Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

3cases from 1 jurisdiction
€693,000Total of monetary amounts (2 cases with an amount)
€346,500Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (AVK) €693,000 100 % · 3 cases

What for?

by topic
  1. Cartels and collusion €693,000 100 % · 3 cases

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Automotive €650,000 94 % · 1 case
  2. Healthcare €43,000 6 % · 1 case
  3. Energy and utilities — 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20231€43,000
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20241€650,000
Q4 20240—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20251—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20260—
Q3 20260—

3 cases

1 Dec 2025 SUROVINA d.o.o.; SALOMON d.o.o.; RECIKEL d.o.o.; DINOS d.o.o.Packaging waste: AVK finds market sharing by four waste management companies SloveniaCartels and collusion Order

In the reopened proceedings, the Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (Slovenian Competition Protection Agency, AVK) found that the companies had shared the market for take-back schemes for packaging waste and agreed to stop providing their services to a competitor (now Interzero). The authority ordered immediate termination; the decision is not final, and an earlier decision from 2019 in the same matter is partly final.

What organisations can take from it

An agreement to stop supplying a common competitor is a cartel – even in regulated waste management markets.

Relevance to training and awareness

Boycott and market-sharing agreements

Authority / court
Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (AVK)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 6 ZPOmK-1, Art. 101 AEUV (3062-5/2017)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Published
16 Apr 2026
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

24 Sep 2024 GA ADRIATIC, trženje in prodaja avtomobilov, d.o.o. (vormals Renault Nissan Slovenija)GA Adriatic (Renault): 650,000 EUR settlement for collusion on workshop contracts SloveniaCartels and collusion €650,000

In 2021, the Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (Slovenian Competition Protection Agency, AVK) had found that the Renault importer and four car dealerships had infringed the cartel prohibition in the repair and maintenance of Renault vehicles for public contracting authorities. In a settlement procedure under the new competition act, GA Adriatic withdrew its action and received an administrative sanction of 650,000 EUR, payable in three instalments.

What organisations can take from it

Authorised dealer networks must not coordinate on public contracts – even where contracting authorities require brand workshops.

Relevance to training and awareness

Collusion between manufacturer and dealer network in tenders

Authority / court
Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (AVK)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 6 ZPOmK-1 bzw. Art. 5 ZPOmK-2, Art. 101 AEUV; Vergleich nach Art. 95 ZPOmK-2 (3062-5/2024)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Automotive
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement with a reduction of up to 20%; termination after the inspection, cooperation.
Published
30 Sep 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

20 Dec 2023 Veterinarska zbornica SlovenijeVeterinary chamber: 43,000 EUR for ban on discounts and advertising SloveniaCartels and collusion €43,000

Since 2015, the chamber’s professional code had prohibited its members from offering services below list price, at a discount or free of charge and from advertising prices and promotions – including online. As the first decision under the new act and in the first settlement procedure, the Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (Slovenian Competition Protection Agency, AVK) imposed 43,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Professional codes of chambers are decisions of associations of undertakings – price and advertising bans in them infringe competition law.

Authority / court
Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (AVK)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 5 ZPOmK-2, Art. 101 AEUV (3062-13/2019)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Healthcare
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement with acknowledgement of responsibility.
Published
22 Jan 2024
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial