Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

2cases from 2 jurisdictions
€528,500Total of monetary amounts
€428,500Largest single case: Synot W, a.s.; Ing. Igor Vicel (Unternehmer)
€264,250Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by region

All jurisdictions

  1. EU €528,500 100 % · 2 cases

What for?

by action
  1. Fine €528,500 100 % · 2 cases

Who?

by company
  1. Synot W, a.s.; Ing. Igor Vicel (Unternehmer) €428,500 100 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20241€100,000
Q1 20251€428,500
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20260—
Q3 20260—

2 cases

12 Feb 2025 Synot W, a.s.; Ing. Igor Vicel (Unternehmer)Gambling takeover without notification: 428,500 EUR for gun-jumping SlovakiaMerger control €428,500

In 2020, Synot and a sole trader jointly acquired control of the gambling operator SLOV-MATIC, transferred shares and replaced corporate bodies before notifying the concentration. Under a settlement, the Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) imposed 400,000 EUR on Synot and 28,500 EUR on the entrepreneur; final since 7 March 2025.

What organisations can take from it

Before closing, neither replace corporate bodies nor steer finances – M&A teams need a gun-jumping checklist.

Authority / court
Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)
Area of law
Competition law · Merger control
Legal basis
Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz (Anmeldepflicht und Vollzugsverbot)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Other
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary subsequent notification, admission and settlement (50% reduction).
Published
10 Mar 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

16 Oct 2024 OGH: 100,000 EUR gun-jumping fine for premature start of a mask production joint venture AustriaMerger control €100,000

A textile company started operations with a joint venture (H* GmbH) for the production of protective masks on 24 April 2020, before the notifiable concentration had been cleared; the infringement lasted until 25 May 2020. The Cartel Court imposed a fine of 5,000 EUR; the OGH increased the fine to 100,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

The standstill obligation applies even in emergencies such as the pandemic – a joint venture may only start operating after clearance.

Relevance to training and awareness

Standstill obligation before clearance (gun-jumping), including in crisis situations

Authority / court
Oberster Gerichtshof als Kartellobergericht (Antrag der Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde)
Area of law
Competition law · Merger control
Legal basis
§ 29 Z 1 lit a iVm § 17 Abs 1 KartG 2005
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Other
Culpability
intentional
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial