Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

5cases from 1 jurisdiction
€5.86mTotal of monetary amounts (2 cases with an amount)
€2.93mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) 5 cases 100 % · €5.86m

What for?

by topic
  1. Misleading advertising and pricing 3 cases 60 % · €5.86m
  2. Fake reviews 2 cases 40 % ·

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Media and online platforms 3 cases 60 % · €1.03m
  2. Retail and e-commerce 1 case 20 % ·
  3. Other 1 case 20 % · €4.83m

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20251—
Q2 20251—
Q3 20251—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20262€5.86m
Q3 20260—

5 cases

23 Jun 2026 TICKETBIS S.L. (StubHub UK)StubHub UK: 889,200 GBP penalty over mandatory fees added later United KingdomMisleading advertising and pricing €1.03m

The ticket exchange did not include mandatory fees in the total price at the start of the purchasing process. By way of a final infringement notice, the CMA imposed a penalty of 889,200 GBP (including a 40 % settlement discount) and required the company to refund the mandatory fees.

What organisations can take from it

Ticket marketplaces must also show the total price including mandatory fees from the outset.

Authority / court
Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Media and online platforms
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement with a 40 % discount and waiver of appeal.
Published
23 Jun 2026

Original amount 889,200 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Jun 2026.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

15 Apr 2026 Automobile Association Developments Limited (AA Driving School, BSM Driving School)AA and BSM driving schools: 4.2 million GBP for drip pricing – CMA's first consumer fine United KingdomMisleading advertising and pricing €4.83m

For online bookings, the driving schools only showed a mandatory booking fee at checkout instead of in the initial price. Following an admission and settlement, the CMA imposed a penalty of 4.2 million GBP (40 % discount on 7 million GBP) and ordered refunds of more than 760,000 GBP to more than 80,000 customers.

What organisations can take from it

Mandatory fees must be included from the very first price – in the United Kingdom, the CMA has been able to impose fines for this itself since 2025.

Relevance to training and awareness

Price disclosures and mandatory fees at online checkout

Authority / court
Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Other
Mitigating circumstances
Admission and early settlement (40 % discount).
Published
15 Apr 2026

Original amount 4,200,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Apr 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

25 Sep 2025 TicketmasterTicketmaster commits to price transparency following Oasis presale United KingdomMisleading advertising and pricing Order

The CMA objected that, during the Oasis presale, fans in the queue were not told that standing tickets were being sold at two price levels, and that "Platinum" tickets cost almost 2.5 times as much without it being adequately explained that they offered no added value compared with some standard tickets. Without admitting liability, Ticketmaster gave undertakings: advance notice of tiered pricing, price ranges in the queue, no misleading ticket descriptions and a two-year reporting obligation.

What organisations can take from it

Disclose dynamic or tiered prices before purchase; product descriptions must not suggest added value that does not exist.

Authority / court
Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Britisches Verbraucherschutzrecht (Verfahren nach den vor April 2025 geltenden Befugnissen; Verpflichtungszusagen)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Media and online platforms
Employees
10,000 or more
Mitigating circumstances
Undertakings without admission of liability.
Published
25 Sep 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

6 Jun 2025 AmazonAmazon commits to the CMA to tougher action against fake reviews United KingdomFake reviews Order

Following an investigation into fake reviews and "catalogue abuse" (transferring good reviews to other products), Amazon undertook to the CMA to detect and remove such reviews quickly, to sanction infringing sellers up to and including a ban on selling, and to set up simple reporting channels.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone who publishes reviews must maintain active processes against fakes and the transfer of reviews.

Authority / court
Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Fake reviews
Legal basis
Enterprise Act 2002, Part 8 (Verpflichtungszusagen nach altem Durchsetzungsregime)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Employees
10,000 or more
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary undertakings without a fine.
Published
6 Jun 2025
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

24 Jan 2025 GoogleGoogle commits to the CMA to tougher action against fake reviews United KingdomFake reviews Order

Google undertook to the CMA to improve the detection and removal of fake reviews, to ban repeat offenders worldwide, to place warnings on business profiles with manipulated reviews and deactivate their review function, and to set up simple reporting channels; the CMA will monitor implementation for three years.

What organisations can take from it

Companies that buy reviews risk visible warnings and the loss of their reviews on platforms.

Authority / court
Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Fake reviews
Legal basis
Britisches Verbraucherschutzrecht (Verpflichtungszusagen)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Media and online platforms
Employees
10,000 or more
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary undertakings without a fine.
Published
24 Jan 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial