Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

3cases from 1 jurisdiction
€786,106Total of monetary amounts (2 cases with an amount)
€657,549Largest single case: Vanilla Chip LLC (TruHeight)
€393,053Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by level
  1. Federal level €786,106 100 % · 3 cases

What for?

by action
  1. Disgorgement of profits €786,106 100 % · 2 cases
  2. Order — 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Food and agriculture €657,549 84 % · 1 case
  2. Healthcare €128,557 16 % · 1 case
  3. Media and online platforms — 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20251—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20251€128,557
Q1 20260—
Q2 20260—
Q3 20261€657,549

3 cases

15 Jul 2026 Vanilla Chip LLC (TruHeight)TruHeight: FTC settlement over allegedly fake reviews for growth supplement USAFake reviews €657,549

According to the FTC, employees of the dietary supplement provider wrote thousands of five-star reviews, customers received free products or discounts in return for five-star reviews, and bot profiles posed as real users; in addition, there were unsubstantiated growth claims for children and adolescents. The final settlement order provides for a judgment of 4 million USD, which is partially suspended on account of limited ability to pay after payment of 750,000 USD.

What organisations can take from it

Reviews by employees or reviews rewarded for positive star ratings are prohibited and, since 2024, subject to civil penalties.

Relevance to training and awareness

Fake and purchased customer reviews

Authority / court
Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Fake reviews
Legal basis
Section 5 FTC Act; FTC Rule on the Use of Consumer Reviews and Testimonials
Action
Disgorgement of profits
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Mitigating circumstances
Partial suspension of the judgment on account of limited ability to pay.
Liability of senior managers
The co-founders and co-CEOs Eden Stelmach and Justin Rapoport are personally parties to the order.
Published
15 Jul 2026

Original amount 750,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

3 Dec 2025 Southern Health Solutions, Inc. (Next Medical / NextMed)NextMed: FTC settlement over allegations of hidden costs and review manipulation USAFake reviews €128,557

According to the FTC, the telemedicine company advertised GLP-1 weight-loss programmes with monthly prices that did not include medication, laboratory costs and medical consultations, concealed the minimum term and cancellation fees, published fake testimonials from employees and relatives, and induced customers to delete negative reviews by offering vouchers or refunds. Under the final settlement order, the company and its management are paying 150,000 USD, which is earmarked for refunds.

What organisations can take from it

"Buying off" negative reviews with vouchers is just as misleading as inventing positive ones.

Relevance to training and awareness

Review manipulation and price disclosures

Authority / court
Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Fake reviews
Legal basis
Section 5 FTC Act; Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act (ROSCA)
Action
Disgorgement of profits
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Healthcare
Liability of senior managers
Founder Robert Epstein and CEO Frank Leonardo III are named in the press release as parties involved.
Published
3 Dec 2025

Original amount 150,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Dec 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

3 Jan 2025 GGL Projects, Inc. (Sitejabber)Sitejabber: review platform counted reviews before goods were received USAFake reviews Order

According to the FTC, the AI-powered review platform collected star ratings for its business customers at the time of purchase, before customers had received the product or service, thereby inflating average ratings and review counts, including in search engine results. The FTC issued a final settlement order prohibiting such misrepresentations.

What organisations can take from it

Ratings submitted before use must not be included in averages as experience-based reviews.

Authority / court
Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Fake reviews
Legal basis
Section 5 FTC Act
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Media and online platforms
Published
3 Jan 2025
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial