Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific: 1,838 cases from 37 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by authority- High Court Auckland (Klage: Commerce Commission) €355,800 57 % · 1 case
- High Court Auckland (Anklage: Commerce Commission) €273,179 43 % · 1 case
What for?
by action- Fine €628,979 100 % · 2 cases
Who?
by sectorAll sectors
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 2023 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2024 | 1 | €273,179 |
| Q1 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2026 | 1 | €355,800 |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2026 | 0 | – |
2 cases
4 Mar 2026 Aramex New Zealand Holdings LimitedAramex: 700,000 NZD for customer allocation in a reseller agreement €355,800
In 2021 the courier company concluded an agreement with a competitor acting as reseller that allocated customers and fixed prices, and gave effect to the non-compete clause on one occasion; the wording had been copied from an older Fastway template. In civil proceedings brought by the Commerce Commission (ComCom, New Zealand's competition authority), the High Court on 4 March 2026 approved the jointly proposed penalty, allegedly of 700,000 NZD (starting point 1 million NZD, 30% reduction).
Contract templates should be reviewed regularly for competition law risks before they are copied for new partners.
Competition law review of contract templates
- Authority / court
- High Court Auckland (Klage: Commerce Commission)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Commerce Act 1986, s 30
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Transport, logistics and shipping
- Culpability
- negligent
- Repeat case
- no
- Mitigating circumstances
- No previous warnings or contraventions, voluntary provision of documents and interviews, early admission and remorse, new agreements without the clause and a new competition law compliance programme in New Zealand and Australia.
- Liability of senior managers
- The agreement was prepared from a template by the national sales manager; a more senior employee signed it without reviewing its content.
- Published
- 4 Mar 2026
Original amount 700,000 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 Mar 2026.
- Commerce Commission v Aramex New Zealand Holdings Limited [2026] NZHC 444, Judgment 4 March 2026 Court decision
- Commerce Commission: Couriers ordered to pay $1.225 million after investigation into cartel conduct (04.03.2026) Press release of an authority
- Commerce Commission, Case register: Aramex New Zealand Holdings Limited (PRJ0045982) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
18 Dec 2024 MaxBuild LimitedMaxBuild: 500,000 NZD in New Zealand's first criminal cartel case €273,179
The construction company coordinated its bids with a competitor in tenders run by the NZ Transport Agency (national transport authority; Northern Corridor Improvement Project) and Auckland Transport (refurbishment of the Middlemore Bridge). After guilty pleas to four charges of price fixing, the High Court in Auckland imposed a fine of 500,000 NZD on 18 December 2024 in the country's first criminal cartel prosecution; without the mitigating factors, around 1 million NZD would have been appropriate according to the court.
Cover bids in favour of a competitor have been a criminal offence in New Zealand since 2021 – tender teams must never coordinate prices with competitors.
Bid rigging and cover pricing in public tenders
- Authority / court
- High Court Auckland (Anklage: Commerce Commission)
- Area of law
- Competition law · Cartels and collusion
- Legal basis
- Commerce Act 1986, s 30 (Kartellverbot, seit 8. April 2021 strafbewehrt)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Construction and real estate
- Culpability
- intentional
- Mitigating circumstances
- Guilty pleas; the court took account of several mitigating factors, without which around 1 million NZD would have been appropriate.
- Liability of senior managers
- Measures against individuals are not set out here.
- Published
- 18 Dec 2024
Original amount 500,000 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 Dec 2024.
- Commerce Commission: “Cheating the system” – sentencing in country’s first criminal cartel case (18.12.2024) Press release of an authority
- Commerce Commission: Cheating the system: Bid-rigging of roading contracts sees firm fined (23.10.2025) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link