Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

13cases from 3 jurisdictions
€242.3mTotal of monetary amounts (10 cases with an amount)
€143.3mLargest single case: Trafigura Beheer B.V.
€276,500Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20221€148,000
20232€560,000
20242€97.6m
20257€143.7m
20261€278,000

13 cases

3 Mar 2026 Killer GmbH & Co KG, Killer GmbHWaste cartel: €278,000 fine on waste firm Killer despite leniency status AustriaCartels and collusion €278,000

The Kartellgericht (Cartel Court) fined Killer GmbH & Co KG and Killer GmbH allegedly 278,000 EUR for taking part in the nationwide waste management cartel from July 2002 to March 2021, mainly in Lower and Upper Austria and occasionally in Tyrol. The participants fixed prices, shared territories and customers and exchanged competitively sensitive information, including in tenders for waste collection. The fine was reduced because of leniency status and the consensual termination of the proceedings.

What organisations can take from it

A leniency application made only after a dawn raid can reduce a fine but will not necessarily waive it; companies should investigate suspicions internally at an early stage.

Relevance to training and awareness

Territorial and customer allocation in regional markets

Authority / court
Oberlandesgericht Wien als Kartellgericht (Antrag der Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
§ 1 Abs. 1 KartG und Art. 101 Abs. 1 AEUV; § 29 Abs. 1 Z 1 lit. a und d KartG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Reduction for cooperation under the leniency programme and the consensual termination of the proceedings.
Published
15 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

18 Dec 2025 Werbendes Unternehmen aus dem Energiesektor (anonymisiert)BNetzA: €210,000 fine on energy company over contracts foisted on consumers by phone GermanyMarketing and consent €210,000

The Bundesnetzagentur (Federal Network Agency) fined an energy company 210,000 EUR for unlawful telephone advertising. Callers often posed as the consumer's energy supplier, and in many cases contracts were foisted on the people called; the company has appealed.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone marketing by phone needs verifiable prior consent and must not pose as the existing supplier of the people called.

Relevance to training and awareness

Consent and proof of consent for telephone marketing

Authority / court
Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA)
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
UWG – Verbot unerlaubter Telefonwerbung gegenüber Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Energy and utilities

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

18 Dec 2025 Werbendes Unternehmen aus dem Sektor Photovoltaik (anonymisiert)BNetzA: €100,500 fine on solar panel seller over disguised sales calls GermanyMarketing and consent €100,500

The Bundesnetzagentur (Federal Network Agency) imposed fines totalling 100,500 EUR on a solar photovoltaic company: 66,000 EUR for unlawful telephone advertising and 34,500 EUR for withholding caller numbers on sales calls. Callers concealed who the calls were really for and in some cases falsely presented sales calls as mere advisory calls.

What organisations can take from it

Even a business that merely commissions sales calls can itself be fined – consent of the people called should be checked before a campaign starts.

Relevance to training and awareness

Consent and proof of consent for telephone marketing

Authority / court
Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA)
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
UWG – Verbot unerlaubter Telefonwerbung gegenüber Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern; Verbot der Rufnummernunterdrückung bei Werbeanrufen
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

21 Nov 2025 Rethmann SE & Co. KG (Rethmann-Gruppe, u. a. Remondis)Bundeskartellamt: Rethmann Group must notify future acquisitions for three years GermanyMerger control Order

Applying Section 32f(2) of the German Competition Act (GWB) for the first time, the Bundeskartellamt (Federal Cartel Office) required Rethmann SE & Co. KG and its affiliated companies (the Rethmann Group, which includes Remondis) to notify for three years before completion even mergers below the general turnover thresholds, where the target generates more than 1 million EUR in domestic turnover and at least 100,000 EUR in the collection of non-hazardous municipal waste or the processing of hollow glass. The decision builds on the findings of the sector inquiry into municipal waste completed at the end of 2023; it was not yet final when announced.

What organisations can take from it

Market leaders in regionally defined markets must expect that even small acquisitions below the turnover thresholds may become notifiable.

Relevance to training and awareness

Merger control obligations for small acquisitions

Authority / court
Bundeskartellamt
Area of law
Competition law · Merger control
Legal basis
§ 32f Abs. 2 GWB (Az. B5-31/24)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Published
24 Nov 2025

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

13 Nov 2025 Werbendes Unternehmen aus dem Energiesektor (anonymisiert)BNetzA: €130,000 fine on energy company over sales calls with withheld numbers GermanyMarketing and consent €130,000

The Bundesnetzagentur (Federal Network Agency) imposed fines totalling 130,000 EUR on an energy company for its sales calls: 105,000 EUR for unlawful telephone advertising to consumers and 25,000 EUR for withholding caller numbers on sales calls. Callers frequently concealed their identity, so that people called were often signed up to contracts they had not wanted; the company has appealed.

What organisations can take from it

Withholding the caller number or disguising one's identity on sales calls risks additional fines on top of the ban on unsolicited calls.

Relevance to training and awareness

Consent and proof of consent for telephone marketing

Authority / court
Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA)
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
UWG – Verbot unerlaubter Telefonwerbung gegenüber Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern; Verbot der Rufnummernunterdrückung bei Werbeanrufen
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Energy and utilities

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

29 Aug 2025 Strom- und Gasversorger mit mindestens 75.000 Kunden (in der amtlichen Mitteilung anonymisiert)Bundesnetzagentur: energy supplier must reverse invalid price increases GermanyConsumer protection and online retail Order

Despite price guarantees it had given, an electricity and gas supplier tried at the end of July 2022 to impose unilateral price increases from 1 September 2022, often raising the unit price by several hundred per cent. The Bundesnetzagentur (Federal Network Agency) found that it had breached the information and transparency duties of Section 41(5) of the Energy Industry Act (EnWG), that the increases were therefore invalid and that from March 2023 it had nonetheless billed customers who had objected at the higher prices; it ordered all adjustments to be withdrawn and reversed within six months and threatened a penalty payment of 100,000 EUR. The Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf) upheld the decision on 13 August 2026 (not final).

What organisations can take from it

Price guarantees apply even in an energy crisis; unilateral price rises need a sound legal basis and simple, understandable customer information.

Relevance to training and awareness

Transparent customer information on price changes

Authority / court
Bundesnetzagentur (Bescheid bestätigt durch OLG Düsseldorf, 5. Kartellsenat, Beschluss vom 13.08.2026)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail
Legal basis
§ 41 Abs. 5 Satz 1 und 3 EnWG; § 40 Abs. 2 Satz 1 Nr. 3 Alt. 2 EnWG; OLG-Az. VI-5 Kart 2/26 [V]
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Energy and utilities
Published
14 Aug 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Mar 2025 Gaslieferant für Haushaltskunden (in der amtlichen Mitteilung anonymisiert)Bundesnetzagentur: conditions for gas supplier after cutting off 350,000 households GermanyConsumer protection and online retail Order

A gas supplier had stopped supplying around 350,000 household customers without notice in December 2021 and terminated the contracts retroactively. When it sought to resume business in 2023, the Bundesnetzagentur (Federal Network Agency) made this subject to conditions because of the management's continuing unreliability: only gradual customer growth until spring 2028, submission of audited annual accounts for 2023 to 2026 and notification of changes to procurement, tariffs and terms until the end of 2027, with penalty payments of up to 100,000 EUR for breaches. The Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf) dismissed the appeal on 23 July 2026; a further appeal on points of law has been allowed.

What organisations can take from it

A supplier that abruptly cuts off household customers must expect years of conditions, as the reliability of its management remains under scrutiny.

Relevance to training and awareness

Supplier obligations towards household customers in energy crises

Authority / court
Bundesnetzagentur (Bescheid bestätigt durch OLG Düsseldorf, 5. Kartellsenat, Beschluss vom 23.07.2026)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail
Legal basis
EnWG – Teiluntersagung der Tätigkeit als Energielieferant wegen Unzuverlässigkeit der Geschäftsleitung (Auflagen mit Zwangsgeldandrohung); OLG-Az. VI-5 Kart 1/26 [V]
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Energy and utilities
Liability of senior managers
The decisive factor was the unreliability of management; according to the court's findings it showed no insight and settled customers' losses only inadequately.
Published
23 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

31 Jan 2025 Trafigura Beheer B.V.Swiss Federal Criminal Court (Bundesstrafgericht) convicts Trafigura of bribery in Angola SwitzerlandBribery of public officials €143.3m

Between 2009 and 2011, more than 4 million EUR and more than 600,000 USD were paid to an official in Angola in order to promote ship chartering and bunkering business of the Trafigura group. The court convicted the then parent company for lacking rules on the supervision of intermediaries, imposing a fine of 3 million CHF and a compensatory claim (Ersatzforderung) of 145,634,268 USD (amount converted at the ECB rate of 31 January 2025: 148,933,982 USD in total). It was the first judgment of the Federal Criminal Court on corporate criminal liability for foreign bribery; it is not final.

What organisations can take from it

In Switzerland, companies are liable if their organisation fails to prevent bribery – and the compensatory claim can exceed the fine many times over.

Relevance to training and awareness

Payments via intermediaries to employees of state-owned oil companies

Authority / court
Bundesstrafgericht (Strafkammer); Anklage durch die Bundesanwaltschaft
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Art. 102 StGB i. V. m. Art. 322septies StGB (Bestechung fremder Amtsträger); SK.2023.49
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
intentional
Published
31 Jan 2025

Original amount 148,933,982 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 31 Jan 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

29 Nov 2024 Saubermacher Dienstleistungs-Aktiengesellschaft, Trüger Recycling- und Transport-GesmbH, pink robin gmbhWaste cartel: €7.085m fine on Saubermacher, Trüger and pink robin AustriaCartels and collusion €7.09m

The Kartellgericht (Cartel Court) fined Saubermacher Dienstleistungs-Aktiengesellschaft, Trüger Recycling- und Transport-GesmbH and pink robin gmbh 7.085 million EUR for taking part in a nationwide cartel in waste collection (July 2002 to March 2021). The participants fixed prices, shared markets and exchanged information on public and private tenders; the three companies' periods of involvement differed in length. Starting from 15.58 million EUR, the Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde (BWB, Federal Competition Authority) granted a reduction for the consensual termination of the proceedings.

What organisations can take from it

Tacitly leaving each other's home territories alone (home-market principle) is a hardcore restriction and is punished like an express agreement.

Relevance to training and awareness

Market sharing and price fixing between competitors

Authority / court
Oberlandesgericht Wien als Kartellgericht (Antrag der Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
§ 1 Abs. 1 KartG und Art. 101 Abs. 1 AEUV; § 29 Z 1 lit. a und d KartG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Energy and utilities
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Reduction for the consensual termination of the proceedings (starting amount 15.58 million EUR).
Published
8 May 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

1 Mar 2024 a Swiss commodities trading houseTrading house convicted: around 86.7 million CHF over corruption in Ecuador's oil business SwitzerlandBribery of public officialsanonymised €90.5m

The Geneva-based commodities trading house failed to take all reasonable organisational precautions to prevent foreign public officials from being bribed on its behalf in connection with the Ecuadorian oil industry from 2013 to 2017. The Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland (BA) – in coordination with US authorities – ordered the trading house to pay around 86.7 million CHF, of which 4.3 million CHF is a fine.

What organisations can take from it

Commodities traders must scrutinise payments to intermediaries in government business without gaps – the confiscation of profits far exceeds the fine.

Relevance to training and awareness

Payments via intermediaries to state-owned oil companies

Authority / court
Bundesanwaltschaft (BA)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Art. 102 StGB (Unternehmensverantwortlichkeit) i. V. m. Bestechung fremder Amtsträger
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Culpability
intentional
Published
1 Mar 2024

Original amount 86,700,000 CHF, converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 Mar 2024.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 1 Mar 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

13 Nov 2023 a German business that commissioned sales calls for energy supplyBNetzA: €285,000 fine on business that commissioned sales calls for energy supply GermanyMarketing and consentanonymised €285,000

The Bundesnetzagentur (Federal Network Agency) fined a business that had commissioned sales calls for energy supply 285,000 EUR for unlawful telephone advertising. Together with the other energy proceedings it contributed to total fines of 1.435 million EUR for unlawful telephone advertising imposed by the agency in 2023.

What organisations can take from it

Even a business that merely commissions sales calls can itself be fined – consent of the people called should be checked before a campaign starts.

Relevance to training and awareness

Consent and proof of consent for telephone marketing

Authority / court
Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA)
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
UWG – Verbot unerlaubter Telefonwerbung gegenüber Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities

Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Version 2 · Company name anonymised since 13 Nov 2025 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

28 Jun 2023 a German business that commissioned sales calls for energy supplyBNetzA: €275,000 fine on business that commissioned sales calls for energy supply GermanyMarketing and consentanonymised €275,000

The Bundesnetzagentur (Federal Network Agency) fined a business that had commissioned sales calls for energy supply 275,000 EUR for unlawful telephone advertising. According to the agency's annual review, callers in the 2023 energy cases frequently pretended to be from the current supplier or a price comparison site.

What organisations can take from it

Even a business that merely commissions sales calls can itself be fined – consent of the people called should be checked before a campaign starts.

Relevance to training and awareness

Consent and proof of consent for telephone marketing

Authority / court
Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA)
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
UWG – Verbot unerlaubter Telefonwerbung gegenüber Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities

Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Version 2 · Company name anonymised since 28 Jun 2025 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

22 Nov 2022 a German business that commissioned sales calls for electricity supply contractsBNetzA: €148,000 fine on business that commissioned unlawful sales calls for electricity contracts GermanyMarketing and consentanonymised €148,000

The Bundesnetzagentur (Federal Network Agency) fined a business that had commissioned sales calls for electricity supply contracts 148,000 EUR for unlawful telephone advertising. The official list gives neither the name nor further details; according to the agency, in 2022 it concentrated its investigations in nine large proceedings covering up to 3,000 complaints each.

What organisations can take from it

Even a business that merely commissions sales calls can itself be fined – consent of the people called should be checked before a campaign starts.

Relevance to training and awareness

Consent and proof of consent for telephone marketing

Authority / court
Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA)
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
UWG – Verbot unerlaubter Telefonwerbung gegenüber Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities

Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Version 2 · Company name anonymised since 22 Nov 2024 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial