Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by regionAll jurisdictions
What for?
by topicWho?
by sectorAll sectors
- Financial services and insurance €1.24bn 35 % · 34 cases
- Steel and metals €530.9m 15 % · 5 cases
- Other €472.1m 13 % · 11 cases
- Telecoms, IT and software €399.3m 11 % · 7 cases
- Defence and security €295m 8 % · 8 cases
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering €284.4m 8 % · 13 cases
- Energy and utilities €236.8m 7 % · 2 cases
- Automotive €31.2m 1 % · 1 case
- Construction and real estate €27.2m 1 % · 7 cases
- Chemicals and pharmaceuticals €22.3m 1 % · 3 cases
- 4 more€12.8m
When?
per year, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8 | €34.1m |
| 2023 | 20 | €1.76bn |
| 2024 | 17 | €273.1m |
| 2025 | 32 | €425.8m |
| 2026 | 26 | €1.06bn |
103 cases
24 Aug 2026 Container Manufacturing Ltd.Small US machinery supplier exported spare parts for can presses to Russia €857,339
Between March 2023 and March 2025, the Ohio manufacturer of presses for beverage can ends (nine employees) supplied, in ten instances, spare parts for aluminium forming tools worth around 264,700 USD – partly via the UAE and Turkey – without a licence to a Russian customer whose group also supplies defence precursors. In two instances, the company acted with knowledge of the violation; it admitted the allegations, which were brought by the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).
Even small businesses with few employees must check tariff codes against Russia restrictions and treat deliveries via third countries as a warning sign.
HTS-based export restrictions on Russia, diversion via third countries
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
- Legal basis
- Export Administration Regulations, § 746.8(a)(5) (HTS-Codes Supplement No. 4 to Part 746), §§ 764.2(a), 764.2(e)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
- Employees
- Under 50
- Mitigating circumstances
- Full cooperation; compliance programme subsequently expanded with screening, an approval process and additional export control training
- Published
- 24 Aug 2026
Original amount 1,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Aug 2026.
- BIS Reaches Administrative Enforcement Settlement with Container Manufacturing Ltd. (24.08.2026) Press release of an authority
- BIS Order Relating to Container Manufacturing Ltd. Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
14 Aug 2026 Plexon, Inc.Plexon: brain research recording systems to listed Chinese military medical academy – 1.7 million USD suspended €1.47m
The neurotechnology company from Dallas, described by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS, the export control agency of the US Department of Commerce) as small, delivered neural data acquisition systems (“OmniPlex”) and accessories worth around 179,000 USD on eight occasions in 2022/23 via its Asian distributor to the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences, which has been on the Entity List (the US export control list of restricted parties) since December 2021. The penalty of 1.7 million USD is suspended for five years and then waived, provided that Plexon submits an external audit of its export compliance programme on time and commits no further violations; a five-year denial of export privileges is likewise suspended, and Plexon must also provide export control training.
Screen orders placed via distributors against the Entity List before production – research equipment can also end up with listed military institutions.
Entity List screening for orders via distribution partners
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
- Legal basis
- Export Administration Regulations, 15 C.F.R. § 764.2(a), § 744.11
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Healthcare
- Mitigating circumstances
- Penalty and denial of export privileges fully suspended for five years, conditional on an external export control audit.
- Published
- 14 Aug 2026
Original amount 1,700,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 14 Aug 2026.
- BIS Reaches Administrative Enforcement Settlement with Plexon, Inc. Press release of an authority
- Order Relating to Plexon, Inc., Settlement Agreement und Proposed Charging Letter Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
12 Aug 2026 Rice Lake Weighing Systems, Inc.Scale manufacturer Rice Lake liable for Italian subsidiary's indirect exports to Iran €52,632
In eight instances in 2019–2021, the Italian subsidiary Dini Argeo supplied weighing equipment worth around 121,500 USD to a trader in the UAE, although it knew that the goods would be passed on to a former direct Iranian customer. The parent company had passed on the Iran ban only by an English-language e-mail without explanation; the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) considered it a non-egregious, voluntarily self-disclosed case.
Implement sanctions requirements at foreign subsidiaries in an understandable way, in the local language and with training for all relevant employees – indirect supplies via traders are also prohibited.
Sanctions training for foreign subsidiaries, indirect supplies via third countries
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
- Legal basis
- Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, § 560.215 (Auslandstöchter von US-Personen)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
- Culpability
- negligent
- Repeat case
- no
- Mitigating circumstances
- Voluntary self-disclosure, immediate internal investigation, low significance for turnover, no prior violations, cooperation; subsequent training of the subsidiary's employees and screening of traders
- Published
- 12 Aug 2026
Original amount 60,764 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Aug 2026.
- OFAC Enforcement Release: Rice Lake Weighing Systems Settles with OFAC for Iran-Related Apparent Violations (12.08.2026) Decision of an authority
- OFAC – Civil Penalties and Enforcement Information Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
11 Aug 2026 Citibank, N.A., London BranchOFSI imposes 4.7 million GBP on Citibank London over Russia payments €5.54m
Mainly between February and November 2022, the London branch processed 970 payments totalling around 19.7 million GBP that breached Russia and anti-corruption sanctions. The causes were overloaded alert handling after the wave of designations, delayed escalation and human error; the bank voluntarily disclosed most of the breaches and received a 20% reduction from HM Treasury's Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI).
During waves of designations, alert handling needs additional trained capacity – backlogs and wrong decisions in screening are themselves sanctions breaches.
Handling sanctions alerts, escalation and freezing
- Authority / court
- HM Treasury, Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
- Legal basis
- Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019; Global Anti-Corruption Sanctions Regulations 2021; s. 146 Policing and Crime Act 2017
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Mitigating circumstances
- Predominantly voluntary disclosure and cooperation (20% reduction); exceptional burden caused by the 2022 sanctions packages taken into account
- Published
- 2 Sep 2026
Original amount 4,732,830.58 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Aug 2026.
- OFSI: Imposition of Monetary Penalty – Citibank, N.A., London Branch Decision of an authority
- OFSI – Enforcement of financial sanctions (Sammlung) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
11 Aug 2026 Volga-Dnepr Airlines LLCFederal Court: cargo airline Volga-Dnepr remains on Canadian sanctions list Order
The Russian cargo airline had been added to the list of the Special Economic Measures (Russia) Regulations in April 2023; the Minister of Foreign Affairs rejected the application for delisting. The Federal Court (2026 FC 1048) dismissed the application for judicial review: the Minister had not exercised her broad discretion unreasonably, and there was no procedural error.
Listed logistics partners often remain listed for years – anyone buying air freight must continuously screen carriers and parent companies against sanctions lists.
Listings of transport service providers in partner screening
- Authority / court
- Federal Court (2026 FC 1048); Minister of Foreign Affairs
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
- Legal basis
- Special Economic Measures Act; Special Economic Measures (Russia) Regulations, SOR/2014-58, ss. 2(a), 8
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Transport, logistics and shipping
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
5 Aug 2026 Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd. und Everlight Americas, Inc.Everlight: 5.15 million USD – Chinese LEDs declared as Taiwanese via Taiwan €4.46m
The Taiwanese LED manufacturer and its Texas subsidiary allegedly transshipped LEDs made in China via Taiwan from 2018 to 2022 and declared them to US customs as being of Taiwanese origin in order to avoid Section 301 tariffs (US punitive tariffs on Chinese goods); in addition, Chinese and Taiwanese chips were not kept separate in production until 2025. The settlement of 5.15 million USD resolves a whistleblower lawsuit brought by a former employee, who receives around 876,000 USD.
Where goods are routed through third countries, document their origin by manufacturing step – repackaging in Taiwan does not turn Chinese goods into Taiwanese ones.
Rules of origin and origin of goods when transshipping via third countries
- Authority / court
- U.S. Attorney’s Office District of Maryland (Department of Justice) mit U.S. Customs and Border Protection
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Customs
- Legal basis
- False Claims Act; Tariff Act of 1930 (Vergleich; Haftung nicht festgestellt)
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
- Published
- 5 Aug 2026
Original amount 5,150,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 5 Aug 2026.
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
4 Aug 2026 BAE Systems, Inc.DDTC: USD 36 million against BAE Systems for ITAR violations, including a China link €31.3m
The DDTC settled with BAE Systems, Inc. for a civil penalty of USD 36 million. The allegations concerned unauthorised exports and retransfers of defence articles to several countries, in one case to the People's Republic of China, the unauthorised furnishing of defence services and breaches of authorisation provisos. USD 18 million is suspended for approved compliance measures and USD 18 million is payable in three instalments; the agreement requires, among other things, an external compliance audit. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment.
Retransfers by recipients must be controlled contractually and organisationally just as strictly as one's own exports.
ITAR compliance: retransfers, defence services and authorisation provisos
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
- Legal basis
- Arms Export Control Act § 38 (22 U.S.C. § 2778); ITAR, 22 C.F.R. Parts 120–130, insbesondere Part 127 und § 128.11
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Defence and security
- Mitigating circumstances
- The company reported the matters in voluntary disclosures and in response to a disclosure directed by the DDTC, and cooperated with the review.
Original amount 36,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 Aug 2026.
- U.S. Department of State, Order, In the Matter of BAE Systems, Inc. Decision of an authority
- U.S. Department of State, Consent Agreement, BAE Systems, Inc. Decision of an authority
- DDTC, Penalties & Oversight Agreements Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
30 Jul 2026 Airbus Operations LimitedAirbus Operations pays 6.4 million GBP for export control breaches in technology transfer €7.48m
Over an extended period before November 2022, Airbus Operations Ltd breached the Export Control Order 2008: transfers of controlled technology under three open general export licences (OGEL) were not correctly documented, required registers were missing, and one individual licence was not complied with. The case came to light through voluntary disclosure and was concluded by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) by way of a compound settlement (date of publication).
Technology transfers by e-mail or data room are also exports – conditions, registers and records of general licences must be put into practice day to day.
Licence conditions and record-keeping obligations in technology transfer
- Authority / court
- HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) / Export Control Joint Unit
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
- Legal basis
- Export Control Order 2008, Art. 29(2) und 29(3) (Auflagen und Register bei OGELs) sowie Auflage einer SIEL; Straftaten nach Art. 38(1)(a) und (b); Compound Settlement durch HMRC
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Mitigating circumstances
- Voluntary disclosure, full cooperation, remedial measures
- Published
- 30 Jul 2026
Original amount 6,409,388 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Jul 2026.
- Notice to exporters 2026/17: company named in compound settlement for breaches of export control Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
15 Jul 2026 New York Packaging II LLC (Redi-Bag USA)Redi-Bag USA: 7.3 million USD – “Made in China” marking on carrier bags concealed €6.4m
The packaging supplier allegedly imported plastic carrier bags made in China via Hong Kong and declared them as goods from Hong Kong in order to evade anti-dumping duties of up to 77.57%. According to the US Department of Justice (DOJ), the company had employees cover up “Made in China” markings, concealed the origin from its customs broker and cancelled orders that were due to be inspected; the settlement of 7.3 million USD (a joint payment with a further settling party) resolves a whistleblower lawsuit.
Never instruct staff to conceal origin markings – doing so turns a tariff issue into deliberate customs fraud; give employees a reporting channel for such instructions.
Origin declarations and handling of origin markings in goods receipt
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, und U.S. Attorney’s Office District of New Jersey
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Customs
- Legal basis
- False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 ff. (Vergleich; Haftung nicht festgestellt)
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Liability of senior managers
- Measures against individuals are not reported here.
- Published
- 15 Jul 2026
Original amount 7,300,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Jul 2026.
- U.S. Department of Justice, Pressemitteilung zum Vergleich mit Redi-Bag USA (Entscheidung 2025) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link
Report an error
29 Jun 2026 Petrofac Facilities Management LimitedPetrofac Facilities Management: £569,157 settlement over Russia sanctions breaches €660,160
The company paid HMRC a compound settlement of £569,157.07 for alleged breaches of the Russia sanctions. According to HMRC, while withdrawing from Russia in 2022/2023 it allegedly made sanctioned industrial goods available on two occasions to a person connected with Russia or for use in Russia, and provided related technical assistance. According to HMRC, this is the first time it has publicly named the company behind such a settlement.
Even when withdrawing from a sanctioned market, the prohibitions on making goods available and on technical assistance apply in full.
Sanctions screening of goods supplied and technical assistance when exiting a market
- Authority / court
- HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
- Legal basis
- Reg. 46Y(2)(c) und Reg. 46Z(1)(b) Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Mitigating circumstances
- Voluntary disclosure and full cooperation with HMRC.
- Published
- 29 Jun 2026
Original amount 569,157.07 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 29 Jun 2026.
- HMRC/DBT/ECJU: Notice to exporters 2026/15: firm named after Russia sanctions breach settlement (29.06.2026) Official register or notice
- GOV.UK: Sanctions enforcement action – HMRC enforcement notices (Juni 2026) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
16 Jun 2026 Robert Bosch GmbHBosch pays 36 million USD for sensor supplies to Huawei €31.2m
Between September 2020 and September 2024, Bosch exported MEMS sensors and vehicle software worth around 72.4 million USD from outside the US without a licence to Huawei and affiliated companies on the Entity List (Foreign Direct Product Rule). Bosch voluntarily disclosed the violations; around 3.6 million USD of the penalty imposed by the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is credited against a disgorgement agreed with the DOJ.
Even products manufactured outside the US can be subject to US export controls via US technology – supplies to Entity List customers need their own review.
US export law for foreign-made products (Foreign Direct Product Rule)
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
- Legal basis
- Export Administration Regulations (Foreign Direct Product Rule, Entity List)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Automotive
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Mitigating circumstances
- Voluntary self-disclosure and cooperation
- Published
- 17 Jun 2026
Original amount 36,184,680 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Jun 2026.
- BIS: Robert Bosch GmbH (Bosch) to Pay $36 Million Penalty for BIS Violations Pertaining to Shipments to Huawei (17.06.2026) Press release of an authority
- BIS Order Relating to Robert Bosch GmbH (16.06.2026) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
1 Jun 2026 FTI Consulting, Inc.OFAC: USD 1.05 million settlement with FTI Consulting over prohibited extension of credit to a Russian state-owned bank €901,597
Consulting firm FTI Consulting, Inc. of Washington, D.C. is paying USD 1,050,000 under a settlement with OFAC for apparent violations of the Russia financial sector sanctions. According to OFAC's findings, between April 2019 and May 2021 FTI indirectly extended prohibited debt on six occasions to a Russian state-owned bank subject to Directive 1 under Executive Order 13662: invoices remained unpaid beyond the permitted 14 days or were paid long afterwards while FTI continued to provide services. OFAC treated the apparent violations as non-egregious and not voluntarily self-disclosed; the base penalty was USD 525,000. The settlement amount is above the base penalty; OFAC cited in particular the anticipated impact on future compliance by similarly situated firms. Source: U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), enforcement release "FTI Consulting, Inc., a Global Business Advisory Firm, Settles with OFAC for $1,050,000 Related to Apparent Violations of Dealing in Prohibited Debt of Sanctioned Russian Bank", 1 June 2026, https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/935651/download?inline; summarised in our own words.
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
- Legal basis
- Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. §§ 589.202, 589.213 i. V. m. Directive 1 zu E.O. 13662 (sechs mutmaßliche Verstöße); Vergleich nach den Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Other
- Published
- 1 Jun 2026
Original amount 1,050,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 Jun 2026.
- OFAC Enforcement Release: FTI Consulting, Inc. Settles with OFAC for $1,050,000 (01.06.2026) Decision of an authority
- OFAC – Civil Penalties and Enforcement Information (2026) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link
Report an error
26 May 2026 Sabre Global Technologies LimitedSabre subsidiary accepted payments from designated Ural Airlines €1.16m
The provider of a travel booking system continued to provide services to Ural Airlines, designated in May 2022, requested payments of around 906,600 USD and, after the funds were frozen by the bank, looked for alternative payment routes, which HM Treasury's Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) regarded as circumvention. A lack of escalation during a change of roles, vacant leadership positions in legal and compliance, policies focused on US law and screening that did not flag the designation all contributed. According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2024, the company had around 150 employees.
If an existing customer is designated, escalate this immediately; looking for alternative payment routes after the bank has frozen funds is itself a breach.
Responding to new designations of existing customers, prohibition of circumvention
- Authority / court
- HM Treasury, Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
- Legal basis
- Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, regs. 13, 14, 19
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Telecoms, IT and software
- Employees
- 50 to 249
- Mitigating circumstances
- Voluntary disclosure (31 October 2022) and full cooperation; settlement under the new settlement procedure
- Published
- 17 Jun 2026
Original amount 1,000,920.59 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 May 2026.
- OFSI: Imposition of Monetary Penalty – Sabre Global Technologies Limited Decision of an authority
- OFSI – Enforcement of financial sanctions (Sammlung) Enforcement database of an authority
- Companies House: Registereintrag Sabre Global Technologies Limited (03017786) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link
Report an error
20 May 2026 Farjess Inc. und Royal Canadian Steel Inc.Canadian steel companies pay 19 million USD – steel from Asia and Europe declared as Canadian €16.4m
Two Canadian steel companies allegedly declared flat-rolled steel from China, Indonesia, Italy, Turkey and Vietnam to US customs as being of Canadian or US origin from May 2019 to January 2025. The settlement of 19 million USD (a joint payment with a further settling party) resolves the lawsuit of a customs broker, who receives around 3.61 million USD.
Base origin declarations in cross-border trade on mill certificates – and take note that your own customs broker is often the first to spot inconsistencies.
Proof of origin in steel trading
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, und U.S. Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Michigan
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Customs
- Legal basis
- False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 ff. (Vergleich; Haftung nicht festgestellt)
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Steel and metals
- Liability of senior managers
- Measures against individuals are not reported here.
- Published
- 20 May 2026
Original amount 19,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 20 May 2026.
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link
Report an error
18 May 2026 Adani Enterprises LimitedAdani Enterprises pays 275 million USD over Iranian liquefied petroleum gas €236.1m
From November 2023 to June 2025, the Indian conglomerate bought allegedly Omani and Iraqi liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) via a trader in Dubai which in fact originated from Iran; 32 payments totalling around 192 million USD were routed through US banks. The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) assessed the violations as egregious and not voluntarily self-disclosed; Adani had recklessly ignored numerous warning signs (AIS manipulation by the tankers, implausible loading ports, conspicuous price discounts, irregularities in the certificates of origin).
Companies that source commodities below market price via intermediaries must actively check origin, vessel movements and documents – mere name screening against sanctions lists is not enough.
Warning signs in commodity and shipping transactions (origin, AIS gaps, price discounts)
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
- Legal basis
- Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (31 C.F.R. part 560); IEEPA
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Mitigating circumstances
- Remedial measures after discovery and cooperation with OFAC
- Published
- 18 May 2026
Original amount 275,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 May 2026.
- OFAC Enforcement Release: Adani Enterprises Limited Settles with OFAC for $275,000,000 (18.05.2026) Decision of an authority
- OFAC – Civil Penalties and Enforcement Information Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
12 May 2026 Perfectus Aluminum Inc., Perfectus Aluminum Acquisitions LLC und vier verbundene LagergesellschaftenPerfectus Aluminum: 549.5 million USD – aluminium extrusions imported as sham pallets €468.1m
From July 2011 to June 2014, the companies imported more than 2.2 million Chinese aluminium extrusions that had merely been spot-welded into “pallets”, and declared them as finished goods not subject to anti-dumping and countervailing duties – there were never any buyers for the pallets. A jury had already convicted the companies in 2021 of, among other things, conspiracy to defraud the United States; the civil settlement of 549.5 million USD resolves several whistleblower lawsuits.
Do not use minimal processing to declare goods as finished products outside the scope of anti-dumping duties – that is duty evasion; classify goods according to what they actually are.
Tariff classification and evasion of anti-dumping duties
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, und U.S. Attorney’s Office Central District of California
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Customs
- Legal basis
- False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 ff. (zivilrechtlicher Vergleich)
- Action
- Other
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Steel and metals
- Culpability
- intentional
- Published
- 12 May 2026
Original amount 549,500,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 May 2026.
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
30 Apr 2026 Deutsche Bank AG London BranchOFSI: GBP 165,000 settlement penalty for Deutsche Bank AG London Branch over payments to an app developer €190,476
On 30 April 2026 OFSI imposed a monetary penalty of GBP 165,000 on the London branch of Deutsche Bank AG by way of settlement. According to OFSI's findings, in June and July 2022 the branch processed two payments totalling GBP 635,618.75 for a customer to a Russian app developer owned by a designated entity. According to OFSI, its screening provider's list did not contain ownership information on the designated entity, so the beneficiary was not identified. The bank had voluntarily disclosed the payments on 20 September 2022. After a notice of intent of 12 September 2025, which OFSI upheld on 2 December 2025, the bank requested a ministerial review on 23 January 2026; the proceedings ended in settlement. The publication does not state the amount originally proposed. Source: Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI), HM Treasury, "Imposition of Monetary Penalty – Deutsche Bank AG London Branch (“DBLB”)", 19 May 2026, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/imposition-of-monetary-penalty-deutsche-bank-ag-london-branch-dblb. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 (https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/).
- Authority / court
- HM Treasury, Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
- Legal basis
- Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, reg. 12; Geldbuße nach s. 146 Policing and Crime Act 2017
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Published
- 19 May 2026
Original amount 165,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Apr 2026.
- OFSI: Imposition of Monetary Penalty – Deutsche Bank AG London Branch (DBLB) (gov.uk, OGL v3.0) Decision of an authority
- Imposition of Monetary Penalty – Deutsche Bank AG London Branch (DBLB) (gov.uk, OGL v3.0) Enforcement database of an authority
- OFSI – Financial sanctions enforcement: decisions and monetary penalties imposed (Sammlung, gov.uk, OGL v3.0) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link
Report an error
17 Apr 2026 General Electric CompanyDDTC: USD 36 million against General Electric for technical data exports to China €30.5m
The DDTC settled with General Electric Company for a civil penalty of USD 36 million for ITAR violations: unauthorised exports of technical data to the People's Republic of China, breaches of authorisation provisos, unauthorised exports of defence articles and failure to report material changes to its ITAR registration. USD 18 million is suspended for approved compliance measures and USD 18 million is payable in three instalments. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment.
Changes to one's own ITAR registration must also be reported and belong in the compliance calendar.
ITAR registration and control of technical data with a China link
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
- Legal basis
- Arms Export Control Act § 38 (22 U.S.C. § 2778); ITAR, 22 C.F.R. Parts 120–130, insbesondere Part 127 und § 128.11
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Defence and security
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Mitigating circumstances
- The allegations are based on facts that the company itself disclosed to the DDTC.
Original amount 36,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Apr 2026.
- U.S. Department of State, Order, In the Matter of General Electric Company Decision of an authority
- DDTC, Penalties & Oversight Agreements Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
13 Apr 2026 Coastal PVA Technology, Inc.Coastal PVA: 1.7 million USD (suspended) for brushes sold to SMIC – without an export compliance programme €1.45m
The Californian manufacturer of PVA brushes for wafer cleaning sold goods worth around 400,000 USD on 18 occasions between 2021 and 2024 via two Chinese distributors to SMIC Beijing and SMIC North, both on the Entity List (the US export control list of restricted parties). The company had no formal export compliance rules; the penalty of 1.7 million USD is suspended for one year owing to limited ability to pay and will be waived if training and an internal audit are completed on time.
Obtain a licence even for unlisted everyday goods (EAR99) when the end customer is on the Entity List – without end-customer screening, routing sales through distributors does not help.
Export controls for EAR99 goods and deliveries via distributors
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Export control and dual-use goods
- Legal basis
- Export Administration Regulations, 15 C.F.R. § 764.2(a), § 744.11
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- Payment suspended owing to demonstrated limited ability to pay; deliveries stopped after notification by BIS (Bureau of Industry and Security).
- Published
- 14 Apr 2026
Original amount 1,700,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 13 Apr 2026.
- BIS Reaches Administrative Enforcement Settlement with Coastal PVA Technology, Inc. Press release of an authority
- Order Relating to Coastal PVA Technology, Inc., Settlement Agreement und Proposed Charging Letter Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
19 Mar 2026 Apple Distribution International LimitedOFSI: GBP 390,000 settlement penalty for Apple Distribution International over payments to an app developer €451,452
On 19 March 2026 OFSI imposed a monetary penalty of GBP 390,000 on Ireland-based Apple Distribution International Limited by way of settlement. According to OFSI's findings, the company, which pays out revenues to software developers on an app marketplace, instructed two payments totalling GBP 635,618.75 in June and July 2022 from a UK bank account to a Russian app developer owned by a designated entity, and did not cancel the instructions. OFSI identified reliance on developers' self-declarations and on third-party data, among other things, as causes. The company had voluntarily disclosed the payments on 4 October 2022. The settlement followed a notice of intent of 11 November 2025 and was reached under the settlement process introduced in February 2026; OFSI made no findings against the parent company. Source: Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI), HM Treasury, "Imposition of monetary penalty: Apple Distribution International Limited", 30 March 2026, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/imposition-of-monetary-penalty-apple-distribution-international-limited. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 (https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/).
- Authority / court
- HM Treasury, Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI)
- Area of law
- Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
- Legal basis
- Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, reg. 12; Geldbuße nach s. 146 Policing and Crime Act 2017 (Settlement)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Telecoms, IT and software
- Published
- 30 Mar 2026
Original amount 390,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Mar 2026.
- OFSI: Imposition of Monetary Penalty – Apple Distribution International Limited (ADI) (gov.uk, OGL v3.0) Decision of an authority
- Imposition of monetary penalty: Apple Distribution International Limited (gov.uk, OGL v3.0) Enforcement database of an authority
- OFSI – Financial sanctions enforcement: decisions and monetary penalties imposed (Sammlung, gov.uk, OGL v3.0) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link