Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by regionAll jurisdictions
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
- Bribery and corruption €5.14bn 84 % · 10 cases
- Competition law €951.5m 15 % · 20 cases
- Environment and sustainability €24.3m 0 % · 7 cases
- Sanctions and export control €22.3m 0 % · 3 cases
- Health and safety and employment law €5.75m 0 % · 6 cases
- Consumer protection and online retail €4.18m 0 % · 2 cases
- Capital markets and financial supervision €2.48m 0 % · 4 cases
- Whistleblower protection €210,202 0 % · 1 case
- Supply chain and human rights – 0 % · 1 case
Who?
by company- Purdue Pharma L.P. €4.75bn 77 % · 1 case
- Anonymised companies €546m 9 % · 17 cases
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (Teva-Gruppe) €462.6m 8 % · 1 case
- Gilead Sciences, Inc. €177.8m 3 % · 1 case
- Pfizer Inc. (für die Tochter Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd.) €57.1m 1 % · 1 case
- Novamont S.p.A., Eni S.p.A. €32.1m 1 % · 1 case
- Dompé U.S. Inc. €27.5m 0 % · 1 case
- Vifor Pharma UK Limited u. a. (CSL-Konzern) €27.4m 0 % · 1 case
- The Chemours Company; The Chemours Company FC, LLC €19.8m 0 % · 1 case
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. €11.7m 0 % · 1 case
- 27 more€40.8m
When?
per year, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | €284.7m |
| 2023 | 8 | €226.1m |
| 2024 | 6 | €506.7m |
| 2025 | 18 | €313.4m |
| 2026 | 16 | €4.82bn |
54 cases
10 Sep 2026 Dompé U.S. Inc.Dompé U.S.: 32 million USD – Medicare patients’ co-payments covered via foundations €27.5m
From 2018 to 2021, the pharmaceutical manufacturer allegedly used two patient assistance foundations to fund Medicare beneficiaries’ co-payments for its drug Oxervate in order to promote its sales. Following a self-disclosure, Dompé paid 32 million USD.
Benefits flowing to customers via foundations or other third parties remain benefits provided by the company – donations to patient assistance programmes require strict independence.
Benefits to patients and customers via third parties
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of Justice / U.S. Attorney's Office, District of Massachusetts
- Area of law
- Bribery and corruption · Gifts, hospitality and benefits
- Legal basis
- Anti-Kickback Statute (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b)); False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 ff.)
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Mitigating circumstances
- Self-disclosure.
Original amount 32,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Sep 2026.
- HHS-OIG Enforcement Actions: Dompé U.S. Agrees to Pay $32M to Resolve False Claims Act Liability Relating to Self-Disclosure of Patient Kickbacks (10.09.2026) Enforcement database of an authority
- U.S. Department of Justice: Dompé U.S. Agrees to Pay $32M to Resolve False Claims Act Liability Relating to Self-Disclosure of Patient Kickbacks (10.09.2026) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
25 Aug 2026 ExxonMobil Chemical LimitedExxonMobil Chemical: 267,000 GBP for five hydrocarbon leaks at Fife ethylene plant €312,098
Between February 2018 and September 2019, five leaks of highly flammable hydrocarbons occurred at the Mossmorran major hazard site (COMAH upper tier), all caused by corrosion under insulation; around 82 tonnes escaped in one leak. During a routine inspection in May 2019, inspectors of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) smelled escaping gas – the company had known about this leak for around four months and had continued production without additional precautions. The inspection arrangements for insulated pipework were inadequate; fine of 267,000 GBP.
Recurring damage patterns must change the inspection concept – visual inspections from the ground are not sufficient for insulated pipework.
- Authority / court
- Health and Safety Executive (Kirkcaldy Sheriff Court)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
- Legal basis
- Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998, reg. 6(2); Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, s. 33(1)(c)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 26 Aug 2026
Original amount 267,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 25 Aug 2026.
- Six-figure fine for ExxonMobil after five leaks of extremely flammable hydrocarbons at Fife chemical plant Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
14 Aug 2026 Henkel AG & Co. KGaAHenkel/Liquid Nails: court blocks takeover of Loctite’s main competitor Order
Henkel wanted to buy the construction adhesive brand Liquid Nails for 725 million USD from the financial investor American Industrial Partners, thereby taking over the main competitor of its Loctite brand. After a seven-day trial, the federal court, on application by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), issued a permanent injunction against the acquisition.
Acquiring the closest competitor carries a high risk of prohibition, even at a moderate deal volume.
- Authority / court
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (auf Antrag der FTC)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Merger control
- Legal basis
- Section 7 Clayton Act; Section 13(b) FTC Act (Permanent Injunction)
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 17 Aug 2026
- Statement on FTC Win Blocking Loctite, Liquid Nails Construction Adhesive Merger (17.08.2026) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
10 Aug 2026 Veloxis Pharmaceuticals Inc.Veloxis: over 46 million USD – luxury trips, dinners and gifts for transplant teams Other
From 2016 to 2023, Veloxis provided transplant professionals with expensive meals and alcohol, trips and stays at luxury resorts, gifts and consultancy fees without consideration, and paid specialty pharmacies concealed remuneration in order to promote prescriptions and purchases of the immunosuppressant Envarsus XR. The company entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement with a criminal payment of more than 10 million USD, is paying 34.45 million USD under civil law (21,211,251 USD to the federal government, 13,238,749 USD to states) and a penalty of 1.55 million USD under the Sunshine Act (Open Payments) – the highest to date – totalling over 46 million USD.
Invitations and gifts to decision-makers must not only be limited but also fully reported to transparency registers.
Gifts, travel and hospitality for healthcare professionals; transparency reporting
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of Justice / U.S. Attorney's Office, District of Massachusetts
- Area of law
- Bribery and corruption · Gifts, hospitality and benefits
- Legal basis
- Anti-Kickback Statute; False Claims Act; Physician Payments Sunshine Act (Open Payments)
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- DOJ: Veloxis Pharmaceuticals Agrees to Pay Over $46M to Resolve Criminal and Civil Liability for Kickback Schemes (10.08.2026) Press release of an authority
- HHS-OIG Enforcement Actions: Veloxis Pharmaceuticals Agrees to Pay Over $46M … (10.08.2026) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
3 Aug 2026 Guangxi Kelun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.UFLPA list: antibiotics manufacturer Guangxi Kelun Pharmaceutical added Order
The U.S. Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force (FLETF) listed the manufacturer of cephalosporin antibiotics because it sources antibiotic intermediates from Yili Chuanning Biotechnology in Xinjiang. The company's goods are therefore presumed to have been produced with forced labour on import into the US unless the importer rebuts this.
Pharmaceutical companies must be able to trace their supply chains back to active ingredient intermediates.
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force)
- Area of law
- Supply chain and human rights · Forced and child labour
- Legal basis
- Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, Section 2(d)(2)(B)(v)
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Published
- 3 Aug 2026
- Federal Register: Notice Regarding the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act Entity List (03.08.2026) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
20 Jul 2026 EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc.EyePoint: 4.66 million USD – kickbacks to surgery centres for purchasing an eye medicine €4.08m
Between January 2019 and March 2023, the pharmaceutical manufacturer allegedly paid kickbacks to ambulatory surgery centres to induce them to purchase and use the injectable drug DEXYCU for cataract surgery. To resolve the False Claims Act allegations, EyePoint paid 4,657,463.18 USD and entered into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with HHS-OIG.
Discounts, payments or services to institutions that make purchasing decisions require a documented consideration at market value.
Granting benefits to customers and purchasing decision-makers
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of Justice
- Area of law
- Bribery and corruption · Commercial bribery
- Legal basis
- Anti-Kickback Statute (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b)); False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 ff.)
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Original amount 4,657,463.18 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 20 Jul 2026.
- HHS-OIG Enforcement Actions: EyePoint Pharmaceuticals to Pay $4.6 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations (20.07.2026) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
24 Jun 2026 The Chemours Company; The Chemours Company FC, LLCChemours: USD 22.5m civil penalty in PFAS settlement with EPA and West Virginia €19.8m
The EPA, the US Department of Justice and West Virginia's environmental agency reached a settlement (consent decree) with Chemours over PFAS discharges into the Cape Fear, Delaware and Ohio rivers, some made without and some in breach of discharge permits, together with TSCA and RCRA violations at four plants. Chemours will pay a civil penalty of 22,500,000 USD in three annual instalments of 7,500,000 USD and carry out remedial measures, including drinking water supply, PFAS controls and a USD 90m mitigation programme, which the EPA puts at over USD 450m in total. The settlement was lodged with the court on 24 June 2026 and is subject to public comment and court approval. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment. The decision is not final.
PFAS manufacturers must continuously check every discharge against their permits – unregulated flows lead to penalties and costly obligations towards local residents.
Discharge permits and PFAS emissions
- Authority / court
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) / U.S. Department of Justice mit West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Clean Water Act (NPDES); Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; Toxic Substances Control Act; West Virginia Water Pollution Control Act
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- not yet final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Mitigating circumstances
- The civil penalty was set on the basis of the company's ability to pay.
- Published
- 24 Jun 2026
Original amount 22,500,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Jun 2026.
- EPA: Chemours Settlement Summary - June 2026 Press release of an authority
- EPA News Release, 24.06.2026: EPA Obtains Over $450 Million In Penalties and Relief in Agreement with Chemours Press release of an authority
- Proposed Consent Decree, United States and West Virginia v. The Chemours Company, Civil Action 2:26-cv-00418 (S.D. W. Va.), lodged 24.06.2026 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
23 Jun 2026 Denka Performance Elastomer, LLCDenka Performance Elastomer: USD 996,703 over hazardous waste at neoprene plant €874,915
The EPA (Region 6) issued a Consent Agreement and Final Order against Denka Performance Elastomer over RCRA violations at its neoprene plant in LaPlace (Louisiana): missing waste determinations, breaches of land disposal restrictions and treatment and storage of hazardous waste without a permit. Denka will pay 996,703.35 USD and must clean out a brine pit and its ancillary equipment; if the currently idle plant resumes operations, further requirements apply, including on waste inventory, containers, training and protective equipment. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment.
Every waste stream needs a documented determination of whether it is hazardous – without it there is no basis for lawful storage, treatment and disposal.
Classification and storage of hazardous waste
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 6
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Waste and hazardous substances
- Legal basis
- Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Docket RCRA-06-2025-0910
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Repeat case
- yes
- Published
- 2 Jul 2026
Original amount 996,703.35 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Jun 2026.
- EPA: Denka Performance Elastomer RCRA Settlement Summary Press release of an authority
- EPA Region 6: Consent Agreement and Final Order, Denka Performance Elastomer LLC, Docket No. RCRA-06-2025-0910 Decision of an authority
- EPA News Release, 02.07.2026: EPA Final Settlement with Denka Performance Elastomer Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
14 May 2026 Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.Takeda: 13.7 million USD – speaker fees and luxury meals for prescribing physicians €11.7m
From 2014 to 2020, Takeda allegedly selected physicians specifically for its speaker programme for the antidepressant Trintellix and provided them with fees and meals at expensive restaurants to promote prescriptions; some participants attended the same event several times without any educational benefit. Takeda paid 13,670,921 USD.
Speaker programmes need a demonstrable educational purpose – repeated attendance and expensive hospitality turn them into inducements.
Invitations, hospitality and fees for healthcare professionals
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of Justice / U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of California
- Area of law
- Bribery and corruption · Gifts, hospitality and benefits
- Legal basis
- Anti-Kickback Statute (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b)); False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 ff.)
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
Original amount 13,670,921 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 14 May 2026.
- DOJ: Takeda Agrees to Pay $13.6M to Resolve False Claims Allegations Relating to Improper Payments (14.05.2026) Press release of an authority
- HHS-OIG Enforcement Actions: Takeda Agrees to Pay $13.6M … Improper Payments to Physicians (14.05.2026) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
13 May 2026 NaphtachimieMarseille: environmental CJIP with Naphtachimie for €1.2m after oil leaks at Lavéra €1.2m
Pyrolysis oil leaked twice at the Lavéra petrochemical site in Martigues: around 50 tonnes in July 2018 through a failed seal into the Anse d'Auguette, part of which reached the sea, and around one tonne in April 2022 through a corroded seawater pipe, of which some 500 kg reached the Anse d'Auguette. Naphtachimie therefore concluded an environmental CJIP (convention judiciaire d'intérêt public, French deferred prosecution agreement) with the Marseille public prosecutor; it pays a public interest fine of 1,200,000 EUR, compensates two environmental associations and will trial, at its own expense, a biological clean-up of the Anse d'Auguette; validated on 13 May 2026.
Seals and pipes at plants handling substances hazardous to water must be inspected proactively; leaks lead to fines and remediation duties.
Maintenance and leak prevention at industrial sites near water
- Authority / court
- Parquet de Marseille (Procureur de la République); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Art. 41-1-3 Code de procédure pénale (pollution des eaux)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Published
- 26 May 2026
- Communiqué de presse du parquet de Marseille, 26 mai 2026 (CJIP-E Naphtachimie) Press release of an authority
- Ministère de la Justice: Liste der Conventions judiciaires d'intérêt public Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
28 Apr 2026 Purdue Pharma L.P.Purdue Pharma: 5.544 billion USD penalty – including kickbacks via the speaker programme €4.75bn
Following its 2020 guilty plea, the opioid manufacturer was sentenced in Newark to a criminal fine of 3.544 billion USD (asserted in the insolvency proceedings) and forfeiture of 2 billion USD; up to 1.775 billion USD can be credited against the forfeiture if Purdue emerges from insolvency as a public benefit company. Purdue had deceived the DEA and paid kickbacks to prescribers via its speaker programme and to an electronic health records platform in order to increase opioid prescriptions.
Fee programmes for customers who drive revenue can become part of a criminal overall scheme – with consequences that threaten the company’s existence.
Speaker fees and benefits for prescribing physicians
- Authority / court
- U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey (Anklage: U.S. Department of Justice)
- Area of law
- Bribery and corruption · Gifts, hospitality and benefits
- Legal basis
- Verschwörung zum Betrug der USA und zur Verletzung des Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; zwei Fälle Verschwörung zur Verletzung des Anti-Kickback Statute (Schuldbekenntnis vom 24.11.2020)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Culpability
- intentional
Original amount 5,544,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Apr 2026.
- HHS-OIG Enforcement Actions: Opioid Manufacturer Purdue Pharma Sentenced for Fraud and Kickback Conspiracies (28.04.2026) Enforcement database of an authority
- U.S. Department of Justice: Opioid Manufacturer Purdue Pharma Sentenced for Fraud and Kickback Conspiracies (28.04.2026) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
21 Apr 2026 Industrial Chemicals LimitedIndustrial Chemicals: 3.8 million GBP after caustic soda burns – one leg amputated €4.37m
In 2019, an employee stepped into a puddle of caustic soda; his safety boots offered no protection, and his leg had to be amputated below the knee. In 2022, another worker suffered chemical burns during manual decanting. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found leaking pipes and valves, a lack of maintenance, no risk assessment for decanting and untested safety footwear; fine of 3.8 million GBP plus 124,748 GBP in costs. According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2024, the company had around 469 employees.
Leaks of hazardous substances are not a normal state of affairs – maintenance, spill management and tested protective equipment go hand in hand.
Handling corrosive hazardous substances and PPE
- Authority / court
- Health and Safety Executive (Southwark Crown Court)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
- Legal basis
- Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002, reg. 7(1)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Employees
- 250 to 999
- Published
- 24 Apr 2026
Original amount 3,800,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 21 Apr 2026.
- Chemical company fined £3.8 million after investigation into serious chemical burns suffered by two employees Press release of an authority
- Companies House: Registereintrag Industrial Chemicals Limited (03886037) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link
Report an error
28 Jan 2026 Syngenta LtdSyngenta: 400,000 GBP after uncontrolled release of high-pressure steam during maintenance €460,564
While flange bolts were being removed from a steam trap in November 2023, a corroded isolation valve failed and high-pressure steam escaped; the contractor's fitter narrowly escaped serious injury. The agrochemicals group had not maintained work equipment and had not assessed the risk despite known corrosion (only single instead of double isolation). The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) prosecution resulted in a fine of 400,000 GBP plus 8,288 GBP in costs.
Known corrosion requires safer isolation procedures – routine tasks must not mask risks.
Isolation and shut-off during maintenance
- Authority / court
- Health and Safety Executive (Leeds Magistrates' Court)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
- Legal basis
- Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998, reg. 5(1); Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, reg. 3(1)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 28 Jan 2026
Original amount 400,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Jan 2026.
- Major chemical firm hit with £400,000 fine after dangerous steam release Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
13 Jan 2026 Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd.Estee Lauder Cosmetics: 750,000 CAD fine for unreported PFAS in eyeliners €463,765
A routine inspection in 2023 found that the company was selling eyeliners containing the PFAS substance perfluorononyl dimethicone without submitting the required notification of a ‘significant new activity’; a subsequent compliance order was not complied with. The court imposed 750,000 CAD; the company must inform its shareholders and is listed in the Environmental Offenders Registry.
Product development and regulatory affairs must check new substances for notification requirements before market launch; regulatory orders must be implemented within the deadline.
Chemical notification and approval obligations for product launches
- Authority / court
- Ontario Court of Justice (Ermittlungen: Environment and Climate Change Canada)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Waste and hazardous substances
- Legal basis
- Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (Significant New Activity, Compliance Order)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Published
- 2 Feb 2026
Original amount 750,000 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 13 Jan 2026.
- Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. fined $750,000 for violating the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
7 Jan 2026 Superior General Partner Inc.Superior General Partner: 1.35 million CAD fine for sodium chlorite in river and late reporting €836,690
In 2019, as a result of an equipment defect, sodium chlorite entered the Rivière du Lièvre twelve times from the ERCO Mondial chemical plant in Gatineau; in the last incident, the authorities were only informed after five days. The company was fined 1.35 million CAD.
Reporting obligations for releases of substances apply immediately; those who wait for days incur additional liability.
Immediate reporting of environmental incidents to the authorities
- Authority / court
- Court of Québec (Ermittlungen: Environment and Climate Change Canada)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Waste and hazardous substances
- Legal basis
- Fisheries Act (Einbringen schädlicher Stoffe; unterlassene sofortige Meldung)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Published
- 8 Jan 2026
Original amount 1,350,000 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 Jan 2026.
- Superior General Partner Inc. and one individual fined a total of $1,365,000 for violating the Fisheries Act Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link
Report an error
6 Jan 2026 Futamura Chemical UK LtdHydrogen sulphide in drainage system: film manufacturer pays 200,000 GBP after death €230,867
At the Wigton plant in 2021 an employee collapsed in a pump room after exposure to gas and died; a delivery driver who tried to help also lost consciousness. According to the investigation, the cellulose film manufacturer had not assessed that hydrogen sulphide from the production process could enter the drainage system and be released there; fine of 200,000 GBP plus 20,000 GBP in costs. According to its 2025 annual accounts, the company had an average of 283 employees.
Cover all exposure pathways in risk assessments for hazardous substances – including effluent and drainage systems.
- Authority / court
- Warrington Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
- Legal basis
- Section 2(1) und 3(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Employees
- 250 to 999
- Published
- 8 Jan 2026
Original amount 200,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 6 Jan 2026.
- Cellulose film packaging company fined after workers exposed to harmful gas (HSE) Press release of an authority
- Companies House: Registereintrag Futamura Chemical UK Limited (10042418) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link
Report an error
28 Oct 2025 ExxonMobil Chemical LimitedExxonMobil Chemical: 176,000 GBP fine for six days of continuous flaring in Fife €200,913
Following a loss of steam in April 2019, the ethylene plant in Fife flared for almost a week; the smoke significantly exceeded permit limits, and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) received over 900 complaints. Existing procedures and emergency plans should have prevented the incident but were not adequately followed. The company pleaded guilty and was fined 176,000 GBP.
Emergency plans only protect if staff apply them consistently in an emergency – regular drills are part of permit compliance.
Compliance with operating and emergency procedures in industrial plants
- Authority / court
- Kirkcaldy Sheriff Court (Ermittlungen: Scottish Environment Protection Agency, SEPA)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Regulation 67(1)(b) Pollution Prevention and Control (Scotland) Regulations 2012; Section 2 Pollution Prevention and Control Act 1999
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Culpability
- negligent
- Published
- 28 Oct 2025
Original amount 176,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Oct 2025.
- ExxonMobil Chemical Limited fined £176,000 for six days of flaring that sounded like a jet engine Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
10 Sep 2025 Colorcon LimitedPharmaceutical supplier Colorcon paid Moscow salaries via sanctioned banks €176,590
In 2022, the Moscow office of the British subsidiary made payments – mainly salaries – to accounts at Alfa-Bank, Promsvyazbank, Sberbank and VTB; after deduction of payments covered by a general licence, around 128,300 GBP remained in breach. The approval process in the UK checked only the amount and the recipient, not the bank; because of a four-month delay in reporting, HM Treasury's Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) granted only a 35% instead of a 50% reduction. According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2025, the company had around 280 employees.
Anyone approving payments must also screen the recipient's bank against sanctions lists – and report breaches discovered without delay.
Payment approval with screening of the recipient bank, prompt reporting
- Authority / court
- HM Treasury, Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
- Legal basis
- Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, reg. 12
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Employees
- 250 to 999
- Mitigating circumstances
- Disclosure and full cooperation, but delayed
- Published
- 30 Sep 2025
Original amount 152,750 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Sep 2025.
- OFSI: Imposition of Monetary Penalty – Colorcon Limited Decision of an authority
- OFSI – Enforcement of financial sanctions (Sammlung) Enforcement database of an authority
- Companies House: Registereintrag Colorcon Limited (00999077) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link
Report an error
1 Aug 2025 P&G Japan G.K. (P&Gジャパン合同会社)P&G Japan: order over unsubstantiated anti-mould claims for a Febreze product Order
P&G Japan advertised its 'Febreze bathroom anti-mould' product (ファブリーズ お風呂用防カビ剤), among other things on the packaging from April 2022 to May 2023, by claiming that simply placing it in the bathroom would prevent black mould for around six weeks. The documents submitted did not substantiate this effect, so the advertising was deemed misleading; the order required a corrective notice, measures to prevent recurrence and cessation.
Anyone promising an effect must hold robust evidence before advertising; without it, the claim is deemed misleading.
Substantiating efficacy claims in advertising
- Authority / court
- Consumer Affairs Agency (消費者庁, CAA)
- Area of law
- Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
- Legal basis
- Art. 7 Abs. 1 und 2 i. V. m. Art. 5 Nr. 1 Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations (不当景品類及び不当表示防止法, Gesetz Nr. 134/1962)
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Published
- 1 Aug 2025
- P&Gジャパン合同会社に対する景品表示法に基づく措置命令について (Eintrag, 01.08.2025) Press release of an authority
- News Release 01.08.2025 mit Maßnahmenanordnung 消表対第1255号 (PDF) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
25 Jul 2025 Tamro Eesti OÜTamro Eesti: order against unfair payment terms for food supplements Order
In consignment agreements, the pharmaceutical wholesaler had made payment to suppliers of food supplements dependent on subsequent resale (payment period over 30 days) and had reserved the right to hold suppliers liable for spoiled goods. The Konkurentsiamet (Estonian Competition Authority) found infringements of the act on unfair trading practices in the food supply chain and ordered amended contractual terms.
Purchasing terms in the food sector – including for food supplements – must comply with the 30-day payment period and the prohibition on shifting risk.
- Authority / court
- Konkurentsiamet (Estnische Wettbewerbsbehörde)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Abuse of market power
- Legal basis
- § 4 Abs. 1 und 2, § 5 Abs. 2, § 7 Abs. 1 PTEKS (UTP-Richtlinie (EU) 2019/633)
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Ettekirjutus Tamro Eesti OÜ-le ebaausate kaubandustavade kasutamise lõpetamiseks nr 11-4/2025-001, 25.07.2025 Decision of an authority
- Konkurentsiamet – Ausad kaubandustavad: juhtumid Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
4 Jul 2025 Alchem International Pvt. Ltd. und Alchem International (H.K.) LimitedAlchem: €489,000 fine for taking part in the SNBB pharmaceutical ingredient cartel €489,000
According to the European Commission's findings, Alchem took part from 1 November 2005 to 12 February 2018 in an EEA-wide cartel concerning the active ingredient N-butylbromide scopolamine (SNBB), involving minimum prices, quotas and exchanges of sensitive information. Unlike the other participants, who were subject to a settlement decision in October 2023, Alchem declined to settle and received a fine of 489,000 EUR without any reduction.
Suppliers of active pharmaceutical ingredients are also subject to the cartel prohibition; those who do not cooperate forgo reductions.
Price-fixing and quota agreements between competitors
- Authority / court
- Europäische Kommission
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Art. 101 AEUV; Art. 53 EWR-Abkommen
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Published
- 4 Jul 2025
- Commission fines Alchem for participating in a pharmaceutical cartel (IP/25/1721) Press release of an authority
- Presscorner-Schnittstelle, Volltext IP/25/1721 Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
24 Jun 2025 Grifols, S.A.CNMV: €1m fine on Grifols for flawed financial reports and performance measures €1m
The Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV, Spanish securities market supervisor) imposed two fines totalling 1,000,000 EUR on Grifols: 800,000 EUR because the consolidated financial statements for 2021 to 2023 and the 2023 half-year report contained inaccurate or incomplete information under IFRS, and 200,000 EUR for misleading information on the calculation of alternative performance measures (APMs) in the management reports. The company waived administrative appeals.
Alternative performance measures must be calculated transparently and traceably; the issuer is liable for incorrect financial information.
Accuracy of financial reports and alternative performance measures
- Authority / court
- Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV)
- Area of law
- Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
- Legal basis
- Art. 282.1.b) und Art. 292.1.f) Ley 6/2023 de los Mercados de Valores y de los Servicios de Inversión
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Liability of senior managers
- Measures against individuals are not reported here.
- Published
- 6 Aug 2025
- BOE-A-2025-16320: Resolución de 24 de julio de 2025 de la CNMV (Grifols, SA) Official register or notice
- CNMV, Registro público de sanciones impuestas por la CNMV Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
16 Jun 2025 Unicat Catalyst Technologies, LLCCatalyst manufacturer Unicat supplied Iran and blocked Venezuelan company €3.35m
In 2016–2021, the Texas supplier of catalysts for refineries and steelworks supplied products and advice to customers in Iran via employees and agents, and sold goods to a blocked Venezuelan company. The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) considered it an egregious but voluntarily self-disclosed case; there were parallel settlements with the DOJ and BIS, which were taken into account in determining the amount.
When senior management itself steers embargo business, only independent controls and whistleblower channels help – voluntary self-disclosure after discovery reduces the penalty but does not prevent it.
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
- Legal basis
- Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations; Venezuela Sanctions Regulations; IEEPA
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Culpability
- intentional
- Mitigating circumstances
- Voluntary self-disclosure, cooperation and remedial measures after discovery
- Liability of senior managers
- Measures against individuals are not reported here.
- Published
- 16 Jun 2025
Original amount 3,882,797 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Jun 2025.
- OFAC Enforcement Release: Unicat Catalyst Technologies, LLC Settles with OFAC for $3,882,797 (16.06.2025) Decision of an authority
- OFAC – 2025 Enforcement Information Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link
Report an error
10 Jun 2025 Novamont S.p.A., Eni S.p.A.AGCM fines Novamont and Eni €32.1m over exclusivity ties in bioplastics €32.1m
According to the AGCM, from at least January 2018 to December 2023 Novamont tied film producers to its bioplastic Mater-Bi through exclusive or semi-exclusive purchasing obligations and tied retail chains to carrier bags made by its licensees, thereby excluding competitors in bio-compounds for lightweight and very lightweight plastic carrier bags (Art. 102 TFEU). Novamont must pay 30,359,000 EUR (capped at the 10% turnover limit); for the period after its acquisition by the Eni group on 18 October 2023, Novamont and Eni are jointly and severally liable for a further 1,701,052.08 EUR, a total of 32,060,052.08 EUR.
A compliance programme must address the specific competition risks of the business, such as exclusivity clauses used by a strong supplier, or it will not reduce the fine.
Exclusivity clauses of dominant suppliers and effective compliance programmes
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Abuse of market power
- Legal basis
- Art. 102 AEUV; Art. 15 Legge n. 287/1990
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Mitigating circumstances
- None recognised: the compliance programme of the Eni group, which Novamont joined in October 2023, had not worked effectively because training and controls covered other topics and exclusive contracts continued to be concluded; the AGCM considered Novamont's earlier programme manifestly inadequate, partly because its competition law manual did not specifically address exclusive purchasing obligations among the forms of abuse.
- Published
- 24 Jun 2025
- AGCM, Provvedimento A573 (Adunanza 10.06.2025), Chiusura istruttoria e sanzioni Decision of an authority
- AGCM, Comunicato stampa 24.06.2025: A573 – sanzioni complessivamente pari a oltre 32 milioni di euro a Novamont e alla controllante Eni Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
23 May 2025 Vifor Pharma UK Limited u. a. (CSL-Konzern)CMA: Vifor pays GBP 23m to the NHS after suspected disparagement of a rival €27.4m
The CMA had investigated whether, between 2010 and 2024, Vifor abused a suspected dominant position in high-dose intravenous iron by spreading potentially misleading claims about the safety of the rival product Monofer compared with its own Ferinject. It accepted binding commitments: a voluntary payment of GBP 23m to the NHS, a corrective communication campaign aimed at healthcare professionals and additional compliance measures; no infringement was found.
Safety claims about competing products made to healthcare professionals must be substantiated and balanced – disparagement can be pursued as an abuse of market power.
Claims about competitor products in pharmaceutical marketing
- Authority / court
- Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Abuse of market power
- Legal basis
- Chapter II prohibition, section 18(1) Competition Act 1998 (Verdacht); Verpflichtungszusagen nach section 31A Competition Act 1998
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Published
- 23 May 2025
Original amount 23,000,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 May 2025.
- CMA case page: Investigation into suspected anti-competitive conduct by Vifor Pharma in relation to intravenous iron treatments Enforcement database of an authority
- CMA: Decision to accept commitments offered by Vifor in relation to the supply of high-dose intravenous iron, Case 51377 (23 May 2025) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
28 Apr 2025 Gilead Sciences, Inc.Gilead: 202 million USD – speaker programmes with fees, luxury meals and travel €177.8m
Gilead paid physicians who spoke at or attended events on its HIV medicines fees, meals and travel expenses to promote prescriptions; high prescribers received hundreds of thousands of dollars, and events took place at luxury restaurants. The court-approved settlement of 202 million USD contains extensive admissions of fact.
Selecting speakers by prescription volume turns continuing education into bribery – selection criteria and hospitality limits must be documented.
Fees and hospitality at professional events
- Authority / court
- U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York; U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
- Area of law
- Bribery and corruption · Gifts, hospitality and benefits
- Legal basis
- Anti-Kickback Statute (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b)); False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 ff.)
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 29 Apr 2025
Original amount 202,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Apr 2025.
- HHS-OIG Enforcement Actions: U.S. Attorney Announces $202 Million Settlement With Gilead Sciences … Speaker Programs (29.04.2025) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
28 Apr 2025 Bayer S.A.Bayer pays 5 million BRL in CADE settlement over information exchange among employers €773,398
Bayer S.A. concluded a settlement (Termo de Compromisso de Cessação) with the Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE, Brazilian competition authority) in proceedings concerning the exchange of competitively sensitive information between employers in the consumer goods sector with possible effects on the Brazilian labour market. The company admitted its participation, undertook to cease the conduct and to cooperate with the investigation, and allegedly pays 5,003,188.80 BRL to the Fund for Diffuse Rights (FDD). In the same proceedings, 3M do Brasil concluded a separate settlement of allegedly 4,454,414.82 BRL. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.
Exchanging sensitive HR and labour market information between competing employers also carries competition law risk.
Competition law in HR: information exchange between employers
- Authority / court
- Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Lei nº 12.529/2011 (Lei de Defesa da Concorrência), Termo de Compromisso de Cessação
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 6 May 2025
Original amount 5,003,188.8 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Apr 2025.
- CADE – Cade celebra seis acordos em investigações de condutas anticompetitivas (06.05.2025) Press release of an authority
- Diário Oficial da União, 06.05.2025 – CADE Ata nº 8/2025 (Circuito Deliberativo Virtual), Processo nº 08700.007344/2024-40 (Bayer S.A.) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
24 Apr 2025 Johnson & Johnson Consumer NV; Boehringer Ingelheim SComm; Haleon Belgium NVJohnson & Johnson, Boehringer, Haleon: 11.2 million EUR for shelf-placement collusion in pharmacies €11.2m
Over more than 15 years, the three OTC medicine manufacturers jointly developed the category management project ‘SMAN’, through which they steered the placement of non-prescription medicines in selected pharmacies in their favour and disadvantaged or excluded competing products. In a settlement procedure, the Autorité belge de la Concurrence / Belgische Mededingingsautoriteit (Belgian Competition Authority, BMA) imposed a total of 11,249,280.48 EUR.
Category management agreements with retailers must not push competitors off the shelf – joint planograms with competitors are off limits.
Competition law limits of category management
- Authority / court
- Autorité belge de la Concurrence / Belgische Mededingingsautoriteit (BMA)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Code de droit économique Art. IV.1; AEUV Art. 101
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 24 Apr 2025
- BMA – Communiqué de presse N°16/2025 (24.04.2025) Press release of an authority
- BMA – Beslissing BMA-2025-RPR-13-AUD (SMAN), publieke versie Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
10 Apr 2025 Boehringer Ingelheim, Alkaloids of Australia, C2 PHARMA u. a. (7 Unternehmen)WEKO sanctions active-ingredient cartel over butylscopolamine bromide at around CHF 600,000 €645,231
Between 2005 and 2019 Boehringer Ingelheim, Alkaloids of Australia, Alkaloids Corporation, Alchem, C2 PHARMA, Linnea and Transo-Pharm set minimum selling prices for the active ingredient butylscopolamine bromide (SNBB), allocated quotas and exchanged sensitive business information. The Wettbewerbskommission (WEKO, Swiss Competition Commission) closed the case with amicable settlements; sanctions total around CHF 600,000, with C2 PHARMA as the self-reporting party exempted in full and Transo-Pharm and Linnea in part. It is the first cartel concerning a pharmaceutical active ingredient that WEKO has sanctioned.
Even small niche markets for intermediate products are watched by competition authorities, and the first to report can escape the sanction entirely.
Cartel risks for intermediate products and active ingredients; leniency programme
- Authority / court
- Wettbewerbskommission (WEKO)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Kartellgesetz (KG): Preis- und Mengenabrede, einvernehmliche Regelungen, Bonusregelung
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Mitigating circumstances
- Amicable settlements; full immunity for C2 PHARMA (leniency programme), partial reduction for Transo-Pharm and Linnea.
- Published
- 10 Apr 2025
Original amount 600,000 CHF, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Apr 2025.
- WEKO-Medienmitteilung vom 10.04.2025: WEKO sanktioniert Abrede über pharmazeutischen Wirkstoff Press release of an authority
- Newsroom-Schnittstelle der Bundesverwaltung: Volltext der WEKO-Medienmitteilung vom 10.04.2025 (onsb_de_105610) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
8 Apr 2025 Pailpac (Pty) LtdAlleged abuse of dominance: Pailpac allegedly pays ZAR 5m and ends exclusive contracts €236,068
On 8 April 2025 the Competition Tribunal (South Africa's competition adjudicator) confirmed a settlement with Pailpac (Pty) Ltd, a maker of injection-moulded plastic pails for the paints and coatings industry. The Competition Commission (competition authority) alleged that, as the dominant supplier of containers for water-based coatings, the company had tied major customers through exclusive or near-exclusive supply agreements and used below-cost pricing; Pailpac disputes this. It nevertheless allegedly pays an administrative penalty of 5,000,000 ZAR, releases customers from exclusivity and automatic renewal clauses, will buy packaging waste from small businesses and informal waste collectors for five years and will introduce a compliance programme.
Suppliers with strong market positions should have exclusivity and automatic renewal clauses checked under competition law before tying major customers to them.
Exclusive contracts and below-cost pricing by dominant firms
- Authority / court
- Competition Tribunal of South Africa (auf Antrag der Competition Commission)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Abuse of market power
- Legal basis
- Section 8(1)(d)(i) und 8(1)(c) Competition Act 89 of 1998 (Vorwurf der Competition Commission, ohne Anerkenntnis)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Published
- 9 Apr 2025
Original amount 5,000,000 ZAR, converted at the ECB reference rate of 8 Apr 2025.
- Competition Tribunal: Tribunal confirms Pailpac consent agreement: R5 million administrative penalty and an end to exclusive supply arrangements (09.04.2025) Court press release
- Competition Tribunal case file CR055Jun24/SA142Dec24 (Outcome: Confirmed, Order date 2025-04-08) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
18 Mar 2025 Ballance Agri-Nutrients LimitedBallance Agri-Nutrients: 420,000 NZD after a fatal conveyor belt accident €223,678
At the Mount Maunganui fertiliser plant in July 2023, a worker cleaning the conveyor system fell onto a moving belt, was dragged under the frame of another conveyor and died. There was no effective, trained and monitored safe system of work for cleaning and maintenance, and no effective guarding or emergency stop devices. On 18 March 2025 the Tauranga District Court imposed a fine of 420,000 NZD (starting point 700,000 NZD, 40% discounts) and made no reparation order because the family had already received 287,202.86 NZD (77,000 NZD directly from the company and 210,202.86 NZD from a group life insurance policy held by the company).
Cleaning and maintenance on conveyors only with the system made safe, with guarding, a reachable emergency stop and a trained, supervised safe system of work.
Safe cleaning and maintenance on conveyor belts
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Tauranga District Court (Anklage: WorkSafe New Zealand)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
- Legal basis
- Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, ss 36(1)(a), 48(1), 48(2)(c) ([2025] NZDC 5282)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Mitigating circumstances
- Guilty plea, remorse, cooperation and reparation, with discounts totalling 40%; payments to the family totalling 287,202.86 NZD, of which 77,000 NZD was paid directly and 210,202.86 NZD came from the company's group life insurance policy.
Original amount 420,000 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 Mar 2025.
- WorkSafe New Zealand, Court summaries: Ballance Agri-Nutrients Limited Enforcement database of an authority
- WorkSafe New Zealand v Ballance Agri-Nutrients Limited [2025] NZDC 5282, Reserved decision (18.03.2025) Court decision
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
24 Jan 2025 Pfizer Inc. (für die Tochter Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd.)Pfizer/Biohaven: USD 59.7m over speaker fees and lavish meals for doctors €57.1m
Pfizer pays USD 59,746,277 on behalf of its subsidiary Biohaven to resolve False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Statute allegations relating to the period before the acquisition; about USD 50.2 million goes to the federal government and about USD 9.5 million to state Medicaid programmes. From March 2020 to September 2022 Biohaven allegedly gave selected doctors speaker fees and meals at expensive restaurants to encourage prescriptions of the migraine drug Nurtec ODT; some events were attended repeatedly by the same doctors or by spouses, relatives and practice colleagues with no educational need.
In acquisitions, the target's speaker programmes and payments to doctors belong in due diligence – the liability passes to the buyer.
Speaker programmes: selection of speakers, repeat attendance, hospitality
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of Justice (Civil Division; USAO Western District of New York)
- Area of law
- Bribery and corruption · Gifts, hospitality and benefits
- Legal basis
- False Claims Act; Anti-Kickback Statute
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 24 Jan 2025
Original amount 59,746,277 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Jan 2025.
- Pfizer Agrees to Pay Nearly 60M to Resolve False Claims Allegations Relating to Improper Physician Payments by Subsidiary (DOJ, 24.01.2025) Press release of an authority
- Pfizer agrees to pay nearly $60 million to resolve false claims allegations (USAO W.D.N.Y., 24.01.2025) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
20 Jan 2025 Pharnext SAPharnext: FDA setbacks disclosed late and glossed over €500,000
The biotech company did not disclose as soon as possible the FDA's request for an additional study on PXT-3003 and the subsequent rejection of an SPA application, and disseminated misleading communications to shareholders. Sanction imposed on Pharnext: 500,000 EUR.
Negative feedback from regulatory authorities is regularly inside information and must not be given a positive spin in letters to shareholders.
- Authority / court
- Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), Commission des sanctions
- Area of law
- Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
- Legal basis
- Art. 17 MAR; Art. 12 Abs. 1 lit. c und Art. 15 MAR
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Liability of senior managers
- Measures against individuals are not reported here.
- Décision SAN-2025-01 Decision of an authority
- Décision n° 1 du 20 janvier 2025 (PDF) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link
Report an error
14 Jan 2025 AFCO (Tochtergesellschaft der Zep Inc.)Zep subsidiary AFCO: $161,310 proposed after nitrogen dioxide release €157,452
In July 2024, nitrogen dioxide above the exposure limit was released during chemical processing at the plant of Zep subsidiary AFCO in Chambersburg (Pennsylvania); twelve employees were examined in hospital and two were admitted. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) criticised the lack of an emergency action plan, deficient respiratory protection and hazard communication programmes and a delayed evacuation, and proposed $161,310 (including one repeat violation).
In the event of a chemical release, a rehearsed emergency and evacuation plan determines how many employees come to harm.
Responding to gas releases and evacuation
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
- Area of law
- Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
- Legal basis
- 29 CFR 1910.120, 1910.134, 1910.1200
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Repeat case
- yes
- Published
- 14 Jan 2025
Original amount 161,310 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 14 Jan 2025.
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
11 Dec 2024 Hipolabor Farmacêutica Ltda., Sanval Comércio e Indústria Ltda., Comercial Cirúrgica Rioclarense Ltda. u. a. (5 Unternehmen)CADE: hub-and-spoke cartel in medicines – BRL 45.3m on five companies €7.15m
The CADE Tribunal convicted five companies of a cartel in public tenders for medicines and in private pharmaceutical sales which, according to CADE, operated at least from 2007 to 2011 in states including Minas Gerais, São Paulo, Bahia and Pernambuco; besides direct price-fixing between manufacturers, some manufacturers facilitated collusion between distributors (hub-and-spoke cartel). The fines on the companies total 45,328,574.05 BRL (Hipolabor Farmacêutica 15,741,025.02; Sanval 12,191,091.60; Comercial Cirúrgica Rioclarense 11,952,437.72; Rhamis Distribuidora Farmacêutica 3,585,615.18; Macromed 1,858,404.53 BRL). Proceedings against several other parties were closed for lack of evidence or because settlements had been fulfilled. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.
Manufacturers must neither organise nor facilitate price coordination between their distributors; acting as the "hub" is itself a cartel infringement.
Hub-and-spoke collusion between manufacturers and distributors in tenders
- Authority / court
- Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Art. 20 I–IV i. V. m. Art. 21 I, II, III, VIII Lei nº 8.884/1994, entsprechend Art. 36 I–IV, § 3 I a, c, d Lei nº 12.529/2011; Bemessung nach Art. 37 Lei nº 12.529/2011
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Liability of senior managers
- Measures against individuals are not set out here.
- Published
- 12 Dec 2024
Original amount 45,328,574.05 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Dec 2024.
- Diário Oficial da União, 18.12.2024, Seção 1, S. 92: Ata da 241ª Sessão Ordinária de Julgamento (11.12.2024), PA nº 08012.002222/2011-09 Official register or notice
- CADE, 12.12.2024: Tribunal do Cade condena cartel no setor de medicamentos Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
22 Nov 2024 Viatris Inc.Viatris: 1.5 million GBP – key staff replaced despite hold-separate order €1.8m
During the review of the sale of the European rights to the hormone products Duphaston and Femoston to Theramex, an Initial Enforcement Order was in force. Viatris replaced members of the UK management without the consent of the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and subsequently failed to report the breach; the CMA imposed 1.5 million GBP.
During a merger review, staffing decisions in the target business also require consent – and breaches must be reported immediately.
Standstill and interim obligations in merger proceedings (management, HR)
- Authority / court
- Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Merger control
- Legal basis
- Enterprise Act 2002, s. 72(2) (Initial Enforcement Order), s. 94A
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
Original amount 1,500,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 Nov 2024.
- CMA: Viatris fined £1.5m for failure to comply with CMA order (22.11.2024) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link
Report an error
31 Oct 2024 Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (Teva-Gruppe)EU: 462.6 million EUR against Teva for patent misuse and disparaging a competing medicine €462.6m
Teva abused its dominant position for the MS medicine Copaxone: it artificially extended patent protection by filing staggered divisional applications with the EPO and strategically withdrawing them, and spread misleading statements about an authorised competing product among physicians and decision-makers. Seven Member States were affected over periods of four to nine years.
Communications by sales representatives and medical affairs about competing products must be substantiated and objective; patent strategies of dominant companies require competition law review.
Disparaging statements about competing products to healthcare professionals
- Authority / court
- Europäische Kommission
- Area of law
- Competition law · Abuse of market power
- Legal basis
- Art. 102 AEUV
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Commission fines Teva €462.6 million over misuse of the patent system and disparagement (IP/24/5581) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link
Report an error
24 Jun 2024 a US flavours and fragrances manufacturer and its French subsidiaryFragrance manufacturer: €15.9m fine for deleting WhatsApp messages during an inspection €15.9m
During a European Commission inspection in the fragrance sector in March 2023, a senior employee of the manufacturer, after being informed of the inspection, deleted WhatsApp messages exchanged with a competitor on a mobile phone; the Commission treated this as obstruction of the inspection. It is the Commission's first fine for deleting messages in a messaging app; because of the manufacturer's cooperation, the amount was reduced by 50% to €15.9m (0.15% of total turnover).
During regulatory inspections, companies must immediately ensure that nobody deletes data on work phones or in messaging apps.
Conduct during dawn raids and preservation of evidence in messaging apps
- Authority / court
- Europäische Kommission
- Area of law
- Competition law
- Legal basis
- Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1/2003 (Behinderung einer Nachprüfung)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Culpability
- intentional
- Mitigating circumstances
- Immediate acknowledgement, proactive cooperation and help in recovering the data: 50% reduction.
- Liability of senior managers
- The deletion was carried out by a senior employee; the fine is addressed to the companies.
- Published
- 24 Jun 2024
- Europäische Kommission, Presseraum (Übersicht) (Entscheidung 2024) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Company name anonymised since 24 Jun 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
19 Apr 2024 a Thai plastics companyThai plastics company pays 20 million USD for concealed sales of Iranian polyethylene €18.8m
In 2017–2018, the Thai plastics company had US banks process 467 payments totalling 291 million USD for HDPE plastic produced in an Iranian joint venture with the Iranian state-owned petrochemical group. Shipping and documentation practices concealed the Iranian origin. The penalty was imposed by the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).
Invoicing in US dollars brings US sanctions law into the business – holdings in embargoed countries require strict separation of payment flows.
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
- Legal basis
- Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (31 C.F.R. part 560)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Culpability
- intentional
- Published
- 19 Apr 2024
Original amount 20,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Apr 2024.
- OFAC, Civil Penalties and Enforcement Information (Übersicht) (Entscheidung 2024) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 19 Apr 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
9 Jan 2024 a Brazilian pharmaceutical distributorBrazilian pharmaceutical distributor: CGU fine over false documents in vaccine contract €483,622
The Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU, Office of the Comptroller General) imposed on a pharmaceutical distributor, which now trades under a different name, a fine of BRL 3,879,251.35, extraordinary publication of the decision and a declaration of unsuitability for public contracts (declaração de inidoneidade). According to the final report, in the Ministry of Health's planned purchase of 20 million doses of a Covid-19 vaccine the company submitted a document that the vaccine manufacturer later described as false, as well as pro forma invoices that did not match the contract terms. On a request for reconsideration (pedido de reconsideração) the CGU reduced the fine to BRL 2,586,167.56 on 5 May 2025 and shortened the posting period for the publication from 75 to 60 days; the declaration of unsuitability remained in place.
Anyone contracting with the state as the representative of a foreign manufacturer must check powers of attorney and invoices carefully; false documents lead to fines and debarment.
Authenticity of proof of representation and invoices in public contracts
- Authority / court
- Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU)
- Area of law
- Bribery and corruption
- Legal basis
- Lei nº 12.846/2013, Art. 5 IV b und d, Art. 6; Lei nº 8.666/1993, Art. 87 IV und Art. 88 III
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- reduced
- Sector
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
- Mitigating circumstances
- Following the request for reconsideration, the CGU reduced the fine from BRL 3,879,251.35 to BRL 2,586,167.56.
- Published
- 15 Jan 2024
Original amount 2,586,167.56 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 9 Jan 2024.
- Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU), Veröffentlichung der Behörde (Entscheidung 2024) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 9 Jan 2026 · Direct link