Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

5cases from 4 jurisdictions
€27.7mTotal of monetary amounts
€3.63mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20241€1.17m
Q1 20251€3.09m
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20251€3.63m
Q1 20260—
Q2 20261€8.18m
Q3 20261€11.7m

5 cases

26 Aug 2026 O2 Czech Republic a.s.; SHERLOG Technology, a.s.O2 Czech Republic and SHERLOG: 280 million CZK for customer allocation in vehicle tracking CzechiaCartels and collusion €11.7m

From December 2012 to June 2022, the two companies allocated customers for vehicle tracking and electronic logbook services between themselves and coordinated bids, including in public tenders. At first instance, the Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (Czech Office for the Protection of Competition, ÚOHS) fined O2 262.32 million CZK and SHERLOG 18.357 million CZK and imposed a six-month ban on public contracts; for O2, the fine was increased instead of a procurement ban.

What organisations can take from it

Do not let sales cooperation with competitors turn into customer allocation – e-mail arrangements about individual tenders are the typical evidence.

Relevance to training and awareness

Coordination with cooperation partners on customers and tenders

Authority / court
Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (ÚOHS)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Tschechisches Wettbewerbsgesetz, Art. 101 AEUV (S0255/2023)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Culpability
intentional
Published
26 Aug 2026

Original amount 280,677,000 CZK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

5 Jun 2026 Portugal: 8.18 million EUR against three companies over advertising in TV recordings PortugalCartels and collusion €8.18m

With the support of a consultancy, the three largest pay-TV providers agreed from 2019 to May 2025 to introduce advertising as a condition for accessing recordings and to standardise the marketing of this advertising space. The Autoridade da Concorrência (Portuguese Competition Authority, AdC) imposed 8,181,000 EUR on three companies; together with the fourth participant, already sanctioned earlier under a settlement, the fines add up to 13,351,000 EUR. Owing to ongoing court proceedings, the AdC did not publish the names in its announcement.

What organisations can take from it

Jointly coordinated ‘industry solutions’ at customers’ expense are cartels – even when a service provider takes on the coordination.

Relevance to training and awareness

Coordinated product changes among competitors

Authority / court
Autoridade da Concorrência (AdC)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Lei da Concorrência (Lei n.º 19/2012), Art. 9.º (Processo PRC/2020/4)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Published
5 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

18 Dec 2025 Snowball.xyz-Gruppe (Snowball.xyz, Šviesa, Tavo mokykla, Ateities pamoka) und AL holdingas-Gruppe (AL holdingas, Ugdymo sprendimai, UNT nuoma)E-register providers shared the market – 3.6 million EUR in cartel fines LithuaniaCartels and collusion €3.63m

In August 2020, the operators of the electronic class registers ‘Tamo’ and ‘Eduka’ agreed to stop competing: one group kept the class register business, the other took over the digital learning content. Following acknowledgement of the infringement, the fines were reduced by 15%: 2,714,940 EUR jointly and severally for the Snowball.xyz group and 913,340 EUR for the AL holdingas group (Art. 101 TFEU). The decision can be appealed. Source: archived copy of the press release.

What organisations can take from it

Agreements between competitors on ‘who does what’ are cartels – even when dressed up as portfolio streamlining.

Relevance to training and awareness

Market sharing among competitors

Authority / court
Konkurencijos taryba (Litauischer Wettbewerbsrat)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Konkurencijos įstatymas; Art. 101 AEUV
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Mitigating circumstances
Acknowledgement of the infringement (15% reduction)
Published
18 Dec 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

19 Feb 2025 Inetum (drei Gesellschaften der Unternehmensgruppe)Portugal: 3.09 million EUR against Inetum for no-poach agreements, upheld by court PortugalCartels and collusion €3.09m

From 2014 to 2021, the IT consultancy group participated in bilateral agreements not to poach competitors’ employees. The Autoridade da Concorrência (Portuguese Competition Authority, AdC) imposed 3,092,000 EUR on three companies; in March 2026, the Competition, Regulation and Supervision Court (TCRS) upheld the fine in full – the first judicial confirmation of a labour market cartel fine in Portugal.

What organisations can take from it

Agreements not to poach each other’s skilled staff are cartels – HR and managers must be aware of this.

Relevance to training and awareness

Prohibition of no-poach agreements between competitors

Authority / court
Autoridade da Concorrência (AdC)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Lei da Concorrência (Lei n.º 19/2012), Art. 9.º
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Published
19 Feb 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

18 Dec 2024 Ericsson Nikola Tesla d.d., Kodeks d.o.o., Retel d.o.o., Vatel d.o.o., LUMISS d.o.o., Mitel Austria GmbHCroatia: 1.17 million EUR against Ericsson Nikola Tesla and five partners for customer allocation CroatiaCartels and collusion €1.17m

From 2010 to 2015, the suppliers of Ericsson/Aastra/Mitel telephone systems (PBX) allocated customers among themselves so as not to undercut each other. The Agencija za zaštitu tržišnog natjecanja (Croatian Competition Agency, AZTN) imposed a total of 1,170,968.24 EUR, of which 785,570.58 EUR on Ericsson Nikola Tesla; one leniency applicant (Steiner) was not penalised, and Kodeks received a reduction.

What organisations can take from it

Dealers of the same brand are also competitors – agreements on ‘own’ customers are a hardcore cartel.

Relevance to training and awareness

No agreements on customer or territorial allocation

Authority / court
Agencija za zaštitu tržišnog natjecanja (AZTN)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 8 Zakon o zaštiti tržišnog natjecanja (ZZTN)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Mitigating circumstances
Leniency programme for two participants
Published
5 Mar 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial