Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

7cases from 4 jurisdictions
€24.3mTotal of monetary amounts
€874,915Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20231€895,685
20240–
20251€200,913
20265€23.2m

7 cases

24 Jun 2026 The Chemours Company; The Chemours Company FC, LLCChemours: USD 22.5m civil penalty in PFAS settlement with EPA and West Virginia USAEmissions and permits €19.8m

The EPA, the US Department of Justice and West Virginia's environmental agency reached a settlement (consent decree) with Chemours over PFAS discharges into the Cape Fear, Delaware and Ohio rivers, some made without and some in breach of discharge permits, together with TSCA and RCRA violations at four plants. Chemours will pay a civil penalty of 22,500,000 USD in three annual instalments of 7,500,000 USD and carry out remedial measures, including drinking water supply, PFAS controls and a USD 90m mitigation programme, which the EPA puts at over USD 450m in total. The settlement was lodged with the court on 24 June 2026 and is subject to public comment and court approval. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

PFAS manufacturers must continuously check every discharge against their permits – unregulated flows lead to penalties and costly obligations towards local residents.

Relevance to training and awareness

Discharge permits and PFAS emissions

Authority / court
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) / U.S. Department of Justice mit West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Clean Water Act (NPDES); Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; Toxic Substances Control Act; West Virginia Water Pollution Control Act
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
not yet final
Sector
Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Mitigating circumstances
The civil penalty was set on the basis of the company's ability to pay.
Published
24 Jun 2026

Original amount 22,500,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Jun 2026 Denka Performance Elastomer, LLCDenka Performance Elastomer: USD 996,703 over hazardous waste at neoprene plant USAWaste and hazardous substances €874,915

The EPA (Region 6) issued a Consent Agreement and Final Order against Denka Performance Elastomer over RCRA violations at its neoprene plant in LaPlace (Louisiana): missing waste determinations, breaches of land disposal restrictions and treatment and storage of hazardous waste without a permit. Denka will pay 996,703.35 USD and must clean out a brine pit and its ancillary equipment; if the currently idle plant resumes operations, further requirements apply, including on waste inventory, containers, training and protective equipment. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment.

What organisations can take from it

Every waste stream needs a documented determination of whether it is hazardous – without it there is no basis for lawful storage, treatment and disposal.

Relevance to training and awareness

Classification and storage of hazardous waste

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 6
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Waste and hazardous substances
Legal basis
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Docket RCRA-06-2025-0910
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Repeat case
yes
Published
2 Jul 2026

Original amount 996,703.35 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

13 May 2026 NaphtachimieMarseille: environmental CJIP with Naphtachimie for €1.2m after oil leaks at Lavéra FranceEmissions and permits €1.2m

Pyrolysis oil leaked twice at the Lavéra petrochemical site in Martigues: around 50 tonnes in July 2018 through a failed seal into the Anse d'Auguette, part of which reached the sea, and around one tonne in April 2022 through a corroded seawater pipe, of which some 500 kg reached the Anse d'Auguette. Naphtachimie therefore concluded an environmental CJIP (convention judiciaire d'intérêt public, French deferred prosecution agreement) with the Marseille public prosecutor; it pays a public interest fine of 1,200,000 EUR, compensates two environmental associations and will trial, at its own expense, a biological clean-up of the Anse d'Auguette; validated on 13 May 2026.

What organisations can take from it

Seals and pipes at plants handling substances hazardous to water must be inspected proactively; leaks lead to fines and remediation duties.

Relevance to training and awareness

Maintenance and leak prevention at industrial sites near water

Authority / court
Parquet de Marseille (Procureur de la République); Validierung durch den Präsidenten des Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Art. 41-1-3 Code de procédure pénale (pollution des eaux)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Published
26 May 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

13 Jan 2026 Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd.Estee Lauder Cosmetics: 750,000 CAD fine for unreported PFAS in eyeliners Canada, ONWaste and hazardous substances €463,765

A routine inspection in 2023 found that the company was selling eyeliners containing the PFAS substance perfluorononyl dimethicone without submitting the required notification of a ‘significant new activity’; a subsequent compliance order was not complied with. The court imposed 750,000 CAD; the company must inform its shareholders and is listed in the Environmental Offenders Registry.

What organisations can take from it

Product development and regulatory affairs must check new substances for notification requirements before market launch; regulatory orders must be implemented within the deadline.

Relevance to training and awareness

Chemical notification and approval obligations for product launches

Authority / court
Ontario Court of Justice (Ermittlungen: Environment and Climate Change Canada)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Waste and hazardous substances
Legal basis
Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (Significant New Activity, Compliance Order)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Published
2 Feb 2026

Original amount 750,000 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 13 Jan 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

7 Jan 2026 Superior General Partner Inc.Superior General Partner: 1.35 million CAD fine for sodium chlorite in river and late reporting Canada, QCWaste and hazardous substances €836,690

In 2019, as a result of an equipment defect, sodium chlorite entered the Rivière du Lièvre twelve times from the ERCO Mondial chemical plant in Gatineau; in the last incident, the authorities were only informed after five days. The company was fined 1.35 million CAD.

What organisations can take from it

Reporting obligations for releases of substances apply immediately; those who wait for days incur additional liability.

Relevance to training and awareness

Immediate reporting of environmental incidents to the authorities

Authority / court
Court of Québec (Ermittlungen: Environment and Climate Change Canada)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Waste and hazardous substances
Legal basis
Fisheries Act (Einbringen schädlicher Stoffe; unterlassene sofortige Meldung)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Published
8 Jan 2026

Original amount 1,350,000 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 Jan 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

28 Oct 2025 ExxonMobil Chemical LimitedExxonMobil Chemical: 176,000 GBP fine for six days of continuous flaring in Fife United KingdomEmissions and permits €200,913

Following a loss of steam in April 2019, the ethylene plant in Fife flared for almost a week; the smoke significantly exceeded permit limits, and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) received over 900 complaints. Existing procedures and emergency plans should have prevented the incident but were not adequately followed. The company pleaded guilty and was fined 176,000 GBP.

What organisations can take from it

Emergency plans only protect if staff apply them consistently in an emergency – regular drills are part of permit compliance.

Relevance to training and awareness

Compliance with operating and emergency procedures in industrial plants

Authority / court
Kirkcaldy Sheriff Court (Ermittlungen: Scottish Environment Protection Agency, SEPA)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Emissions and permits
Legal basis
Regulation 67(1)(b) Pollution Prevention and Control (Scotland) Regulations 2012; Section 2 Pollution Prevention and Control Act 1999
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
negligent
Published
28 Oct 2025

Original amount 176,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Oct 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Jan 2023 a British paint manufacturerPaint manufacturer: 650,000 GBP fine after TBT entered protected estuary United KingdomWaste and hazardous substancesanonymised €895,685

In 2015/2016, sediments containing the banned antifouling agent tributyltin (TBT) as well as copper, mercury and arsenic escaped from a tank at the company's paint testing facility into a protected estuary; one sample exceeded the safe TBT level by a factor of 80,000. The subsidiary of a paint group was fined 650,000 GBP and ordered to pay 144,992 GBP in costs; it had denied the charges to the end.

What organisations can take from it

Legacy sites with hazardous substances need sealed containment systems, and waste obligations also apply to residues from testing facilities.

Authority / court
Plymouth Crown Court (Anklage: Environment Agency)
Area of law
Environment and sustainability · Waste and hazardous substances
Legal basis
Regulations 12(1)(b) und 38(1) Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010; Sections 34(1)(b) und 34(6) Environmental Protection Act 1990
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Chemicals and pharmaceuticals
Employees
250 to 999
Published
16 Jan 2023

Original amount 794,992 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Jan 2023.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 16 Jan 2025 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial