Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by authority- Informacijski pooblaščenec Republike Slovenije (IP) €6,000 100 % · 1 case
- Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (AVK) — 0 % · 1 case
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by companyWhen?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2025 | 1 | — |
| Q1 2026 | 0 | — |
| Q2 2026 | 1 | €6,000 |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | — |
2 cases
15 Apr 2026 Öffentliches Kommunalunternehmen (in der Mitteilung nicht namentlich genannt)Municipal company: 6,000 EUR for permanent GPS tracking of company vehicles €6,000
A provider of public utility services used GPS transmitters in company vehicles to record employees’ location data permanently and without cause, without defining a purpose, carrying out a balancing of interests or providing sufficient information. The Informacijski pooblaščenec (Information Commissioner of the Republic of Slovenia, IP) imposed 6,000 EUR on the company and 600 EUR on the responsible person.
GPS data are not suitable for performance monitoring – consider less intrusive means before introduction and inform employees in advance.
GPS tracking and employee data protection
- Authority / court
- Informacijski pooblaščenec Republike Slovenije (IP)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Employee data
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 und Art. 6 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Liability of senior managers
- Additional fine of 600 EUR on the responsible person.
- Published
- 15 Apr 2026
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
1 Dec 2025 SUROVINA d.o.o.; SALOMON d.o.o.; RECIKEL d.o.o.; DINOS d.o.o.Packaging waste: AVK finds market sharing by four waste management companies Order
In the reopened proceedings, the Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (Slovenian Competition Protection Agency, AVK) found that the companies had shared the market for take-back schemes for packaging waste and agreed to stop providing their services to a competitor (now Interzero). The authority ordered immediate termination; the decision is not final, and an earlier decision from 2019 in the same matter is partly final.
An agreement to stop supplying a common competitor is a cartel – even in regulated waste management markets.
Boycott and market-sharing agreements
- Authority / court
- Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (AVK)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Art. 6 ZPOmK-1, Art. 101 AEUV (3062-5/2017)
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Published
- 16 Apr 2026
- Izrek odločbe z dne 1. 12. 2025 (3062-5/2017) Decision of an authority
- AVK – Odločitve agencije Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link