Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

3cases from 3 jurisdictions
€357.3mTotal of monetary amounts
€338.4mLargest single case: RTX Corporation (Raytheon Company)
€11.6mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20231€7.2m
20241€338.4m
20250–
20261€11.6m

3 cases

1 May 2026 Ultra Electronics Holdings Limited (vormals plc)Ultra Electronics: DPA of around 10.1 million GBP over bribery in Algeria and Oman United KingdomBribery of public officials €11.6m

The British defence supplier failed to prevent bribery by agents in connection with three public contracts in Oman and Algeria (including a contract with the Omani Ministry of Transport worth up to 200 million GBP). The DPA approved by Southwark Crown Court provides for a penalty of 10,083,150 GBP; in addition, the company is bearing around 4.8 million GBP of the SFO's investigation costs and must report on its compliance programme for three years.

What organisations can take from it

Companies that use agents for government contracts must be able to demonstrate adequate procedures – otherwise the company is liable under Section 7 Bribery Act even without any intent to bribe on its own part.

Relevance to training and awareness

Use of sales agents in public contracts

Authority / court
Serious Fraud Office (SFO)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Section 7 Bribery Act 2010 (Failure to prevent bribery); Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Defence and security
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Self-report of the Algerian matters in 2018; restructuring of ownership and leadership; 45 % discount on the penalty.
Published
1 May 2026

Original amount 10,083,150 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Apr 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Oct 2024 RTX Corporation (Raytheon Company)RTX (Raytheon) pays around 369 million USD for bribing a Qatari military official USABribery of public officials €338.4m

From 2011 to 2017, Raytheon paid almost 2 million USD via sham subcontracts to Qatari military and other public officials and more than 30 million USD to an agent from the ruling family. SEC order: disgorgement of 37,400,090 USD, interest of 11,786,208 USD and a penalty of 75 million USD (of which 22.5 million USD was credited against the DOJ payment); under the DPA with the DOJ, 267,096,068 USD (230.4 million penalty, 36,696,068 forfeiture) is attributable to the FCPA part, combined with an Arms Export Control Act violation and a three-year monitorship. Total without double counting: 368,782,366 USD.

What organisations can take from it

Subcontracts without verifiable services are a classic vehicle for bribes – defence exporters must also disclose payment flows to export control authorities.

Relevance to training and awareness

Sham subcontracts and agents in defence transactions

Authority / court
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC); U.S. Department of Justice
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
FCPA (Anti-Bestechung, Buchführung, interne Kontrollen, Sections 30A, 13(b)(2)(A)/(B) Exchange Act); Arms Export Control Act; DPA
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Defence and security
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
intentional
Published
16 Oct 2024

Original amount 368,782,366 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Oct 2024.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 May 2023 a Canadian provider of forensic security technologyCanadian forensic technology provider: remediation agreement over bribery in the Philippines CanadaBribery of public officialsanonymised €7.2m

Between 2006 and 2018, the company allegedly bribed Philippine public officials and defrauded the Philippine state in connection with a ballistic identification system for the national police. The four-year remediation agreement, approved by the Superior Court of Quebec in early 2023 and published on 16 May 2023, provides for a penalty of 6,593,178 CAD, a surcharge of 659,318 CAD and forfeiture of 3,296,589 CAD, as well as an independent monitor.

What organisations can take from it

In addition to payments, remediation agreements require an independent monitor – companies should set up their anti-corruption programmes in advance so that they withstand scrutiny.

Relevance to training and awareness

Government contracts for security technology abroad

Authority / court
Public Prosecution Service of Canada (PPSC); Superior Court of Quebec
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
s. 3 Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act; s. 380 Criminal Code; Remediation Agreement (Part XXII.1 Criminal Code)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Defence and security
Culpability
intentional
Published
17 May 2023

Original amount 10,549,085 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 May 2023.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 16 May 2025 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial