Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

8cases from 1 jurisdiction
€4.2bnTotal of monetary amounts
€1.53bnLargest single case: Cummins Inc.
€88.9mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20241€1.53bn
Q2 20240—
Q3 20243€11.9m
Q4 20240—
Q1 20252€2.49bn
Q2 20251€266,631
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20261€168.7m
Q3 20260—

8 cases

18 May 2026 Volvo Group North America, LLCVolvo Group North America: settlement of around 197 million USD over undisclosed emission control devices USA, CAEmissions and permits €168.7m

Around 10,000 heavy-duty Volvo diesel engines from model years 2010 to 2016 used auxiliary emission control devices (AECDs) that were not disclosed during certification and emitted more NOx than permitted. The settlement with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) comprises 17.5 million USD in penalties and costs, 71 million USD for mitigation measures and 108 million USD for emission reduction projects in California.

What organisations can take from it

Every emissions-relevant control function must be fully disclosed in the certification application; otherwise high settlement payments may follow years later.

Authority / court
California Air Resources Board (CARB)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Kalifornische Emissions- und Zertifizierungsvorschriften für schwere Nutzfahrzeugmotoren
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Automotive
Employees
10,000 or more
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation during the investigation; recall and extended warranty for engines from model years 2014 to 2016.
Published
18 May 2026

Original amount 196,500,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 May 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

14 May 2025 Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyNorfolk Southern: EPA fine for locomotives without valid emissions certification USAEmissions and permits €266,631

In the view of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the freight railway operated locomotives without a certificate of conformity, did not comply with the conditions of a testing exemption for several locomotives and operated locomotives in breach of the applicable emission standards. Under the settlement (Consent Agreement and Final Order), the company is paying a civil penalty of 299,000 USD.

What organisations can take from it

Converted vehicles or vehicles exempted for testing are also subject to certification and restoration obligations, which must be tracked in fleet management.

Authority / court
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 3
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Clean Air Act §§ 203(a), 213(d) (42 U.S.C. §§ 7522(a), 7547(d)); 40 C.F.R. § 1068.101
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Employees
10,000 or more

Original amount 299,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 14 May 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

19 Mar 2025 Hino Motors, Ltd.Hino Motors: over 1.6 billion USD in fines and forfeiture for emissions fraud USAEmissions and permits €1.48bn

Between 2010 and 2019, the Toyota subsidiary submitted false certification applications, altered emissions data and fabricated test results; more than 105,000 non-compliant diesel engines were imported into the USA. The court imposed a fine of 521.76 million USD and forfeiture of 1.087 billion USD, plus five years of probation with an import ban on Hino diesel engines.

What organisations can take from it

Manipulated test data in approval procedures lead to penalties that threaten a company's existence and to market bans; testing processes need independent controls.

Relevance to training and awareness

Data integrity in testing and approval procedures

Authority / court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Ermittlungen: EPA Criminal Investigation Division, FBI)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Clean Air Act; Verschwörung zum Betrug der Vereinigten Staaten und Schmuggel (Schuldbekenntnis)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
intentional
Published
19 Mar 2025

Original amount 1,608,760,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Mar 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

15 Jan 2025 Hino Motors, Ltd.; Hino Motors Manufacturing U.S.A., Inc.; Hino Motors Sales U.S.A., Inc.Hino Motors: over 1 billion USD in penalties for falsified emissions test data USAEmissions and permits €1.02bn

From 2010 to 2019, the Toyota subsidiary altered test data, carried out tests improperly or fabricated them entirely for more than 50 engine families (around 105,000 on-road and 5,700 off-road diesel engines). The resolution with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Justice comprises a civil penalty of 525 million USD and a criminal fine of 521.76 million USD (together 1.047 billion USD), five years of probation and an import ban on diesel engines; including the recall and mitigation measures, the overall resolution totals more than 1.6 billion USD.

What organisations can take from it

Certification data is evidence – companies that embellish test results risk their existence, loss of market access and criminal prosecution.

Relevance to training and awareness

Integrity of test and certification data

Authority / court
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / U.S. Department of Justice
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Clean Air Act
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Culpability
intentional

Original amount 1,046,760,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Jan 2025.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

16 Sep 2024 COBB Tuning Products, LLCCOBB Tuning: 2.914 million USD for over 81,000 tuners that disable emission controls USA, TXEmissions and permits €2.62m

Since 2015, the Austin-based manufacturer has sold more than 81,000 tuners that deactivate emission controls, as well as 8,400 exhaust pipes with fewer or weaker catalytic converters. The proposed settlement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Justice (subject to court approval) provides for a civil penalty of 2,914,000 USD in four instalments, as well as a ban on defeat devices, removal of the ‘delete’ functions, information for dealers and customers, buy-back and destruction of such devices held by employees, and Clean Air Act training for the workforce.

What organisations can take from it

Tuning products that circumvent emission controls are prohibited even as ‘racing parts’ – product approvals require an emissions review.

Relevance to training and awareness

Emissions law for aftermarket products

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Clean Air Act § 203(a)(3)(B), 42 U.S.C. § 7522(a)(3)(B)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Mitigating circumstances
Amount of the penalty based on demonstrated limited ability to pay; payment in instalments.

Original amount 2,914,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Sep 2024.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

10 Sep 2024 Rudy's Performance Parts, Inc.Rudy's Performance Parts: 10 million USD in criminal and civil penalties for defeat devices USAEmissions and permits €9.07m

From 2014 to 2019, the North Carolina company and its CEO Aaron Rudolf manufactured, sold or installed over 250,000 parts for Ford, GM and Dodge diesel pickups in order to remove emission controls – according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), producing as much in emissions as more than 11 million additional vehicles. A total of 10 million USD: a civil penalty of 7 million USD in instalments (settlement subject to court approval), a criminal fine of 2.4 million USD against the company together with three years' probation, and a fine of 600,000 USD against the CEO.

What organisations can take from it

Those who run emissions tampering as a business model are liable under civil and criminal law – all the way up to management.

Authority / court
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / U.S. Department of Justice
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Clean Air Act § 203(a)(3)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Payment in instalments because of demonstrated limited ability to pay.
Liability of senior managers
CEO Aaron Rudolf: three years' probation and a fine of 600,000 USD in the criminal proceedings; personally a party to the civil settlement.

Original amount 10,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Sep 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

27 Aug 2024 Cleveland Cliffs Burns Harbor LLCCleveland-Cliffs Burns Harbor: EPA settlement over pollutant emissions at steelworks USAEmissions and permits €222,537

The steelworks on Lake Michigan allegedly emitted excessive particulate matter and hazardous air pollutants when charging the basic oxygen furnaces and during overflows of molten material. Under the settlement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the company is paying 248,396 USD and must charge more slowly, improve extraction and monitoring, and introduce video recording and reporting to the EPA.

What organisations can take from it

Emission peaks often result from operating procedures; binding work instructions and documentation are part of permit compliance.

Relevance to training and awareness

Operating procedures for reducing emissions in production

Authority / court
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Clean Air Act
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Steel and metals
Published
27 Aug 2024

Original amount 248,396 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Aug 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

10 Jan 2024 Cummins Inc.Cummins: 1.675 billion USD civil penalty for defeat devices in Ram pickups USAEmissions and permits €1.53bn

The engine manufacturer programmed the engine software so that emission controls were reduced or switched off during normal driving (around 630,000 Ram 2500/3500 vehicles from model years 2013–2019) and failed to disclose auxiliary emission control devices in a further approximately 330,000 vehicles. Civil penalty of 1.675 billion USD – the highest ever under the Clean Air Act – plus recall and mitigation measures, totalling around 2 billion USD.

What organisations can take from it

Software functions that affect emissions behaviour must be fully disclosed in the type approval process.

Authority / court
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. District Court, District of Columbia)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Clean Air Act
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Employees
10,000 or more

Original amount 1,675,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Jan 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial