Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,033 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by regionAll jurisdictions
What for?
by topicWho?
by company- HF Sinclair Navajo Refining LLC €34m 39 % · 1 case
- Anonymised companies €33.9m 39 % · 4 cases
- Southern Water €11.3m 13 % · 2 cases
- Yorkshire Water Services Limited €2.26m 3 % · 3 cases
- Severn Trent Water Limited €1.72m 2 % · 1 case
- United Utilities Water Limited €1.12m 1 % · 1 case
- Wessex Water Services Limited €604,741 1 % · 1 case
- Perenco UK Limited €459,900 1 % · 1 case
- Anglian Water Services Limited €362,319 0 % · 1 case
- Clarence Colliery Pty Ltd €325,508 0 % · 1 case
- 2 more€147,975
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 2023 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2025 | 1 | €34m |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2026 | 0 | – |
1 case
17 Jan 2025 HF Sinclair Navajo Refining LLCHF Sinclair Navajo Refining: USD 35m for air violations at Artesia refinery €34m
Under a consent decree with the EPA, the US Department of Justice and the New Mexico Environment Department, HF Sinclair Navajo Refining will allegedly pay a total of 35,000,000 USD for its refinery in Artesia (New Mexico): a civil penalty of 33,916,450 USD for excess emissions of, among others, benzene, volatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides and sulphur dioxide, and 1,083,550 USD for breaches of a 2002 settlement; the civil penalty is split between the federal government and New Mexico. In addition, measures estimated at USD 137m are required, including real-time air monitors at the fenceline and in the town with publicly available results, and a flare gas recovery system. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment. The decision is not final.
Fenceline monitoring obligations require documented root cause analyses and corrective action as soon as action levels are exceeded.
Fenceline emission monitoring
- Authority / court
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) / U.S. Department of Justice mit New Mexico Environment Department (U.S. District Court, District of New Mexico)
- Area of law
- Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
- Legal basis
- Clean Air Act (NESHAP für Erdölraffinerien und Benzolabfälle, NSPS, Title-V-Genehmigung); New Mexico Air Quality Control Act; Consent Decree von 2002
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Repeat case
- yes
- Published
- 17 Jan 2025
Original amount 35,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Jan 2025.
- EPA: 2025 HF Sinclair Navajo Clean Air Act Settlement Agreement Summary Press release of an authority
- Lodged Consent Decree, United States and NMED v. HF Sinclair Navajo Refining LLC, Case 1:25-cv-00054 (D.N.M.), filed 17.01.2025 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link