Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

4cases from 1 jurisdiction
€121.7mTotal of monetary amounts
€113.3mLargest single case: a US chemical and technology company
€3.96mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) und Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU) €113.3m 93 % · 1 case
  2. Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo €7.92m 7 % · 2 cases
  3. Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) €483,622 0 % · 1 case

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Bribery and corruption €113.8m 93 % · 2 cases
  2. Competition law €7.92m 7 % · 2 cases

Who?

by company
  1. Anonymised companies €113.8m 93 % · 2 cases
  2. Hipolabor Farmacêutica Ltda., Sanval Comércio e Indústria Ltda., Comercial Cirúrgica Rioclarense Ltda. u. a. (5 Unternehmen) €7.15m 6 % · 1 case
  3. Bayer S.A. €773,398 1 % · 1 case

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20221€113.3m
20230–
20242€7.63m
20251€773,398
20260–

4 cases

28 Apr 2025 Bayer S.A.Bayer pays 5 million BRL in CADE settlement over information exchange among employers BrazilCartels and collusion €773,398

Bayer S.A. concluded a settlement (Termo de Compromisso de Cessação) with the Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE, Brazilian competition authority) in proceedings concerning the exchange of competitively sensitive information between employers in the consumer goods sector with possible effects on the Brazilian labour market. The company admitted its participation, undertook to cease the conduct and to cooperate with the investigation, and allegedly pays 5,003,188.80 BRL to the Fund for Diffuse Rights (FDD). In the same proceedings, 3M do Brasil concluded a separate settlement of allegedly 4,454,414.82 BRL. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Exchanging sensitive HR and labour market information between competing employers also carries competition law risk.

Relevance to training and awareness

Competition law in HR: information exchange between employers

Authority / court
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Lei nº 12.529/2011 (Lei de Defesa da Concorrência), Termo de Compromisso de Cessação
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
6 May 2025

Original amount 5,003,188.8 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Apr 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

11 Dec 2024 Hipolabor Farmacêutica Ltda., Sanval Comércio e Indústria Ltda., Comercial Cirúrgica Rioclarense Ltda. u. a. (5 Unternehmen)CADE: hub-and-spoke cartel in medicines – BRL 45.3m on five companies BrazilCartels and collusion €7.15m

The CADE Tribunal convicted five companies of a cartel in public tenders for medicines and in private pharmaceutical sales which, according to CADE, operated at least from 2007 to 2011 in states including Minas Gerais, São Paulo, Bahia and Pernambuco; besides direct price-fixing between manufacturers, some manufacturers facilitated collusion between distributors (hub-and-spoke cartel). The fines on the companies total 45,328,574.05 BRL (Hipolabor Farmacêutica 15,741,025.02; Sanval 12,191,091.60; Comercial Cirúrgica Rioclarense 11,952,437.72; Rhamis Distribuidora Farmacêutica 3,585,615.18; Macromed 1,858,404.53 BRL). Proceedings against several other parties were closed for lack of evidence or because settlements had been fulfilled. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Manufacturers must neither organise nor facilitate price coordination between their distributors; acting as the "hub" is itself a cartel infringement.

Relevance to training and awareness

Hub-and-spoke collusion between manufacturers and distributors in tenders

Authority / court
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), Tribunal Administrativo
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 20 I–IV i. V. m. Art. 21 I, II, III, VIII Lei nº 8.884/1994, entsprechend Art. 36 I–IV, § 3 I a, c, d Lei nº 12.529/2011; Bemessung nach Art. 37 Lei nº 12.529/2011
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
12 Dec 2024

Original amount 45,328,574.05 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Dec 2024.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

9 Jan 2024 a Brazilian pharmaceutical distributorBrazilian pharmaceutical distributor: CGU fine over false documents in vaccine contract BrazilBribery and corruptionanonymised €483,622

The Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU, Office of the Comptroller General) imposed on a pharmaceutical distributor, which now trades under a different name, a fine of BRL 3,879,251.35, extraordinary publication of the decision and a declaration of unsuitability for public contracts (declaração de inidoneidade). According to the final report, in the Ministry of Health's planned purchase of 20 million doses of a Covid-19 vaccine the company submitted a document that the vaccine manufacturer later described as false, as well as pro forma invoices that did not match the contract terms. On a request for reconsideration (pedido de reconsideração) the CGU reduced the fine to BRL 2,586,167.56 on 5 May 2025 and shortened the posting period for the publication from 75 to 60 days; the declaration of unsuitability remained in place.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone contracting with the state as the representative of a foreign manufacturer must check powers of attorney and invoices carefully; false documents lead to fines and debarment.

Relevance to training and awareness

Authenticity of proof of representation and invoices in public contracts

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption
Legal basis
Lei nº 12.846/2013, Art. 5 IV b und d, Art. 6; Lei nº 8.666/1993, Art. 87 IV und Art. 88 III
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
reduced
Sector
Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Mitigating circumstances
Following the request for reconsideration, the CGU reduced the fine from BRL 3,879,251.35 to BRL 2,586,167.56.
Published
15 Jan 2024

Original amount 2,586,167.56 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 9 Jan 2024.

Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 9 Jan 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

19 Dec 2022 a US chemical and technology companyUS chemical company: BRL 638m leniency agreement over bribery in state-owned group contracts BrazilBribery of public officialsanonymised €113.3m

A US chemical and technology company undertook, in a leniency agreement with the Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU, Office of the Comptroller General) and the Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU, Office of the Attorney General), to pay BRL 638,046,365.87 (equivalent to USD 120,828,384.25) because, in connection with contracts with a state-controlled oil company, it had made improper payments for the benefit of public officials through intermediary companies. According to the annexes, USD 75,817,531.39 relates to disgorgement of profit and USD 10,601,873.74 to presumed damage (bribes) in favour of the oil company, while USD 5,708,217.91 is the fine under the Anti-Corruption Act (Lei 12.846/2013) and USD 28,700,761.19 the fine under the Administrative Improbity Act (Lei 8.429/1992). According to its own statement, the company concluded agreements with the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF), the US Department of Justice and the SEC on the same day.

What organisations can take from it

Payments to officials of state-owned clients routed through intermediary companies lead to disgorgement and fines under several legal bases at once.

Relevance to training and awareness

Bribery through intermediary companies in contracts with a state-owned enterprise

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) und Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Lei 12.846/2013, Arts. 16 und 17; Lei 8.429/1992; Decreto 11.129/2022, Art. 33
Action
Disgorgement of profits
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Mitigating circumstances
Credit was given for remediation of damage (1%), cooperation (1%), voluntary admission (2%) and an applied compliance programme (3.06%).
Liability of senior managers
The fine calculation treated tolerance or knowledge by senior management as an aggravating factor at the maximum rate of 3%.

Original amount 638,046,365.87 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Dec 2022.

Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 19 Dec 2024 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial