Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,033 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by regionAll jurisdictions
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by company- Anonymised companies 22 cases 21 % · €327.8m
- Yorkshire Water Services Limited 3 cases 3 % · €2.26m
- Southern Water 2 cases 2 % · €11.3m
- Trafigura Beheer B.V. 2 cases 2 % · €213.2m
- Werbendes Unternehmen aus dem Energiesektor (anonymisiert) 2 cases 2 % · €340,000
- Acea Energia S.p.A. 1 case 1 % · €3m
- Adani Enterprises Limited 1 case 1 % · €236.1m
- Anglian Water Services Limited 1 case 1 % · €362,319
- Audax Renovables, S.A. – Sucursal em Portugal 1 case 1 % · €22,000
- Avila Energy Corporation 1 case 1 % · €40,005
- 70 more70 cases
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 2023 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2025 | 1 | €34m |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2026 | 0 | – |
1 case
17 Jan 2025 HF Sinclair Navajo Refining LLCHF Sinclair Navajo Refining: USD 35m for air violations at Artesia refinery €34m
Under a consent decree with the EPA, the US Department of Justice and the New Mexico Environment Department, HF Sinclair Navajo Refining will allegedly pay a total of 35,000,000 USD for its refinery in Artesia (New Mexico): a civil penalty of 33,916,450 USD for excess emissions of, among others, benzene, volatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides and sulphur dioxide, and 1,083,550 USD for breaches of a 2002 settlement; the civil penalty is split between the federal government and New Mexico. In addition, measures estimated at USD 137m are required, including real-time air monitors at the fenceline and in the town with publicly available results, and a flare gas recovery system. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment. The decision is not final.
Fenceline monitoring obligations require documented root cause analyses and corrective action as soon as action levels are exceeded.
Fenceline emission monitoring
- Authority / court
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) / U.S. Department of Justice mit New Mexico Environment Department (U.S. District Court, District of New Mexico)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Clean Air Act (NESHAP für Erdölraffinerien und Benzolabfälle, NSPS, Title-V-Genehmigung); New Mexico Air Quality Control Act; Consent Decree von 2002
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Repeat case
- yes
- Published
- 17 Jan 2025
Original amount 35,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Jan 2025.
- EPA: 2025 HF Sinclair Navajo Clean Air Act Settlement Agreement Summary Press release of an authority
- Lodged Consent Decree, United States and NMED v. HF Sinclair Navajo Refining LLC, Case 1:25-cv-00054 (D.N.M.), filed 17.01.2025 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link