Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific: 1,838 cases from 37 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

1case from 1 jurisdiction
–Total of monetary amounts (0 cases with an amount)
–Largest single case
–Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Commerce Commission (ComCom), Neuseeland – 0 % · 1 case

What for?

by topic
  1. Misleading environmental and sustainability claims – 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. Kmart NZ Holdings Limited – 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20240–
Q1 20250–
Q2 20250–
Q3 20251–
Q4 20250–
Q1 20260–
Q2 20260–
Q3 20260–
Q4 20260–

1 case

30 Jul 2025 Kmart NZ Holdings LimitedKmart NZ warned over unsubstantiated “100% sustainably sourced cotton” claim New ZealandMisleading environmental and sustainability claims Reprimand or warning

The Commerce Commission (ComCom, New Zealand's competition and consumer regulator) warned Kmart NZ Holdings Limited because, from 4 August 2023 to 4 October 2024, the company advertised own-brand clothing with the claim “100% sustainably sourced cotton” without being able to substantiate it: the cotton sourced as “Better Cotton” was mixed with conventional cotton in the supply chain. The authority considers a breach of s 12A Fair Trading Act 1986 (unsubstantiated representations) likely; only a court could determine one.

What organisations can take from it

Absolute environmental claims such as “100%” require complete proof across the supply chain; a sustainability scheme whose raw material is mixed with conventional material does not support them.

Relevance to training and awareness

Absolute sustainability claims in advertising only with complete evidence

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Commerce Commission (ComCom), Neuseeland
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Misleading environmental and sustainability claims
Legal basis
s 12A Fair Trading Act 1986 (Neuseeland)
Action
Reprimand or warning
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Mitigating circumstances
Kmart removed the claim from its New Zealand website after the authority raised it and stated that it continues to provide regular compliance training on consumer and competition law.
Published
14 Aug 2025

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial