026) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link
Report an error
18 Mar 2026 Nova Scotia PowerNova Scotia Power: commitments to the Privacy Commissioner after ransomware attack Other
Following a cyber attack in spring 2025 in which data of about 375,000 current and 540,000 former customers was exfiltrated, including bank account, driver's licence and social insurance numbers, Nova Scotia Power signed a compliance letter to the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. The company commits to delete customers' social insurance numbers and, by 31 October 2026, to submit an independent security assessment – including employee training and notification processes – and to report on implementing its recommendations; only then will the investigation be discontinued. According to the letter, the starting point was an employee clicking a link in a pop-up on a compromised website, which installed malware.
A single click on a fake pop-up can expose hundreds of thousands of customer records – training, limited admin rights and prompt notification belong together.
Fake update pop-ups and malware
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA); Einstellung nach Paragraph 12.2(1)(c) bei Erfüllung der Zusagen
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Published
- 25 Mar 2026
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
11 Mar 2026 National Grid Electricity Transmission plcNational Grid (NGET): 20 million GBP after neglected Harker substation €23.2m
Between 2016 and 2021, the transmission system operator did not adequately monitor, maintain and repair the civil structures of the 132 kV Harker substation near Carlisle – a hub for electricity exchange between Scotland and England – and thereby also delayed grid connections. NGET accepted the breaches and paid 20 million GBP into the Energy Industry Voluntary Redress Scheme.
Operators of critical networks must systematically inspect even the inconspicuous civil structures of their installations – a maintenance backlog becomes a threat to supply.
- Authority / court
- Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem)
- Area of law
- Other
- Legal basis
- Electricity Act 1989, s. 9(2); Standard Licence Condition B7 (Transmission Licence)
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
Original amount 20,000,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Mar 2026.
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
3 Mar 2026 John Wood Group PLCJohn Wood Group: incorrect financial results published – almost 13 million GBP €14.9m
The energy services company published incorrect results for the 2022 and 2023 financial years and for the first half of 2024; accounting judgements were influenced by the desire to maintain previously reported figures, and systems and controls were inadequate. The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) imposed a fine of 12,993,700 GBP (18,562,500 GBP without the 30 % discount).
Accounting judgements must not be geared to figures already communicated – this is a control failure, not a calculation error.
- Authority / court
- Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
- Area of law
- Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
- Legal basis
- Listing Rule 1.3.3R; Listing Principle 1
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Mitigating circumstances
- 30 % discount for early settlement and acceptance of the findings
- Published
- 4 Mar 2026
Original amount 12,993,700 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Mar 2026.
- FCA fines John Wood Group PLC for issuing misleading statements Press release of an authority
- 2026 fines Enforcement database of an authority
- FCA Final Notice: John Wood Group PLC (3 March 2026) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
3 Mar 2026 Killer GmbH & Co KG, Killer GmbHWaste cartel: €278,000 fine on waste firm Killer despite leniency status €278,000
The Kartellgericht (Cartel Court) fined Killer GmbH & Co KG and Killer GmbH allegedly 278,000 EUR for taking part in the nationwide waste management cartel from July 2002 to March 2021, mainly in Lower and Upper Austria and occasionally in Tyrol. The participants fixed prices, shared territories and customers and exchanged competitively sensitive information, including in tenders for waste collection. The fine was reduced because of leniency status and the consensual termination of the proceedings.
A leniency application made only after a dawn raid can reduce a fine but will not necessarily waive it; companies should investigate suspicions internally at an early stage.
Territorial and customer allocation in regional markets
- Authority / court
- Oberlandesgericht Wien als Kartellgericht (Antrag der Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- § 1 Abs. 1 KartG und Art. 101 Abs. 1 AEUV; § 29 Abs. 1 Z 1 lit. a und d KartG
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Repeat case
- no
- Mitigating circumstances
- Reduction for cooperation under the leniency programme and the consensual termination of the proceedings.
- Published
- 15 Sep 2026
Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
23 Feb 2026 Yorkshire Water Services LimitedYorkshire Water: 733,333 GBP fine for repeated sewage discharges into park brook €839,630
Between October 2018 and August 2019, untreated sewage entered a brook in Pools Brook Country Park on three occasions – due to a burst rising main, a blockage caused by wet wipes and a failing pipe coupling; during the first incident, fish died in the park lake. Yorkshire Water had already pleaded guilty in January 2024 and had not attended any of the interviews; the court imposed a fine of 733,333 GBP plus costs. According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2026, the company had around 4,481 employees.
After a first incident, the cause at the site must be remedied permanently; repeated discharges from the same pipe lead to high fines.
- Authority / court
- Derby Crown Court (Anklage: Environment Agency)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Regulations 12(1)(b) und 38(1)(a) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Employees
- 1,000 to 9,999
- Culpability
- negligent
- Repeat case
- yes
- Published
- 23 Feb 2026
Original amount 733,333 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Feb 2026.
- Yorkshire Water fined £733k after polluting country park stream Press release of an authority
- Companies House: Registereintrag Yorkshire Water Services Limited (02366682) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link
Report an error
20 Feb 2026 Clarence Colliery Pty LtdClarence Colliery: 543,500 AUD after mine water entered the Wollangambe River €325,508
Clarence Colliery Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of Centennial Coal Company, was sentenced by the Land and Environment Court of NSW after pleading guilty to five offences under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, after untreated mine water with elevated nickel and zinc levels from the coal mine near Lithgow entered the Wollangambe River in December 2023 and April 2024. The offences comprised two water pollution offences, a licence breach, non-compliance with a prevention notice and a pollution incident response plan that had not been tested for 269 days. The court imposed fines totalling 543,500 AUD and ordered 86,500 AUD for rehabilitation of Long Swamp; in addition, the EPA's legal and investigation costs of 170,000 AUD and 15,548 AUD are payable.
Pollution incident response plans must be tested regularly; here the failure was penalised separately for the first time.
Regularly testing pollution incident response plans
- Authority / court
- NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA NSW)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW) s 120(1) (zwei Fälle), s 64(1), s 97(1), s 153E; Zahlungsanordnung nach s 250(1)(e)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Repeat case
- yes
- Mitigating circumstances
- Early guilty pleas (25% discount).
- Published
- 23 Feb 2026
Original amount 543,500 AUD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 20 Feb 2026.
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
12 Feb 2026 Severn Trent Water LimitedSevern Trent: £1.5m enforcement undertaking after discharges into Broadway Brook €1.72m
The Environment Agency accepted an enforcement undertaking from Severn Trent Water under which the company pays £1,500,000 to Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust, covers the agency's costs and commits to remedial action. It concerns two unauthorised sewage discharges from the Blackminster treatment works near Evesham into Broadway Brook on 12 June and 20 August 2022 and a breach of permit conditions.
An enforcement undertaking avoids prosecution but can still entail payments running into millions.
Operating treatment works in line with the permit
- Authority / court
- Environment Agency
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Reg. 38(1) und 38(2) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010/2016
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
Original amount 1,500,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Feb 2026.
- Environment Agency: Enforcement undertakings accepted by the Environment Agency (Eintrag EU1099) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
29 Jan 2026 RASEMA s.r.o.; M – D – J, spol. s.r.o.; SIMA plus Krompachy, s.r.o.; BarCom spol. s.r.o.Photovoltaic tender: 1.1 million EUR – the contracting entity was also a cartel member €1.1m
In a tender for industrial photovoltaic installations that was to be financed from EU Structural Funds, three bidders coordinated their bids so that a pre-selected bidder would win; the contracting entity BarCom acted as facilitator. The Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) imposed a total of 1,098,200 EUR and three-year procurement bans on all four; the EU funding was refused because of the indications of competition infringements, and the collusion was proven by e-mails secured during the inspection.
A contracting entity that determines the winner of a funded tender in advance is itself liable under competition law and additionally risks losing the funding.
Collusion in funded procurement
- Authority / court
- Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz (Submissionsabsprache)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Culpability
- intentional
- Published
- 11 Feb 2026
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
28 Jan 2026 Repsol Soluciones Energéticas (vormals Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos), Solred, Campsa Estaciones de Servicio u. a. (5 Gesellschaften)CNMC: €20.5m fine and procurement ban for Repsol over margin squeeze €20.5m
The Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia (CNMC, Spanish competition and markets authority) imposed a fine of 20,500,000 EUR on Repsol group companies, for which Repsol S.A. and Repsol Customer Centric are also jointly and severally liable as parent companies: between April and December 2022 Repsol used its dominant position in the wholesale supply of motor fuels to service stations to squeeze the diesel margins of independent stations by raising wholesale prices while granting additional discounts to professional drivers at its own stations. In addition, three companies are barred for six months from public tenders for the supply of diesel fuel.
Vertically integrated dominant firms must set wholesale and retail prices so that equally efficient competitors at the downstream level can remain viable.
Margin squeeze by vertically integrated undertakings
- Authority / court
- Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia (CNMC)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Abuse of market power
- Legal basis
- Art. 2 und Art. 62.4.b) Ley 15/2007 de Defensa de la Competencia; Art. 102 AEUV; Vergabeverbot nach Art. 71.1.b) Ley 9/2017 de Contratos del Sector Público
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 3 Feb 2026
- CNMC, Resolución S/0011/22 DISTRIBUCIÓN HIDROCARBUROS (28.01.2026) Decision of an authority
- CNMC Expediente S/0011/22 - DISTRIBUCION HIDROCARBUROS Enforcement database of an authority
- La CNMC multa con 20,5 millones a varias empresas del Grupo Repsol y les prohíbe participar en contratos públicos Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
23 Jan 2026 EDP Comercial – Comercialização de Energia, S.A.Portugal: €130,000 for EDP Comercial over disconnections and a banned clause €130,000
The energy regulator punished 13 offences by EDP Comercial with a combined fine of 260,000 EUR, halved to 130,000 EUR in the settlement procedure. The offences included supplier switches without explicit consent or without checking entitlement, unlawful disconnections and capacity reductions, missed call-centre response targets in 2023 and 2024, an absolutely prohibited standard contract clause and a marketing message that did not disclose its commercial purpose.
Contract clauses and marketing texts need a legal check before use, just as every disconnection does before it is carried out.
Standard terms review, customer communication and disconnection processes in energy sales
- Authority / court
- Entidade Reguladora dos Serviços Energéticos (ERSE)
- Area of law
- Consumer protection and online retail
- Legal basis
- Lei n.º 9/2013 (RSSE) i. V. m. RRC 2021/2023, RQS 2023 und Diretiva ERSE n.º 22/2022; Art. 18 Decreto-Lei n.º 446/85; Art. 9 Decreto-Lei n.º 57/2008 i. V. m. RJCE
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- Partial admission, cooperation, evidence of remediation, the company's financial situation and compensation of six customers (50 EUR each) were taken into account in the settlement procedure.
- ERSE, Decisões sancionatórias 2026: Processo 01/2023 – EDP Comercial – Comercialização de Energia, S.A. Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
5 Jan 2026 Portugal: 16,000 EUR against filling station operator for forwarding complaints late €16,000
A filling station operator (medium-sized company, name not published) did not send the originals of eight sheets from the statutory complaints book to the authority on time. The Entidade Reguladora dos Serviços Energéticos (Portuguese Energy Services Regulatory Authority, ERSE) imposed 16,000 EUR for eight negligent administrative offences; the Competition, Regulation and Supervision Court upheld the fine in full on 14 July 2026.
Even formal obligations such as forwarding complaints book sheets are sanctioned per case – branch staff must know the procedure.
Timely forwarding of customer complaints from the complaints book
- Authority / court
- Entidade Reguladora dos Serviços Energéticos (ERSE)
- Area of law
- Consumer protection and online retail
- Legal basis
- Decreto-Lei n.º 156/2005 (Livro de Reclamações); Regime Jurídico das Contraordenações Económicas, Art. 18, 19
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Employees
- 50 to 249
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- No previous record, no economic advantage
- ERSE – Decisões sancionatórias: Processo n.º 15/2024 – Postos de abastecimento de combustíveis Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
24 Dec 2025 ΗΡΩΝ Α.Ε. Ενεργειακών Υπηρεσιών (Heron), ICOMM Call Center I.K.E. und ein weiteres Callcenter (Einpersonengesellschaft, anonymisiert)Heron and call centres fined EUR 165,000 for calls despite opt-out list €165,000
Following numerous complaints about marketing calls for Heron, the Archi Prostasias Dedomenon (Hellenic Data Protection Authority) found in Decision 43/2025 shortcomings in the controls over the call centres engaged and in security measures, with the result that subscribers on the opt-out register under Art. 11 of Law 3471/2006 were also called; in addition, some data had been collected unlawfully. It imposed a total of EUR 165,000: EUR 115,000 on Heron (Art. 32 GDPR) together with a warning and an order to introduce, within six months, an audit procedure for call-centre partners with checks at least once a year, EUR 35,000 on ICOMM (5,000 Art. 32, 10,000 Art. 29, 20,000 Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR) with an erasure order, and EUR 15,000 on a further call centre (Art. 32 GDPR).
Outsourcing telemarketing requires regular, sample-based audits of partners – responsibility for opt-out lists stays with the principal.
Telemarketing through service providers and screening against opt-out lists
- Authority / court
- Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic Data Protection Authority)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Marketing and consent
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, Art. 29, Art. 32, Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. d, f und i DSGVO; Art. 11 ν. 3471/2006; Art. 21 ν. 2472/1997 i. V. m. Art. 84 ν. 4624/2019
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Απόφαση 43/2025 (Αθήνα, 24-12-2025) Decision of an authority
- Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων – Προώθηση προϊόντων και υπηρεσιών από πάροχο υπηρεσιών ενέργειας (Ημερομηνία 24/12/2025) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
23 Dec 2025 Perenco UK LimitedPerenco UK: enforcement undertaking after oil spill in Poole Harbour €459,900
The Environment Agency accepted an enforcement undertaking from Perenco UK: the company pays £401,447 to five local organisations (£60,000, £30,000, £200,547, £10,000 and £100,900), covers the agency's costs and commits to remedial measures. The underlying offence was a breach of a permit condition: an inadequately maintained oil pipe at the Wytch Farm site had corroded, and on 23 March 2023 crude oil or reservoir fluid escaped into Ower Bay in Poole Harbour. According to the agency, the overall package amounts to around £6.1m, including response and clean-up costs and £620,000 paid to affected parties.
Corrosion inspections must be designed to detect wall loss that progresses faster than expected.
Pipeline integrity and corrosion monitoring
- Authority / court
- Environment Agency
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Reg. 38(2) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010/2016; Environmental Civil Sanctions (England) Order 2010
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Mitigating circumstances
- Substantial costs already incurred for response and clean-up, and measures taken to prevent a recurrence (the agency's reasons for accepting the offer).
- Published
- 13 Mar 2026
Original amount 401,447 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Dec 2025.
- Environment Agency: Enforcement undertakings accepted by the Environment Agency (Eintrag EU1138) Enforcement database of an authority
- Environment Agency: Major oil spill in Poole Harbour costs company £6m (13.03.2026) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
22 Dec 2025 Curenergía Comercializador de Último Recurso, S.A.U.AEPD: 500,000 EUR against energy supplier Curenergía after misdirected message in dual chat €500,000
An employee of the customer service provider was serving two customers in chat at the same time and assigned one customer's e-mail address to the other; as a result, the complainant received the name, debts and billing data of a stranger. The Spanish data protection authority (Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, AEPD) saw the cause in the process design, which allowed parallel chats, and imposed 500,000 EUR for lack of data protection by design; the request for reconsideration was rejected.
Design service channels so that mix-ups between customers are technically harder – an individual error can be an organisational failure.
Diligence in customer service / misdirected messages
- Authority / court
- Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data processors
- Legal basis
- Art. 25 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- AEPD Resolución PS/00190/2024 (EXP202316394) Decision of an authority
- AEPD Resolución recurso de reposición PS/00190/2024 (Datum der Ausgangsentscheidung 22.12.2025) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
18 Dec 2025 Werbendes Unternehmen aus dem Energiesektor (anonymisiert)BNetzA: €210,000 fine on energy company over contracts foisted on consumers by phone €210,000
The Bundesnetzagentur (Federal Network Agency) fined an energy company 210,000 EUR for unlawful telephone advertising. Callers often posed as the consumer's energy supplier, and in many cases contracts were foisted on the people called; the company has appealed.
Anyone marketing by phone needs verifiable prior consent and must not pose as the existing supplier of the people called.
Consent and proof of consent for telephone marketing
- Authority / court
- Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Marketing and consent
- Legal basis
- UWG – Verbot unerlaubter Telefonwerbung gegenüber Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- BNetzA: Bußgelder Unerlaubte Telefonwerbung (laufende Liste mit Einzelmeldungen) Enforcement database of an authority
- BNetzA-Pressemitteilung 26.01.2026: Erneuter Anstieg der Beschwerdezahlen (Bußgelder 2025) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
18 Dec 2025 Werbendes Unternehmen aus dem Sektor Photovoltaik (anonymisiert)BNetzA: €100,500 fine on solar panel seller over disguised sales calls €100,500
The Bundesnetzagentur (Federal Network Agency) imposed fines totalling 100,500 EUR on a solar photovoltaic company: 66,000 EUR for unlawful telephone advertising and 34,500 EUR for withholding caller numbers on sales calls. Callers concealed who the calls were really for and in some cases falsely presented sales calls as mere advisory calls.
Even a business that merely commissions sales calls can itself be fined – consent of the people called should be checked before a campaign starts.
Consent and proof of consent for telephone marketing
- Authority / court
- Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Marketing and consent
- Legal basis
- UWG – Verbot unerlaubter Telefonwerbung gegenüber Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern; Verbot der Rufnummernunterdrückung bei Werbeanrufen
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- BNetzA: Bußgelder Unerlaubte Telefonwerbung (laufende Liste mit Einzelmeldungen) Enforcement database of an authority
- BNetzA-Pressemitteilung 26.01.2026: Erneuter Anstieg der Beschwerdezahlen (Bußgelder 2025) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
1 Dec 2025 SUROVINA d.o.o.; SALOMON d.o.o.; RECIKEL d.o.o.; DINOS d.o.o.Packaging waste: AVK finds market sharing by four waste management companies Order
In the reopened proceedings, the Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (Slovenian Competition Protection Agency, AVK) found that the companies had shared the market for take-back schemes for packaging waste and agreed to stop providing their services to a competitor (now Interzero). The authority ordered immediate termination; the decision is not final, and an earlier decision from 2019 in the same matter is partly final.
An agreement to stop supplying a common competitor is a cartel – even in regulated waste management markets.
Boycott and market-sharing agreements
- Authority / court
- Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (AVK)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Art. 6 ZPOmK-1, Art. 101 AEUV
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Published
- 16 Apr 2026
- Izrek odločbe z dne 1. 12. 2025 (3062-5/2017) Decision of an authority
- AVK – Odločitve agencije Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link
Report an error
25 Nov 2025 Shell UK LimitedShell UK: £560,000 fine after hydrocarbon release on Brent Charlie €637,233
Shell UK pleaded guilty to two charges under the offshore fire and explosion regulations (PFEER 1995) and was fined £560,000. On 19 May 2017, around 200 kg of gas and 1,550 kg of crude oil escaped into a concrete leg of the Brent Charlie platform from corroded pipework that had originally been installed only temporarily; the ventilation systems had also been inadequately maintained. More than 170 people on board were exposed to a potential fire and explosion risk.
Temporary installations need a fixed removal date and, until then, their own inspection regime.
Management of change for temporary pipework
- Authority / court
- Aberdeen Sheriff Court (Ermittlung: Health and Safety Executive)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
- Legal basis
- Offshore Installations (Prevention of Fire and Explosion, and Emergency Response) Regulations 1995 (PFEER), zwei Anklagepunkte
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Mitigating circumstances
- Guilty plea; the court set the fine after taking mitigating factors into account.
- Published
- 28 Nov 2025
Original amount 560,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 25 Nov 2025.
- HSE: Shell UK fined £560,000 following major hydrocarbon release (28.11.2025) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link