Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific: 1,838 cases from 37 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

1case from 1 jurisdiction
€562,720Total of monetary amounts
€562,720Largest single case: Brand Developers Limited (The TV Shop)
€562,720Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. District Court (Anklage: Commerce Commission) €562,720 100 % · 1 case

What for?

by action
  1. Fine €562,720 100 % · 1 case

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Retail and e-commerce €562,720 100 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20240–
Q1 20250–
Q2 20250–
Q3 20250–
Q4 20250–
Q1 20260–
Q2 20260–
Q3 20261€562,720
Q4 20260–

1 case

6 Aug 2026 Brand Developers Limited (The TV Shop)The TV Shop: 1,104,000 NZD for manipulated online reviews and misleading claims New ZealandFake reviews €562,720

The company behind The TV Shop had its own staff post positive product reviews without disclosing the connection, and published one- to three-star reviews only if customers responded to a follow-up email. It also gave customers the impression that they had no rights under the Consumer Guarantees Act beyond a 30-day money-back guarantee, and advertised an accessory pack for the Air Roaster Pro as “free” although it was always included. After a guilty verdict on 13 charges, the District Court imposed 1,104,000 NZD on 6 August 2026; the company had already been fined in 2015 (153,000 NZD) and 2022 (123,500 NZD).

What organisations can take from it

Staff reviews without disclosure and filtering out negative reviews are misleading – review processes need clear rules and oversight.

Relevance to training and awareness

Authenticity of online reviews and accurate statements on consumer rights

Authority / court
District Court (Anklage: Commerce Commission)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Fake reviews
Legal basis
Fair Trading Act 1986, ss 10, 13(e), 13(i), 40(1)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Culpability
intentional
Repeat case
yes
Liability of senior managers
According to the sentencing decision, managers and executives knew about the review practices and at times directed them themselves.
Published
11 Aug 2026

Original amount 1,104,000 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 6 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial