Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,033 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

Japan Consumer protection and online retail Chemicals and pharmaceuticals Clear all filters

1case from 1 jurisdiction

–Total of monetary amounts (0 cases with an amount)

–Largest single case

–Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

by amount by number of cases

Where?

by authority

Consumer Affairs Agency (消費者庁, CAA) – 0 % · 1 case

What for?

by topic

Misleading advertising and pricing – 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by company

P&G Japan G.K. (P&Gジャパン合同会社) – 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision

Trend
Period	Cases	Total
Q4 2023	0	–
Q1 2024	0	–
Q2 2024	0	–
Q3 2024	0	–
Q4 2024	0	–
Q1 2025	0	–
Q2 2025	0	–
Q3 2025	1	–
Q4 2025	0	–
Q1 2026	0	–
Q2 2026	0	–
Q3 2026	0	–
Q4 2026	0	–

1 case

Newest first Highest amounts

1 Aug 2025 P&G Japan G.K. (P&Gジャパン合同会社)P&G Japan: order over unsubstantiated anti-mould claims for a Febreze product JapanMisleading advertising and pricing Order

P&G Japan advertised its 'Febreze bathroom anti-mould' product (ファブリーズお風呂用防カビ剤), among other things on the packaging from April 2022 to May 2023, by claiming that simply placing it in the bathroom would prevent black mould for around six weeks. The documents submitted did not substantiate this effect, so the advertising was deemed misleading; the order required a corrective notice, measures to prevent recurrence and cessation.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone promising an effect must hold robust evidence before advertising; without it, the claim is deemed misleading.

Relevance to training and awareness

Substantiating efficacy claims in advertising

Authority / court: Consumer Affairs Agency (消費者庁, CAA)
Area of law: Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis: Art. 7 Abs. 1 und 2 i. V. m. Art. 5 Nr. 1 Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations (不当景品類及び不当表示防止法, Gesetz Nr. 134/1962)
Action: Order
Status of proceedings: unknown
Sector: Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Published: 1 Aug 2025

Sources

P&Gジャパン合同会社に対する景品表示法に基づく措置命令について (Eintrag, 01.08.2025) Press release of an authority
News Release 01.08.2025 mit Maßnahmenanordnung 消表対第1255号 (PDF) Decision of an authority

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

How the radar is compiled

Official sources only

Every case is based on a decision, press release or database of an authority or a court. Press and law-firm reports count at most as additional references.

Four-eyes check

Whoever enters a case may not approve it. A second, independent check compares company, date, amount and area of law with the source. Only then is the case published.

Comparable amounts

Amounts are converted at the ECB reference rate on the day of the decision. Each case also shows the original amount.

Corrections on record

A correction is a new version that is checked again. Every change is logged. You can report errors directly on each case.

Case texts are translated from the German original. Where a translation is not yet available, the German text is shown and marked “(German original)”. Names of authorities, laws and companies are given as in the source (company names until they are anonymised).

Company names are anonymised two years after the decision in a case, in line with the practice of many supervisory authorities. The official sources remain linked.

The radar reports on published decisions and is not legal advice. Decisions that are not yet final are marked as such where the status is known.

Embed the radar on your website

Ready for training that actually lands?