Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

7cases from 4 jurisdictions
€4.42mTotal of monetary amounts (6 cases with an amount)
€381,464Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20231€2.25m
20241€244,999
20254€1.93m
20261–

7 cases

11 Aug 2026 Volga-Dnepr Airlines LLCFederal Court: cargo airline Volga-Dnepr remains on Canadian sanctions list CanadaBreaches of sanctions and embargoes Order

The Russian cargo airline had been added to the list of the Special Economic Measures (Russia) Regulations in April 2023; the Minister of Foreign Affairs rejected the application for delisting. The Federal Court (2026 FC 1048) dismissed the application for judicial review: the Minister had not exercised her broad discretion unreasonably, and there was no procedural error.

What organisations can take from it

Listed logistics partners often remain listed for years – anyone buying air freight must continuously screen carriers and parent companies against sanctions lists.

Relevance to training and awareness

Listings of transport service providers in partner screening

Authority / court
Federal Court (2026 FC 1048); Minister of Foreign Affairs
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Special Economic Measures Act; Special Economic Measures (Russia) Regulations, SOR/2014-58, ss. 2(a), 8
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Sep 2025 Fracht FWO Inc.Freight forwarder Fracht FWO chartered blocked Venezuelan airline with Mahan Air jet USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €1.38m

In May 2022, bypassing internal compliance procedures, the Houston freight forwarder engaged a blocked Venezuelan state-owned airline for a shipment from Mexico to Argentina; the aircraft used, which was also blocked, was operated by Iran's Mahan Air. The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) classified the case as egregious and not voluntarily self-disclosed, partly because two vice presidents bypassed the screening under time pressure.

What organisations can take from it

Urgent customer orders never justify skipping sanctions screening of carriers and of the aircraft or vessels used.

Relevance to training and awareness

Business partner screening under time pressure, circumvention of internal approvals

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Venezuela-, Iran-, Proliferations- und Terrorismus-Sanktionsprogramme (OFAC); IEEPA
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
No prior violations in five years, immediate remediation, substantial cooperation
Liability of senior managers
According to OFAC, the violation was driven primarily by two vice presidents who bypassed internal screening processes.
Published
3 Sep 2025

Original amount 1,610,775 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Sep 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 Jul 2025 Ayzo Pte LtdAyzo: SGD 36,000 fine for freight forwarder misusing other companies' entity identifiers SingaporeCustoms €24,218

In 2024 the freight forwarder Ayzo Pte Ltd misused the Unique Entity Numbers of two other companies in applications for export permits for cigarette shipments to Australia that were described as other goods in the shipping documents, and failed to retain the bills of lading. Ayzo had relied solely on information from an unknown client in India without verifying it with the named importers and exporters. After the company pleaded guilty to ten charges under the Customs Act for incorrect UEN declarations and three charges for failure to retain trade documents, the State Courts imposed a fine of SGD 36,000 on 30 July 2025.

What organisations can take from it

Freight forwarders must verify client and goods information before customs declarations and retain trade documents, or they become tools for smugglers.

Relevance to training and awareness

Due diligence in customs declarations: verifying clients and goods descriptions

Authority / court
Singapore Customs; Verurteilung durch die State Courts
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Customs
Legal basis
Customs Act (unrichtige Angabe der Unique Entity Number); drei weitere Anklagepunkte wegen fehlender Aufbewahrung von Handelsdokumenten (Vorschrift in der Mitteilung nicht genannt)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Published
19 Aug 2025

Original amount 36,000 SGD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Jul 2025.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

2 Jul 2025 Key Holding, LLCLogistics company Key Holding: Colombian subsidiary organised 36 shipments to Cuba USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €517,929

After the acquisition of a Colombian logistics company in December 2021, the latter organised 36 freight shipments to Cuba worth around 3.06 million USD up to July 2023. Neither the US parent nor the subsidiary had a sanctions compliance programme for foreign companies; the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) assessed the case as non-egregious and voluntarily self-disclosed.

What organisations can take from it

After an acquisition, roll out the sanctions compliance programme to the new foreign subsidiary immediately – the Cuba embargo applies to US-controlled subsidiaries worldwide.

Relevance to training and awareness

Sanctions compliance after acquisitions

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Cuban Assets Control Regulations (31 C.F.R. part 515)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure, no prior violations, remedial measures after discovery
Published
2 Jul 2025

Original amount 608,825 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Jul 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

11 Apr 2025 Svarog Shipping & Trading Company LimitedTanker shipping company Svarog left OFSI information request unanswered United KingdomBreaches of sanctions and embargoes €5,768

In the context of investigations into dealings with a Sovcomflot subsidiary, the fuel shipping company registered in the UK and operating from Cyprus did not respond in time to a formal information request from HM Treasury's Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI); a response only came after contact via its auditors. No sanctions breach as such was found, but the information offence was.

What organisations can take from it

Information requests from sanctions authorities need a clear intake channel and deadline monitoring – merely missing the deadline is already an offence.

Relevance to training and awareness

Handling requests from authorities and deadlines

Authority / court
HM Treasury, Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, regs. 72, 74(1)(a)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
Minor, indirect harm; the response was provided subsequently
Published
8 May 2025

Original amount 5,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Apr 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

13 Dec 2024 C.H. Robinson International, Inc.C.H. Robinson: foreign subsidiaries transported Iranian and Cuban goods USABreaches of sanctions and embargoes €244,999

From November 2018 to February 2022, five foreign subsidiaries of the logistics group acquired through takeovers brokered or transported a total of 82 shipments involving Iranian or Cuban goods or an Iranian airline. The main cause was that their booking systems had not yet been integrated into the group's screening processes; the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) considered the case non-egregious and voluntarily self-disclosed.

What organisations can take from it

Connect acquired freight forwarders to central screening quickly; until then, interim controls on origin and carrier are needed.

Relevance to training and awareness

Integrating acquired companies into sanctions screening

Authority / court
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations; Cuban Assets Control Regulations
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary self-disclosure, no prior violations, swift remediation
Published
13 Dec 2024

Original amount 257,690 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 13 Dec 2024.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

19 Apr 2023 a tanker charterer and a tanker shipping companyTanker charterer pleads guilty: Iranian oil for the Revolutionary Guards USABreaches of sanctions and embargoesanonymised €2.25m

The bareboat charterer of a tanker pleaded guilty to conspiring to covertly sell and transport around 980,000 barrels of Iranian crude oil for the Revolutionary Guards. The US District Court for the District of Columbia imposed three years of corporate probation and a fine of almost 2.5 million USD; the tanker's operating company concluded a deferred prosecution agreement with the US Department of Justice (National Security Division), is jointly and severally liable and had to bring the cargo to the US.

What organisations can take from it

Shipping companies and charterers face criminal liability for sanctions evasion involving cargoes – check the origin of oil and ship-to-ship transfers without gaps.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Justice, National Security Division; U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Area of law
Sanctions and export control · Breaches of sanctions and embargoes
Legal basis
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA); Iran-Sanktionen
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Culpability
intentional

Original amount 2,457,467.9 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Apr 2023.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 19 Apr 2025 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial