Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

6cases from 2 jurisdictions
€122.6mTotal of monetary amounts
€104.1mLargest single case: a Brazilian food group
€4.21mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20221€104.1m
20230–
20240–
20251€3.44m
20264€15.1m

6 cases

23 Jul 2026 Arla Foods Ingredientes Comércio de Produtos Alimentícios Unipessoal Ltda.Arla Foods Ingredientes: leniency agreement after self-report for BRL 31,056.36 BrazilBribery and corruption €5,375

Arla Foods Ingredientes Comércio de Produtos Alimentícios Unipessoal Ltda. entered into a leniency agreement with the Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU, Office of the Comptroller General) and the Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU, Office of the Attorney General) concerning violations of the Anti-Corruption Law described in an unpublished annex; it had been the first to come forward, in October 2022. The alleged fine of BRL 31,056.36 derives from a preliminary fine of BRL 93,150.45, based on 2021 gross revenue of BRL 6,210,029.68, reduced by 66.66% for self-reporting, degree of cooperation and payment terms.

What organisations can take from it

Self-reporting, full cooperation and the payment terms can together cut a fine under Brazil's Anti-Corruption Law by two thirds in a leniency agreement.

Relevance to training and awareness

Self-reporting and cooperation where corruption is suspected

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) und Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption
Legal basis
Lei nº 12.846/2013, Art. 16 und 17; Decreto nº 11.129/2022, Art. 22, 23 und 47; Lei nº 8.429/1992
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Mitigating circumstances
Total reduction of 66.66% (22.22% each for self-reporting, degree of cooperation and payment terms); compensation for losses, cooperation and voluntary admission also counted as mitigating factors in the calculation.
Liability of senior managers
As an aggravating factor, the CGU found that management tolerated or was aware of the acts (3% uplift).

Original amount 31,056.36 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Jul 2026 The Scoular CompanyAgricultural trader Scoular pays 10 million USD over bribes to Mexican border officials USABribery of public officials €8.91m

From 2013 to 2019, Scoular had customs brokers pay around 400,000 USD to Mexican border and inspection officials so that trains carrying contaminated maize and grain would pass inspections; some of the money went to individuals close to cartels. Three-year DPA with a criminal penalty of 9,769,521 USD and forfeiture of 414,351 USD.

What organisations can take from it

Customs agents and freight forwarders are high-risk third parties: question conspicuous flat fees per shipment, even if they appear to be customary charges.

Relevance to training and awareness

Facilitation payments via customs agents and logistics service providers

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Justice (Criminal Division, Fraud Section; USAO Western District of Texas)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
FCPA (Verschwörung zur Verletzung der Anti-Bestechungsvorschriften); Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation and remediation (including an overhaul of compliance, third-party management, financial controls and anti-corruption training); 25 % reduction off the low end of the sentencing guidelines range.
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not reported here.
Published
17 Jul 2026

Original amount 10,183,872 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

24 Apr 2026 Colônia dos Pescadores Z-12 do Médio Rio DoceFishers' colony Z-12: BRL 7.18m CGU fine over fraud involving Renova compensation BrazilBribery and corruption €1.23m

The CGU imposed on the Colônia dos Pescadores Z-12 do Médio Rio Doce a fine of BRL 7,180,921.47 and extraordinary publication of the decision. Acting together with others, the association had falsified its members' applications for entry in the fishing register (RGP) and backdated records and had interfered with the federal fisheries office in Espírito Santo, so that false data found their way into official documents and compensation from the Fundação Renova, together with lawyers' fees, was paid out without entitlement (Art. 5 II, III and V Lei 12.846/2013).

Relevance to training and awareness

Falsified documents submitted to authorities to obtain compensation

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption
Legal basis
Lei 12.846/2013, Art. 5 II, III und V, Art. 6 I und II, Art. 14; Decreto 11.129/2022, Arts. 19, 22 und 23
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
5 May 2026

Original amount 7,180,921.47 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Apr 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

26 Jan 2026 JBJ Agropecuária Ltda., Prima Foods S.A.JBJ Agropecuária and Prima Foods: BRL 31.16m in fines under leniency agreement BrazilBribery of public officials €4.98m

JBJ Agropecuária Ltda. and Prima Foods S.A. acknowledged, in a leniency agreement with the CGU and the AGU, that they had paid an economic advantage to a public official whose action or omission was in their interest (Art. 5 I Lei 12.846/2013). After a 66.6% reduction they allegedly pay fines totalling BRL 31,156,767.70 in three annual instalments and are jointly and severally liable for them. Payments under an agreement on the same facts with the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) are credited.

What organisations can take from it

Parallel agreements with prosecutors and oversight bodies can be coordinated – double payments are credited, but the liability remains.

Relevance to training and awareness

Payment to a public official to influence official action

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) und Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Lei 12.846/2013, Art. 5 I, Art. 6 I, Arts. 16 und 17; Decreto 11.129/2022
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Mitigating circumstances
For JBJ, credit was given for restitution or compensation (1%), cooperation (1.5%), voluntary admission (2%) and an applied compliance programme (2.5%); overall a 66.6% reduction on the full fine of BRL 93,283,735.64.
Liability of senior managers
For JBJ, tolerance or knowledge by management (3%) and the concurrence of several offences (3%) were aggravating factors.

Original amount 31,156,767.7 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Jan 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

5 May 2025 Minerva S.A.Minerva: BRL 22m fine under leniency agreement over advantages for public officials BrazilBribery of public officials €3.44m

Minerva S.A. acknowledged, in a leniency agreement with the CGU and the AGU, that it had paid economic advantages to public officials whose action or omission was in the company's interest. The full fine under Art. 6 I Lei 12.846/2013 of BRL 51,376,161.22 was reduced by 57.1% to BRL 22,040,373.16 (indexed to IPCA up to March 2025) and is allegedly payable to the Union. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

A working compliance programme and early cooperation noticeably reduce the fine, but do not cancel out the effect of management responsibility.

Relevance to training and awareness

Payments to public officials to influence official action

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) und Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Lei 12.846/2013, Art. 6 I, Arts. 16 und 17; Lei 8.429/1992, Art. 12; Decreto 11.129/2022
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Mitigating circumstances
Credit was given for returning the advantage (1%), cooperation (1%), voluntary admission (1.5%) and an applied compliance programme (2.1%).
Liability of senior managers
Tolerance or knowledge by management (3%) and the concurrence of several offences (3%) were aggravating factors.

Original amount 22,040,373.16 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 5 May 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

28 Dec 2022 a Brazilian food groupFood group: leniency agreement worth BRL 584m over payments to public officials BrazilBribery of public officialsanonymised €104.1m

A Brazilian food group undertook, in a leniency agreement with the CGU (Office of the Comptroller General) and the AGU (Office of the Attorney General), to pay BRL 583,977,360.48 in five annual instalments from 2023 because, according to the confidential Annex I, it had paid undue advantages to public officials or third parties connected to them. The amount comprises disgorgement of unlawful advantages (BRL 314,875,384.01), a fine under Lei 8.429/1992 (BRL 9,173,587.96) and a fine under the Anti-Corruption Act Lei 12.846/2013 (BRL 259,928,388.50); without the agreed reductions it would have been BRL 1,170,184,567.12. According to the agreement, the conduct did not concern federal procurement and no damage to the public purse had been established by the time of signing.

What organisations can take from it

Even without any link to public contracts, payments to public officials can trigger disgorgement and fines running into hundreds of millions.

Relevance to training and awareness

Payments to public officials outside public procurement

Authority / court
Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) und Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU)
Area of law
Bribery and corruption · Bribery of public officials
Legal basis
Lei 12.846/2013, Arts. 16 und 17; Lei 8.429/1992; Decreto 11.129/2022, Art. 33; Instrução Normativa CGU/AGU 2/2018
Action
Disgorgement of profits
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Employees
10,000 or more
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation (1%), spontaneous disclosure before proceedings (1%) and an applied compliance programme (2.21%) were credited; the anti-corruption fine was reduced by 63.33% and the disgorgement by 30%.
Liability of senior managers
Tolerance or knowledge by senior management was applied as an aggravating factor at 2.25%.

Original amount 583,977,360.48 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Dec 2022.

Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 28 Dec 2024 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial