Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,033 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

2cases from 1 jurisdiction
€35,180Total of monetary amounts
€32,753Largest single case: African Bank Limited
€17,590Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) €32,753 93 % · 1 case
  2. National Consumer Tribunal (auf Antrag der National Consumer Commission) €2,427 7 % · 1 case

What for?

by topic
  1. Misleading advertising and pricing €32,753 93 % · 1 case
  2. no topic €2,427 7 % · 1 case

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Financial services and insurance €32,753 93 % · 1 case
  2. Automotive €2,427 7 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20240–
Q1 20250–
Q2 20251€32,753
Q3 20251€2,427
Q4 20250–
Q1 20260–
Q2 20260–
Q3 20260–
Q4 20260–

2 cases

22 Apr 2025 African Bank LimitedAfrican Bank: ZAR 700,000 for social-media loan advert presented as an 'investment' South AfricaMisleading advertising and pricing €32,753

A social-media campaign by the bank in December 2023 (#KeFestive), featuring a well-known public figure, presented personal loans as an investment; the authority found this factually incorrect and misleading and also identified weaknesses in the approval process for advertising. Of the 700,000 ZAR penalty, 200,000 ZAR was suspended for two years; the bank has paid 500,000 ZAR. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Advertising for credit products – including with well-known personalities – needs a competent, documented approval that describes the nature of the product correctly.

Relevance to training and awareness

Advert approval and influencer marketing for financial products

Authority / court
Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Sections 6(1), 6(3)(a), 6(3)(b) und 6(9) Conduct Standard 3 of 2020 (Banks)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation during the investigation and prompt remedial action; 200,000 ZAR suspended for two years, provided the bank complies with the Conduct Standard.
Published
22 Apr 2025

Original amount 700,000 ZAR, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 Apr 2025.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

8 Sep 2025 Kia East Rand (Pty) LtdDefective used car: fine and refund order against Kia East Rand South AfricaConsumer protection and online retail €2,427

On 8 September 2025, on application by the National Consumer Commission (NCC, South Africa's consumer protection authority), the National Consumer Tribunal (NCT, the consumer protection adjudicator) found that car dealer Kia East Rand (Pty) Ltd had breached section 56(3) of the Consumer Protection Act: a used car sold in September 2022 remained defective despite several repair attempts, and the dealer refused the buyer's request to cancel the sale. The Tribunal ordered a refund of the purchase price of 245,075 ZAR within ten days and imposed an administrative fine of 50,000 ZAR.

What organisations can take from it

If a repair fails, the Consumer Protection Act requires the dealer to replace or refund – refusing risks a fine on top of the refund.

Relevance to training and awareness

Warranty obligations in used car sales

Authority / court
National Consumer Tribunal (auf Antrag der National Consumer Commission)
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail
Legal basis
Section 56(3) Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008; Verwaltungsstrafe nach Section 112
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Repeat case
no

Original amount 50,000 ZAR, converted at the ECB reference rate of 8 Sep 2025.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial