Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

4cases from 4 jurisdictions
€195,000Total of monetary amounts (1 case with an amount)
€195,000Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20242€195,000
20252–
20260–

4 cases

10 Feb 2025 EPPO freezes assets: Chinese stainless steel declared as Korean ItalyCustoms Order

In 110 imports via a customs agency in Ferrara, two companies are alleged to have declared stainless steel coils from China as being of South Korean origin, thereby evading almost 2.4 million EUR in additional duty under the 2019 EU anti-dumping regulation; 60 further imports by one of the companies using the same method involve around 950,000 EUR. At the request of the Bologna office of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO), assets totalling more than 3.3 million EUR were frozen; searches took place in Ferrara, Varese, Milan and La Spezia.

What organisations can take from it

False origin declarations for steel subject to anti-dumping duties are prosecuted across borders by the EU prosecutor – with asset freezes already at the investigation stage.

Relevance to training and awareness

Origin declarations for steel imports and liability of management

Authority / court
Europäische Staatsanwaltschaft (EPPO), Büro Bologna
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Customs
Legal basis
EU-Antidumpingverordnung von 2019 (Edelstahlcoils aus China); Hinterziehung von Einfuhrzöllen
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Steel and metals
Liability of senior managers
Those responsible at the companies are alleged to have certified the South Korean origin.
Published
10 Feb 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Feb 2025 Customs investigators: machinery manufacturer allegedly declared Indian steel as British GermanyCustoms Incident

From March 2021, a machinery manufacturer from the Rhein-Neckar district is alleged to have declared steel products worth more than 2.9 million EUR as being of British origin in more than 100 customs clearances, although the steel came from India and was only imported via the UK; correctly, 25% higher import duties would have been payable. In December 2024, the Stuttgart customs investigation office (Zollfahndungsamt Stuttgart), acting on behalf of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO), searched business premises in Germany and at the British seller; the damage is estimated at several hundred thousand euros.

What organisations can take from it

For steel, the actual origin determines the customs burden – check supplier declarations from intermediaries for plausibility.

Relevance to training and awareness

Preferential and origin rules when buying steel via intermediaries

Authority / court
Zollfahndungsamt Stuttgart im Auftrag der Europäischen Staatsanwaltschaft (EPPO)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Customs
Legal basis
Verdacht der Steuerhinterziehung (Einfuhrabgaben nach EU-Zollrecht, falsche Ursprungsangaben)
Action
Incident without known action
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Steel and metals
Published
3 Feb 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

19 Dec 2024 Citibank Europe Plc, Luxembourg BranchCitibank Europe, Luxembourg Branch: reprimand for late implementation of Russia sanctions LuxembourgBreaches of sanctions and embargoes Reprimand or warning

The CSSF issued a reprimand to the Luxembourg branch because in 2022 it implemented financial sanctions under Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 late in respect of two accounts of a listed client and informed the Ministry of Finance late. Automatic fee and interest postings continued on the accounts; according to the CSSF, the listed person did not access any funds.

What organisations can take from it

New sanctions listings must be applied to all accounts and reported to the Ministry of Finance without delay – automatic postings also need to be checked.

Relevance to training and awareness

Freezing and reporting without delay after new sanctions listings

Authority / court
Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Art. 6(4) Loi du 19 décembre 2020 relative aux mesures restrictives en matière financière; Art. 8-4(1) und (2) Loi modifiée du 12 novembre 2004 (LBC/FT); verletzt Art. 2 und 7 VO (EU) Nr. 269/2014, Art. 6(1) Gesetz 2020, Règlement grand-ducal du 14 novembre 2022, Art. 33(2) Règlement CSSF 12-02
Action
Reprimand or warning
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
The CSSF took into account the branch's remedial measures.
Published
12 Feb 2025

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Sep 2024 Amsterdam company pays settlement: dividend paid out to oligarch's company NetherlandsBreaches of sanctions and embargoesanonymised €195,000

At the end of 2021, a company based in Amsterdam paid out a dividend of around 18 million EUR to a Russian shareholder behind which there was a sanctioned person, repaid a loan to a listed Russian company in 2019 and did not freeze shares and voting rights; in addition, a gatekeeper was misinformed. In a settlement (transactie) with the Dutch Public Prosecution Service (Openbaar Ministerie), the company paid 195,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Dividends, loan repayments and voting rights vis-à-vis shareholders with a sanctioned owner in the background are also frozen – gatekeepers must know the full structure.

Relevance to training and awareness

Freezing shares of listed shareholders, beneficial owners

Authority / court
Openbaar Ministerie (Staatsanwaltschaft der Niederlande)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Sanctiewet 1977 i. V. m. EU-Finanzsanktionen gegen Russland (seit 2014)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Other
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not reported here.
Published
23 Sep 2024

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 5 · Company name anonymised since 23 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial