Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

4cases from 1 jurisdiction
€74,341Total of monetary amounts (2 cases with an amount)
€69,524Largest single case: an Australian car repair garage
€37,171Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. WorkSafe Victoria €69,524 94 % · 1 case
  2. NSW Fair Trading €4,817 6 % · 3 cases

What for?

by area of law

All areas of law

  1. Health and safety and employment law €69,524 94 % · 1 case
  2. Consumer protection and online retail €4,817 6 % · 3 cases

Who?

by company
  1. Anonymised companies €74,341 100 % · 2 cases
  2. Atom Motorss Pty Ltd – 0 % · 1 case
  3. OzCar Pty Ltd – 0 % · 1 case

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20231€69,524
20241€4,817
20251–
20261–

4 cases

22 Jun 2026 OzCar Pty LtdUsed car dealer OzCar: reprimand and licence conditions over unfair sales practices AustraliaMisleading advertising and pricing Fine

NSW Fair Trading (the consumer protection regulator of New South Wales) reprimanded used car dealer OzCar Pty Ltd on 22 June 2026 and imposed conditions on its dealer licence. The regulator refers to the maximum available in disciplinary proceedings and does not state the amount imposed on the company. The investigation found a pattern of dishonest conduct between 2023 and 2025; among other things, customers reported being pressured into signing or misled about the purpose of contracts, that contracts were not properly explained – including to particularly vulnerable buyers – and that vehicles of unacceptable quality were sold. Among other things, the company must introduce a compliance programme with training for sales staff, may no longer allow waivers of the statutory cooling-off right to be pre-filled, and must fix defects affecting safety or reliability before sale.

What organisations can take from it

Waivers of a cooling-off right must never be pre-selected, and contracts must be demonstrably explained to customers – especially vulnerable buyers.

Relevance to training and awareness

Fair sales conversations, cooling-off rights and dealing with vulnerable customers

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
NSW Fair Trading
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Motor Dealers and Repairers Act 2013 (NSW), s 45(1)(a), (b), (d) und (d1)(ii)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
24 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Nov 2025 Atom Motorss Pty LtdNSW: car dealer Atom Motorss loses licence over false security interest information AustraliaMisleading advertising and pricing Other

NSW Fair Trading (the consumer protection regulator of New South Wales) cancelled the motor dealer licence of Atom Motorss Pty Ltd on 17 November 2025 and disqualified the company for five years. Measures against individuals are not set out here. According to the release, the company had traded as a motor dealer without a licence and, when selling vehicles to consumers, had given false information from the Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR, the register of security interests in personal property) in the prescribed dealer forms.

What organisations can take from it

Information on encumbrances on a vehicle must come from a current register search; false statements in dealer forms can cost the business its licence.

Relevance to training and awareness

Accurate information on encumbrances and security interests when selling used cars

Authority / court
NSW Fair Trading
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Motor Dealers and Repairers Act 2013 (NSW), s 45(1)(f) und (g); zugrunde liegende Verstöße gegen den Motor Dealers and Repairers Act 2013 und das Australian Consumer Law
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
12 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

9 Aug 2024 an Australian trailer manufacturerNSW: trailer maker convicted for failing to deliver paid-for trailers AustraliaConsumer protection and online retailanonymised €4,817

Following a prosecution by NSW Fair Trading (the consumer protection regulator of New South Wales), Kempsey Local Court on 9 August 2024 fined the trailer maker 8,000 AUD after it had accepted 70,000 AUD from customers for custom trailers between 2020 and 2023 but failed to deliver them within a reasonable time or, in some cases, at all. Measures against individuals are not set out here.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone taking deposits must secure delivery or refund promptly – otherwise the company also faces criminal liability.

Relevance to training and awareness

Taking prepayments only when delivery is secured, otherwise refunding promptly

Authority / court
NSW Fair Trading
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail
Legal basis
Nichtlieferung bezahlter Waren (Vorschriften in der Mitteilung nicht genannt); Tätigkeit in der Kfz-Händlerbranche trotz Sperre
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
30 Aug 2024

Original amount 8,000 AUD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 9 Aug 2024.

Checked against the official source on 8 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 9 Aug 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

27 Sep 2023 an Australian car repair garageAustralian car repair garage: 115,000 AUD after fatal crash following 89 hours on call AustraliaWorking timeanonymised €69,524

The garage, which ran a roadside assistance service as a subcontractor of a motoring club, was fined 115,000 AUD by the County Court in Melbourne after a guilty plea for failing to provide a safe system of work and information or training to protect against fatigue. Both of its breakdown assistance drivers regularly spent 96 hours on call across four days and nights; in March 2018 one of them left the road and died after 89 hours on call and 17 hours of work, and traces at the scene suggested that he had fallen asleep while driving.

What organisations can take from it

On-call duty must be limited by maximum shift lengths and minimum breaks so that employees can rest adequately between call-outs.

Relevance to training and awareness

Fatigue from long on-call periods and working hours

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
WorkSafe Victoria
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Working time
Legal basis
Arbeitsschutzrecht Victoria: Pflicht zu sicheren Arbeitssystemen sowie zu Information, Unterweisung und Schulung
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Mitigating circumstances
Guilty plea.
Published
27 Sep 2023

Original amount 115,000 AUD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Sep 2023.

Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 27 Sep 2025 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial