Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America and Asia-Pacific: 1,847 cases from 39 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by authority- Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) €113.6m 100 % · 1 case
What for?
by area of lawAll areas of law
Who?
by company- Barratt Redrow, Persimmon, Taylor Wimpey u. a. (7 Wohnungsbauunternehmen) €113.6m 96 % · 1 case
- Dragon Alfa Cement Limited €1.17m 1 % · 1 case
- Lanes Group Limited €917,326 1 % · 1 case
- Tarmac Building Products Limited €731,124 1 % · 1 case
- SCS Railways (Joint Venture von Skanska Construction UK Limited, Costain Limited und Strabag AG) €462,583 0 % · 1 case
- Hillbeck Homes (Sowerby Bridge) Ltd €349,895 0 % · 1 case
- Home Improvement Marketing Ltd €347,343 0 % · 1 case
- Green Spark Energy Ltd €289,452 0 % · 1 case
- Thermotech Wall and Loft Surveys Ltd €276,928 0 % · 1 case
- BDW Trading (Barratt Redrow) €234,153 0 % · 1 case
- 5 more€240,104
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 2023 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2025 | 1 | €113.6m |
| Q1 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2026 | 0 | – |
1 case
30 Oct 2025 Barratt Redrow, Persimmon, Taylor Wimpey u. a. (7 Wohnungsbauunternehmen)CMA: seven housebuilders pay GBP 100m after suspected information exchange €113.6m
The CMA accepted binding commitments from Barratt Redrow, Bellway, Berkeley, Bloor Homes, Persimmon, Taylor Wimpey and Vistry after investigating whether they had exchanged competitively sensitive information such as achieved sale prices. The companies committed to stop sharing such information, introduce compliance measures and annual competition law training, help develop industry guidance and jointly pay GBP 100m to affordable housing programmes; no infringement was found.
Even exchanging current sale prices with competitors can trigger a competition investigation and large payments; contacts with competitors need clear rules and training.
Exchanging pricing and sales information with competitors
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Chapter I prohibition Competition Act 1998 (Verdacht); Verpflichtungszusagen nach section 31A Competition Act 1998
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Construction and real estate
- Published
- 30 Oct 2025
Original amount 100,000,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Oct 2025.
- CMA case page: Investigation into suspected anti-competitive conduct by housebuilders Enforcement database of an authority
- CMA: Decision to accept commitments in relation to suspected anti-competitive conduct by certain housebuilders, Case 51392 (30 October 2025) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link