Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

DACH Environment and sustainability Clear all filters

1case from 1 jurisdiction

—Total of monetary amounts (0 cases with an amount)

—Largest single case

—Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

by amount by number of cases

Where?

by country

Germany 1 case 100 % ·

What for?

by topic

Misleading environmental and sustainability claims 1 case 100 % ·

Who?

by sector

All sectors

Food and agriculture 1 case 100 % ·

When?

per quarter, by date of decision

Trend
Period	Cases	Total
Q3 2023	0	—
Q4 2023	0	—
Q1 2024	0	—
Q2 2024	1	—
Q3 2024	0	—
Q4 2024	0	—
Q1 2025	0	—
Q2 2025	0	—
Q3 2025	0	—
Q4 2025	0	—
Q1 2026	0	—
Q2 2026	0	—
Q3 2026	0	—

1 case

Newest first Highest amounts

27 Jun 2024 BGH: advertising with ‘climate neutral’ only permissible with explanation in the advertisement itself GermanyMisleading environmental and sustainability claims Order

A manufacturer of fruit gums and liquorice (not named in the official press release) advertised in a trade journal that it had produced all its products ‘climate neutral’ since 2021, although this was achieved partly through offsetting. Germany's Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH) prohibited the advertising following an action brought by the Centre for Protection against Unfair Competition (Wettbewerbszentrale): ambiguous environmental terms must be explained in the advertisement itself, since reduction and offsetting are not equivalent.

What organisations can take from it

Companies advertising with ‘climate neutral’ must explain directly in the advertisement whether emissions are avoided or merely offset.

Relevance to training and awareness

Legally compliant environmental and climate claims in advertising

Authority / court: Bundesgerichtshof (I. Zivilsenat)
Area of law: Environment and sustainability · Misleading environmental and sustainability claims
Legal basis: § 3 Abs. 1, § 5 Abs. 1, § 5a Abs. 1 und 3, § 8 Abs. 1 Satz 1 UWG (Az. I ZR 98/23)
Action: Order
Status of proceedings: final
Sector: Food and agriculture
Published: 27 Jun 2024

Sources

Bundesgerichtshof entscheidet zur Zulässigkeit von Werbung mit dem Begriff "klimaneutral" (Nr. 138/2024) Court press release

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

How the radar is compiled

Official sources only

Every case is based on a decision, press release or database of an authority or a court. Press and law-firm reports count at most as additional references.

Four-eyes check

Whoever enters a case may not approve it. A second, independent check compares company, date, amount and area of law with the source. Only then is the case published.

Comparable amounts

Amounts are converted at the ECB reference rate on the day of the decision. Each case also shows the original amount.

Corrections on record

A correction is a new version that is checked again. Every change is logged. You can report errors directly on each case.

Case texts are translated from the German original. Where a translation is not yet available, the German text is shown and marked “(German original)”. Names of authorities, laws and companies are given as in the source.

The radar reports on published decisions and is not legal advice. Decisions that are not yet final are marked as such where the status is known.

Embed the radar on your website

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Ready for training that sticks?