Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

Consumer protection and online retail Defence and security Clear all filters

1case from 1 jurisdiction

€4.25mTotal of monetary amounts

€4.25mLargest single case: an Italian alarm system provider

€4.25mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

by amount by number of cases

Where?

by region

All jurisdictions

EU €4.25m 100 % · 1 case

What for?

by topic

Misleading advertising and pricing €4.25m 100 % · 1 case

Who?

by company

Anonymised companies €4.25m 100 % · 1 case

When?

per year, by date of decision

Trend
Period	Cases	Total
2024	1	€4.25m
2025	0	–
2026	0	–

1 case

Newest first Highest amounts

12 Mar 2024 an Italian alarm system providerAGCM fines alarm system provider €4.25m over advertising and cancellation hurdles ItalyMisleading advertising and pricinganonymised €4.25m

The provider did not make clear in its advertising that the alarm system is only lent under an open-ended security subscription, obstructed cancellations through continued invoicing and delayed removal, started providing the service during the withdrawal period without an express request and stated the competent court unclearly. The AGCM imposed fines of 1,200,000, 2,500,000, 500,000 and 50,000 EUR, a total of 4,250,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Rental models must be clearly identifiable as subscriptions in advertising, and a cancellation must be implemented promptly without further billing.

Relevance to training and awareness

Transparent subscription models and smooth cancellation

Authority / court: Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM)
Area of law: Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis: Art. 20, 21, 22, 24, 26 Abs. 1 lit. f, 50 Abs. 3, 51 Abs. 8, 57 Abs. 4 lit. a Nr. 2, 66-bis Codice del consumo (D.lgs. 206/2005)
Action: Fine
Status of proceedings: unknown
Sector: Defence and security
Published: 26 Mar 2024

Sources

AGCM, Suche nach Entscheidungen (Entscheidung 2024) Decision of an authority

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Company name anonymised since 12 Mar 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

How the radar is compiled

Official sources only

Every case is based on a decision, press release or database of an authority or a court. Press and law-firm reports count at most as additional references.

Four-eyes check

Whoever enters a case may not approve it. A second, independent check compares company, date, amount and area of law with the source. Only then is the case published.

Comparable amounts

Amounts are converted at the ECB reference rate on the day of the decision. Each case also shows the original amount.

Corrections on record

A correction is a new version that is checked again. Every change is logged. You can report errors directly on each case.

Case texts are translated from the German original. Where a translation is not yet available, the German text is shown and marked “(German original)”. Names of authorities, laws and companies are given as in the source (company names until they are anonymised).

Company names are anonymised two years after the decision in a case, in line with the practice of many supervisory authorities. The official sources remain linked.

The radar reports on published decisions and is not legal advice. Decisions that are not yet final are marked as such where the status is known.

Embed the radar on your website

Ready for training that actually lands?