Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

35cases from 1 jurisdiction
€500.5mTotal of monetary amounts
€316.9mLargest single case: a UK commodities trader
€1.12mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Serious Fraud Office (SFO); Southwark Crown Court €316.9m 63 % · 1 case
  2. Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) €139.2m 28 % · 9 cases
  3. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) €14.9m 3 % · 1 case
  4. Canterbury Crown Court (Anklage: Environment Agency) €8.38m 2 % · 1 case
  5. Environment Agency €3.37m 1 % · 3 cases
  6. Bromley Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Environment Agency) €2.9m 1 % · 1 case
  7. Plymouth Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Environment Agency) €2.43m 0 % · 1 case
  8. Cannock Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Environment Agency) €2.42m 0 % · 1 case
  9. Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) €1.59m 0 % · 5 cases
  10. Southampton Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive) €1.16m 0 % · 1 case
  11. 11 more€7.26m

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Bribery and corruption €316.9m 63 % · 1 case
  2. Environment and sustainability €54.5m 11 % · 15 cases
  3. Competition law €39m 8 % · 1 case
  4. Consumer protection and online retail €38.2m 8 % · 4 cases
  5. Other €32.7m 7 % · 4 cases
  6. Capital markets and financial supervision €14.9m 3 % · 1 case
  7. Health and safety and employment law €2.16m 0 % · 3 cases
  8. Data protection €1.59m 0 % · 5 cases
  9. Sanctions and export control €660,160 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. Anonymised companies €392.9m 78 % · 10 cases
  2. National Grid Electricity Transmission plc €23.2m 5 % · 1 case
  3. E.ON Next €17.4m 3 % · 1 case
  4. John Wood Group PLC €14.9m 3 % · 1 case
  5. OVO Energy Limited €12m 2 % · 1 case
  6. Southern Water €11.3m 2 % · 2 cases
  7. Opus Energy Limited €8.48m 2 % · 1 case
  8. Southern Gas Networks plc €6.89m 1 % · 1 case
  9. Yorkshire Water Services Limited €2.26m 0 % · 3 cases
  10. Cadent Gas Limited €1.78m 0 % · 1 case
  11. 13 more€9.48m

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20222€317.9m
20234€2.72m
20249€99.5m
20258€12.3m
202612€68.2m

35 cases

22 Sep 2026 Southern WaterSouthern Water: 2.4 million GBP fine for sewage and diesel pollution in Kent United KingdomEmissions and permits €2.9m

Between 2019 and 2021, untreated sewage, sewage residues, diesel from a generator and waste entered a stream and the sea around Faversham and Whitstable; the circumstances of one incident were not reported to the Environment Agency, around 70 fish died, and bathing warnings were in place at beaches in Tankerton and Herne Bay for almost a week. The court imposed a fine of 2,416,666.67 GBP, 69,894.04 GBP in costs and a 190 GBP victim surcharge; it was the company's second conviction that year (announcement of 22 September 2026, exact date of judgment not stated). According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2026, the company had around 3,109 employees.

What organisations can take from it

Repeated pollution and failure to report incidents lead to a series of prosecutions with rising fines.

Relevance to training and awareness

Reporting environmental incidents to the regulator

Authority / court
Bromley Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Environment Agency)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Regulations 12(1)(b) und 38(1)(a) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Employees
1,000 to 9,999
Repeat case
yes
Published
22 Sep 2026

Original amount 2,486,750.71 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

8 Sep 2026 United Utilities Water LimitedUnited Utilities: record fine of 900,000 GBP after sewage flood on the Fylde coast United KingdomEmissions and permits €1.12m

Following a partial pipe collapse at the Fleetwood wastewater treatment works, untreated sewage flowed from three pumping stations into the Irish Sea for over 35 hours in June 2023; seven bathing waters were affected and shellfish beds were closed. The water company pleaded guilty to five offences and must pay a fine of 900,000 GBP, 62,225 GBP in costs and a 2,000 GBP victim surcharge. According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2026, the company had around 6,678 full-time equivalent employees.

What organisations can take from it

The condition and redundancy of critical wastewater infrastructure are a permit obligation; the Environment Agency assessed the failure as reckless and in the highest harm category.

Authority / court
Preston Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Environment Agency)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Regulation 38(2) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Employees
1,000 to 9,999
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
Around 38 million GBP invested in response and repair, and a voluntary payment of 250,000 GBP to Blackpool Council.
Published
8 Sep 2026

Original amount 964,225 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 8 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Jul 2026 Southern WaterSouthern Water: £7.1m fine for repeated sewage discharges in Kent United KingdomEmissions and permits €8.38m

Canterbury Crown Court fined Southern Water £7,127,083 for 13 breaches of the Environmental Permitting Regulations 2016, plus £149,000 in prosecution costs and a £181 victim surcharge. Between 2019 and 2021, failed pumps and poorly maintained equipment at the Margate and Broadstairs pumping stations led to several discharges of untreated sewage into the sea, some of which were reported only the next day or weeks later; beaches had to be closed. The company also admitted 35 further unlawful discharges from the same period.

What organisations can take from it

Maintaining critical pumping equipment and reporting every discharge to the regulator immediately are core duties of any permit holder.

Relevance to training and awareness

Plant maintenance and prompt reporting of environmental incidents

Authority / court
Canterbury Crown Court (Anklage: Environment Agency)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Reg. 12(1)(b) und 38(1)(a) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Repeat case
yes
Published
17 Jul 2026

Original amount 7,127,083 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

29 Jun 2026 Petrofac Facilities Management LimitedPetrofac Facilities Management: £569,157 settlement over Russia sanctions breaches United KingdomBreaches of sanctions and embargoes €660,160

The company paid HMRC a compound settlement of £569,157.07 for alleged breaches of the Russia sanctions. According to HMRC, while withdrawing from Russia in 2022/2023 it allegedly made sanctioned industrial goods available on two occasions to a person connected with Russia or for use in Russia, and provided related technical assistance. According to HMRC, this is the first time it has publicly named the company behind such a settlement.

What organisations can take from it

Even when withdrawing from a sanctioned market, the prohibitions on making goods available and on technical assistance apply in full.

Relevance to training and awareness

Sanctions screening of goods supplied and technical assistance when exiting a market

Authority / court
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Reg. 46Y(2)(c) und Reg. 46Z(1)(b) Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary disclosure and full cooperation with HMRC.
Published
29 Jun 2026

Original amount 569,157.07 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 29 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

12 Jun 2026 Esso Petroleum Company LimitedEsso: £1m fine after LPG release at Fawley refinery United KingdomWorkplace safety and accidents €1.16m

Esso was fined £1m and ordered to pay £12,277 in costs. On 8 November 2022, a corroded steel tower at the Fawley refinery partially collapsed, damaged pipework and released around 2,400 kg of liquefied petroleum gas over 33 hours; workers were exposed to the risk of falling debris and potential burns. According to the Health and Safety Executive's investigation, the corrosion had been known since 2010 without appropriate action being taken.

What organisations can take from it

Known corrosion findings on load-bearing structures must be assessed and remedied promptly, before they lead to a major incident.

Relevance to training and awareness

Asset integrity and handling known corrosion findings

Authority / court
Southampton Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Section 3(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Mitigating circumstances
Guilty plea; no injuries.
Published
15 Jun 2026

Original amount 1,000,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Jun 2026 OVO Energy LimitedOfgem: OVO pays GBP 10.4m over poor support for vulnerable prepayment customers United KingdomConsumer protection and online retail €12m

Ofgem found that OVO Energy did not adequately monitor prepayment customers in vulnerable situations, did not properly support customers who self-disconnected and did not maintain the Priority Services Register properly; some internal training materials were unclear and contradictory. By way of alternative action, OVO is paying GBP 7m into the voluntary redress fund and providing GBP 3.4m in credit and debt relief to its most vulnerable customers; under a separate compliance engagement it is also paying GBP 1.1m to customers in the Scottish Highlands and Islands.

What organisations can take from it

Policies on paper are not enough: training materials and processes for vulnerable customers must be consistent and checked in practice.

Relevance to training and awareness

Dealing with customers in vulnerable situations

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail
Legal basis
Standard Licence Conditions 26.1, 26.4, 26.5(d)(f), 27A.1, 28.1A/28.1B, 28.2 und 28.4 der Gas- und Stromversorgungslizenzen
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities
Mitigating circumstances
Remedial action during the investigation, including welfare visits to customers who had been disconnected for more than 72 hours.
Published
3 Jun 2026

Original amount 10,400,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

7 May 2026 South Staffordshire Plc und South Staffordshire Water PlcICO: almost £1 million against water supplier South Staffordshire after cyber attack United KingdomData breaches and data security €1.12m

In 2020, malware entered the water supplier's network via a phishing e-mail and remained undetected for around 20 months; in 2022, attackers obtained administrator rights and stole data on 633,887 people, which ended up on the dark web. The UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) criticised, among other things, monitoring of only 5% of the IT environment, outdated software such as Windows Server 2003 and a lack of vulnerability and patch management.

What organisations can take from it

Utilities in critical infrastructure must also monitor their entire IT estate and replace legacy systems – an attack must not only come to light through performance problems.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising phishing

Authority / court
Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
UK GDPR Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 32 Abs. 1
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
40% reduction for early admission of liability; payment agreed without appeal.
Published
11 May 2026

Original amount 963,900 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 May 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 Mar 2026 Energy Prices Direct LimitedICO: £160,000 fine for Energy Prices Direct over calls without TPS screening United KingdomMarketing and consent €184,325

The ICO fined Energy Prices Direct Limited, an energy switching broker, £160,000. The ICO found that the company had obtained contact details from public sources and list providers and did not screen them against the TPS/CTPS registers before making marketing calls. The legal basis is regulations 21 and 24 of PECR. Under the notice, timely payment reduces the amount by 20% to £128,000.

Authority / court
Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
Regulations 21 und 24 PECR; section 55A DPA 1998
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities

Original amount 160,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Mar 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

11 Mar 2026 National Grid Electricity Transmission plcNational Grid (NGET): 20 million GBP after neglected Harker substation United KingdomOther €23.2m

Between 2016 and 2021, the transmission system operator did not adequately monitor, maintain and repair the civil structures of the 132 kV Harker substation near Carlisle – a hub for electricity exchange between Scotland and England – and thereby also delayed grid connections. NGET accepted the breaches and paid 20 million GBP into the Energy Industry Voluntary Redress Scheme.

What organisations can take from it

Operators of critical networks must systematically inspect even the inconspicuous civil structures of their installations – a maintenance backlog becomes a threat to supply.

Authority / court
Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem)
Area of law
Other
Legal basis
Electricity Act 1989, s. 9(2); Standard Licence Condition B7 (Transmission Licence)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities

Original amount 20,000,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Mar 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Mar 2026 John Wood Group PLCJohn Wood Group: incorrect financial results published – almost 13 million GBP United KingdomDisclosure and reporting obligations €14.9m

The energy services company published incorrect results for the 2022 and 2023 financial years and for the first half of 2024; accounting judgements were influenced by the desire to maintain previously reported figures, and systems and controls were inadequate. The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) imposed a fine of 12,993,700 GBP (18,562,500 GBP without the 30 % discount).

What organisations can take from it

Accounting judgements must not be geared to figures already communicated – this is a control failure, not a calculation error.

Authority / court
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Listing Rule 1.3.3R; Listing Principle 1
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities
Employees
10,000 or more
Mitigating circumstances
30 % discount for early settlement and acceptance of the findings
Published
4 Mar 2026

Original amount 12,993,700 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Mar 2026.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Feb 2026 Yorkshire Water Services LimitedYorkshire Water: 733,333 GBP fine for repeated sewage discharges into park brook United KingdomEmissions and permits €839,630

Between October 2018 and August 2019, untreated sewage entered a brook in Pools Brook Country Park on three occasions – due to a burst rising main, a blockage caused by wet wipes and a failing pipe coupling; during the first incident, fish died in the park lake. Yorkshire Water had already pleaded guilty in January 2024 and had not attended any of the interviews; the court imposed a fine of 733,333 GBP plus costs. According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2026, the company had around 4,481 employees.

What organisations can take from it

After a first incident, the cause at the site must be remedied permanently; repeated discharges from the same pipe lead to high fines.

Authority / court
Derby Crown Court (Anklage: Environment Agency)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Regulations 12(1)(b) und 38(1)(a) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Employees
1,000 to 9,999
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
yes
Published
23 Feb 2026

Original amount 733,333 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

12 Feb 2026 Severn Trent Water LimitedSevern Trent: £1.5m enforcement undertaking after discharges into Broadway Brook United KingdomEmissions and permits €1.72m

The Environment Agency accepted an enforcement undertaking from Severn Trent Water under which the company pays £1,500,000 to Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust, covers the agency's costs and commits to remedial action. It concerns two unauthorised sewage discharges from the Blackminster treatment works near Evesham into Broadway Brook on 12 June and 20 August 2022 and a breach of permit conditions.

What organisations can take from it

An enforcement undertaking avoids prosecution but can still entail payments running into millions.

Relevance to training and awareness

Operating treatment works in line with the permit

Authority / court
Environment Agency
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Reg. 38(1) und 38(2) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010/2016
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities

Original amount 1,500,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Dec 2025 Perenco UK LimitedPerenco UK: enforcement undertaking after oil spill in Poole Harbour United KingdomEmissions and permits €459,900

The Environment Agency accepted an enforcement undertaking from Perenco UK: the company pays £401,447 to five local organisations (£60,000, £30,000, £200,547, £10,000 and £100,900), covers the agency's costs and commits to remedial measures. The underlying offence was a breach of a permit condition: an inadequately maintained oil pipe at the Wytch Farm site had corroded, and on 23 March 2023 crude oil or reservoir fluid escaped into Ower Bay in Poole Harbour. According to the agency, the overall package amounts to around £6.1m, including response and clean-up costs and £620,000 paid to affected parties.

What organisations can take from it

Corrosion inspections must be designed to detect wall loss that progresses faster than expected.

Relevance to training and awareness

Pipeline integrity and corrosion monitoring

Authority / court
Environment Agency
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Reg. 38(2) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010/2016; Environmental Civil Sanctions (England) Order 2010
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities
Mitigating circumstances
Substantial costs already incurred for response and clean-up, and measures taken to prevent a recurrence (the agency's reasons for accepting the offer).
Published
13 Mar 2026

Original amount 401,447 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Dec 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

25 Nov 2025 Shell UK LimitedShell UK: £560,000 fine after hydrocarbon release on Brent Charlie United KingdomWorkplace safety and accidents €637,233

Shell UK pleaded guilty to two charges under the offshore fire and explosion regulations (PFEER 1995) and was fined £560,000. On 19 May 2017, around 200 kg of gas and 1,550 kg of crude oil escaped into a concrete leg of the Brent Charlie platform from corroded pipework that had originally been installed only temporarily; the ventilation systems had also been inadequately maintained. More than 170 people on board were exposed to a potential fire and explosion risk.

What organisations can take from it

Temporary installations need a fixed removal date and, until then, their own inspection regime.

Relevance to training and awareness

Management of change for temporary pipework

Authority / court
Aberdeen Sheriff Court (Ermittlung: Health and Safety Executive)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Offshore Installations (Prevention of Fire and Explosion, and Emergency Response) Regulations 1995 (PFEER), zwei Anklagepunkte
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities
Mitigating circumstances
Guilty plea; the court set the fine after taking mitigating factors into account.
Published
28 Nov 2025

Original amount 560,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 25 Nov 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 Jul 2025 Yorkshire Water Services LimitedYorkshire Water: chlorinated water kills more than 430 fish – 865,000 GBP United KingdomEmissions and permits €1m

After an inlet valve failed at Ingbirchworth water treatment works, around one million litres of chlorinated water a day flowed via the emergency overflow into Ingbirchworth Dike from November 2017; more than 430 dead fish were found on a single day. The capacity alarm was set above the overflow level; fine of 865,000 GBP plus 34,979.79 GBP in costs. According to its annual accounts (to March 2026), the utility employed an average of 4,481 people.

What organisations can take from it

Set alarm thresholds so that they trigger before the point of damage – monitoring that only reports after an overflow is not a control.

Authority / court
Sheffield Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Environment Agency)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Regulation 12(1)(b) und 38(1)(a) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Employees
1,000 to 9,999
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
yes
Published
31 Jul 2025

Original amount 865,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Jul 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Jun 2025 Farringdon Energy Limited (Handelsname Champion Energy)Ofgem: GBP 214,580 fine for Farringdon Energy over direct debits without supply United KingdomConsumer protection and online retail €251,766

Ofgem found that the business electricity supplier lacked robust, documented processes – they relied on the knowledge of a single employee – and therefore collected direct debits from customers it was not, or no longer, supplying; 25 customers suffered a detriment of around GBP 175,000. Following a provisional order in May 2024, the authority confirmed a penalty of GBP 223,676, from which it deducted GBP 9,096 in goodwill payments already made, leaving GBP 214,580 to pay.

What organisations can take from it

Even micro-businesses need documented processes – knowledge held by only one employee is not compliance.

Relevance to training and awareness

Documented processes instead of knowledge held by one person

Authority / court
Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) für die Gas and Electricity Markets Authority
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail
Legal basis
Standard Licence Condition 4A.1 der Stromversorgungslizenz; section 27A Electricity Act 1989
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Employees
Under 50
Mitigating circumstances
Remedial action after the provisional order; goodwill payments of GBP 9,096 already made were credited.
Published
19 Jun 2025

Original amount 214,580 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Jun 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 May 2025 Southern Gas Networks plcSouthern Gas Networks plc: 5.8 million GBP – gas leaks attended too slowly United KingdomOther €6.89m

In 2022/23, the gas distribution network operator failed to meet the licence requirement in its southern England network to attend 97% of reported gas escapes within one or two hours respectively. Following self-reporting, it acknowledged the breach and paid 5.8 million GBP into the Energy Industry Voluntary Redress Fund; the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) pointed to the significant risk to the public.

What organisations can take from it

Emergency response times are a core duty for utility networks – staff and deployment planning must also cover peak loads.

Authority / court
Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem)
Area of law
Other
Legal basis
Gas Transporter Licence, Standard Special Condition D10 2(h)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities
Mitigating circumstances
Self-reporting before the formal data submission; targets met for two years since.

Original amount 5,800,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 May 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 May 2025 Cadent Gas LimitedCadent Gas Limited: 1.5 million GBP – gas leaks attended too slowly United KingdomOther €1.78m

In 2022/23, the gas distribution network operator failed to meet the licence requirement in its North London and North West networks to attend 97% of reported gas escapes within one or two hours respectively. Following self-reporting, it acknowledged the breach and paid 1.5 million GBP into the Energy Industry Voluntary Redress Fund; the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) pointed to the significant risk to the public.

What organisations can take from it

Emergency response times are a core duty for utility networks – staff and deployment planning must also cover peak loads.

Authority / court
Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem)
Area of law
Other
Legal basis
Gas Transporter Licence, Standard Special Condition D10 2(h)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities
Mitigating circumstances
Self-reporting before the formal data submission; targets met for two years since.

Original amount 1,500,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 May 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 May 2025 Scotland Gas Networks plcScotland Gas Networks plc: 700,000 GBP – gas leaks attended too slowly United KingdomOther €832,145

In 2022/23, the gas distribution network operator failed to meet the licence requirement in its Scottish network to attend 97% of reported gas escapes within one or two hours respectively. Following self-reporting, it acknowledged the breach and paid 700,000 GBP into the Energy Industry Voluntary Redress Fund; the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) pointed to the significant risk to the public.

What organisations can take from it

Emergency response times are a core duty for utility networks – staff and deployment planning must also cover peak loads.

Authority / court
Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem)
Area of law
Other
Legal basis
Gas Transporter Licence, Standard Special Condition D10 2(h)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities
Mitigating circumstances
Self-reporting before the formal data submission; targets met for two years since.

Original amount 700,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 May 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 May 2025 Yorkshire Water Services LimitedYorkshire Water: faulty backup pump ignored for months – 350,000 GBP United KingdomEmissions and permits €416,072

The backup pump at Fossbridge pumping station in York was out of action for five months, although the defect had repeatedly been noted during maintenance; as a result, sewage flowed into Foss Dyke in March 2018. For the discharge and the breach of the maintenance permit condition, the court imposed 350,000 GBP plus 14,028.65 GBP in costs. According to its annual accounts (to March 2026), the utility employed an average of 4,481 people (previous year 3,876).

What organisations can take from it

Give repair orders for emergency equipment deadlines and escalation – a defect noted repeatedly is proof of knowledge in court.

Authority / court
York Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Environment Agency)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Regulation 12(1)(b), 38(1)(a) und 38(2) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Employees
1,000 to 9,999
Published
30 May 2025

Original amount 350,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 May 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Load 15 more of 15

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial