Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific: 1,838 cases from 37 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

1case from 1 jurisdiction
–Total of monetary amounts (0 cases with an amount)
–Largest single case
–Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by region

All jurisdictions

  1. Australia – 0 % · 1 case

What for?

by topic
  1. Misleading advertising and pricing – 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. Anonymised companies €6m 55 % · 1 case
  2. ALD Automotive Italia S.r.l. €5m 45 % · 1 case
  3. Atom Motorss Pty Ltd – 0 % · 1 case
  4. OzCar Pty Ltd – 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20240–
Q1 20250–
Q2 20250–
Q3 20250–
Q4 20250–
Q1 20260–
Q2 20261–
Q3 20260–
Q4 20260–

1 case

22 Jun 2026 OzCar Pty LtdUsed car dealer OzCar: reprimand and licence conditions over unfair sales practices AustraliaMisleading advertising and pricing Fine

NSW Fair Trading (the consumer protection regulator of New South Wales) reprimanded used car dealer OzCar Pty Ltd on 22 June 2026 and imposed conditions on its dealer licence. The regulator refers to the maximum available in disciplinary proceedings and does not state the amount imposed on the company. The investigation found a pattern of dishonest conduct between 2023 and 2025; among other things, customers reported being pressured into signing or misled about the purpose of contracts, that contracts were not properly explained – including to particularly vulnerable buyers – and that vehicles of unacceptable quality were sold. Among other things, the company must introduce a compliance programme with training for sales staff, may no longer allow waivers of the statutory cooling-off right to be pre-filled, and must fix defects affecting safety or reliability before sale.

What organisations can take from it

Waivers of a cooling-off right must never be pre-selected, and contracts must be demonstrably explained to customers – especially vulnerable buyers.

Relevance to training and awareness

Fair sales conversations, cooling-off rights and dealing with vulnerable customers

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
NSW Fair Trading
Area of law
Consumer protection and online retail · Misleading advertising and pricing
Legal basis
Motor Dealers and Repairers Act 2013 (NSW), s 45(1)(a), (b), (d) und (d1)(ii)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
24 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial